skip to main content
10.1145/3334480.3382950acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Time Perceptions as a Material for Designing New Representations of Time

Published:25 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Time is a growing topic of interest in HCI. Technological developments and changes in everyday life routines are creating new perceptions of time that are getting widespread in HCI. While these perceptions expand our current understanding of time, designing for them is an important yet an overlooked challenge. In this work, we investigated five time concepts from HCI literature (right time, clock time, digital time, plastic time, and collective time). We conducted a photography capturing task with four design researchers to understand how they interpret and perceive these time concepts. We then created two design speculations based on their perceptions and interpretations to illustrate how emerging time concepts can inspire new design ideas around representations of time.

References

  1. A. Roger Ekirch. 2010. Paul Glennie and Nigel Thrift. Shaping the Day: A History of Timekeeping in England and Wales, 1300--1800. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Pp. 456. $70.00 (cloth). Journal of British Studies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. P. Eriksson, S., Gustafsson, F., Larsson, G., & Hansen. 2017. Takt: The Wearable Timepiece That Enables Sensory Perception of Time. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM.: 223--227.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Barbara Grosse-Hering, Jon Mason, Dzmitry Aliakseyeu, Conny Bakker, and Pieter Desmet. 2013. Slow design for meaningful interactions.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Lars Hallnäs and Johan Redström. 2001. Slow technology - Designing for reflection. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sung ho Lee, Seong beom Kim, Byoung hern Kim, and Hui sung Lee. 2019. LUNE: Representing Lunar Day by Displayed Lighting Object. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '19, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Siân Lindley. 2014. Making time. CSCW 2015, 56: 33--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Siân Lindley, Robert Corish, Elsa Kosmack Vaara, Pedro Ferreira, and Vygandas Simbelis. 2013. Changing perspectives of time in HCI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Reed Martin and Henry Holtzman. 2011. Kairoscope: Managing time perception and scheduling through social event coordination. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979227Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. William Odom. 2015. Understanding Long-Term Interactions with a Slow Technology: An Investigation of Experiences with FutureMe. In Proc. CHI 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. William Odom, Siân E. Lindley, Larissa Pschetz, Vasiliki Tsaknaki, Anna Vallgårda, Mikael Wilberg, and Daisy Yoo. 2018. time temporality slowness: Future directions for design research -- Workshop at ACM Designing Interactive Systems in Hong Kong | June 10 2018. DIS '18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. William Odom, Ron Wakkary, Ishac Bertran, Matthew Harkness, Garnet Hertz, Jeroen Hol, Henry Lin, Bram Naus, Perry Tan, Pepijn Verburg, and Emily Carr. 2018. Attending to Slowness and Temporality with Olly and Slow Game?: A Design Inquiry into Supporting Longer-Term Relations with Everyday Computational Objects. Proc. of CHI.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Thomas A. Offit. 2014. Objects of Time: How Things Shape Temporality. American Anthropologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.1208Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Larissa Pschetz and Michelle Bastian. 2018. Temporal Design: Rethinking time in design. Design Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.10.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Tye Rattenbury, Dawn Nafus, and Ken Anderson. 2008. Plastic: A metaphor for integrated technologies. In UbiComp 2008 - Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Sarah Sharma. 2009. Book review: John Tomlinson, The Culture of Speed: The Coming of Immediacy. London: Sage, 2007. 192 pp. ISBN: 9781412912037, £60 (hbk). European Journal of Cultural Studies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Patrick C. Shih, Victoria Bellotti, Kyungsik Han, and John M. Carroll. 2015. Unequal time for unequal value: Implications of differing motivations for participation in timebanking. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Proceedings.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jennyfer Lawrence Taylor, Alessandro Soro, Paul Roe, Anita Lee Hong, and Margot Brereton. 2017. Situational When: Designing for Time Across Cultures. In 2017 CHI Conference.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. John C Thomas, Y Pan, T Erickson, E Blevis, C Letondal, and A Tabard. 2013. Avec le temps?! Time , Tempo , and Turns in Human-Computer Interaction. Proceedings of CHI 2013 EA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Time Perceptions as a Material for Designing New Representations of Time

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2020
      4474 pages
      ISBN:9781450368193
      DOI:10.1145/3334480

      Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 April 2020

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format