abstract

Physiological and Psychological Restoration in Matched Real and Virtual Natural Environments

Authors:

Tomi Nukarinen,

Howell O. Istance,

Kalevi Korpela,

Kimmo Ronkainen,

Veikko Surakka,

Roope RaisamoAuthors Info & Claims

CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Pages 1 - 8

https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382956

Published: 25 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

We present a study comparing physiological and psychological restoration in matched real and virtual natural environments. Participants (n=24) experienced a real forest, or one of two audiovisual virtual forests wearing a head-mounted display: A 3D forest or a 360-degree video. The results showed that some of the benefits of the real forest could also be obtained using virtual equivalents. Furthermore, we found the 3D forest to be emotionally more restorative than the 360-degree video forest. The findings can be used in creating restorative virtual environments for people who are unable to visit real natural environments.

References

[1]

Allison P. Anderson, Michael D. Mayer, Abigail M. Fellows, Devin R. Cowan, Mark T. Hegel, and Jay C. Buckey. 2017. Relaxation with immersive natural scenes presented using virtual reality. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance 88, 6 (2017), 520--526.

[2]

Matilda Annerstedt, Peter Jönsson, Mattias Wallergård, Gerd Johansson, Björn Karlson, Patrik Grahn, Åse Marie Hansen, and Peter Währborg. 2013. Inducing physiological stress recovery with sounds of nature in a virtual reality forest-Results from a pilot study. Physiology & Behavior 118 (2013), 240--250.

[3]

Giovanna Calogiuri, Sigbjørn Litleskare, Kaia A. Fagerheim, Tore L. Rydgren, Elena Brambilla, and Miranda Thurston. 2018. Experiencing nature through immersive virtual environments: environmental perceptions, physical engagement, and affective responses during a simulated nature walk. Frontiers in Psychology 8 (2018), 2321.

[4]

John R. Crawford and Julie D. Henry. 2004. The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology (2004), 245--265.

[5]

Pat Dugard. 2014. Randomization tests: A new gold standard? Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science 3, 1 (2014), 65--68.

[6]

Eugene Edgington and Patrick Onghena. 2007. Randomization tests. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

[7]

Stephan M. Gerber, Marie-Madlen Jeitziner, Patric Wyss, Alvin Chesham, Prabitha Urwyler, René M. Müri, Stephan M. Jakob, and Tobias Nef. 2017. Visuo-acoustic stimulation that helps you to relax: A virtual reality setup for patients in the intensive care unit. Scientific Reports 7, 1 (2017), 13228.

[8]

David C Howell. 2009. Statistical Methods for Psychology (6 ed.). Thomson Wadworth.

[9]

Peter H. Kahn, Batya Friedman, Brian Gill, Jennifer Hagman, Rachel L. Severson, Nathan G. Freier, Erika N. Feldman, Sybil Carrère, and Anna Stolyar. 2008. A plasma display window?-The shifting baseline problem in a technologically mediated natural world. Journal of Environmental Psychology 28, 2 (2008), 192--199.

[10]

Christina Kazzi, Conner Blackmore, Fatemeh Shirbani, Isabella Tan, Mark Butlin, Alberto P. Avolio, and Edward Barin. 2018. Effects of instructed meditation augmented by computer-rendered artificial virtual environment on heart rate variability. In 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, 2768--2771.

[11]

Lucy E. Keniger, Kevin J. Gaston, Katherine N. Irvine, and Richard A. Fuller. 2013. What are the benefits of interacting with nature? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2013), 913--935.

[12]

Taekyu Kim and Sangwon Lee. 2018. Restorative Effects of Exercise in Virtual Environments. In Proceedings of the 9th Augmented Human International Conference. ACM, 33.

Digital Library

[13]

Anette Kjellgren and Hanne Buhrkall. 2010. A comparison of the restorative effect of a natural environment with that of a simulated natural environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30, 4 (2010), 464--472.

[14]

Elisa Menardo, Margherita Brondino, Rob Hall, and Margherita Pasini. 2019. Restorativeness in Natural and Urban Environments: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Reports (2019).

[15]

Nature Treks VR. 2020. https://store. steampowered.com/app/587580/Nature_Treks_VR/. (2020). Accessed: 2020-02--10.

[16]

Gunnthora Olafsdottir, Paul Cloke, André Schulz, Zoé Van Dyck, Thor Eysteinsson, Björg Thorleifsdottir, and Claus Vögele. 2018. Health benefits of walking in nature: A randomized controlled study under conditions of real-life stress. Environment and Behavior (2018), 1--27.

[17]

Relax Walk VR. 2020. https://store.steampowered. com/app/645340/Relax_Walk_VR/. (2020). Accessed: 2020-02--10.

[18]

Shinrin-yoku: Forest Meditation and Relaxation. 2020. https://store.steampowered.com/app/774421/Shinrinyoku_Forest_Meditation_and_Relaxation/. (2020). Accessed: 2020-02--10.

[19]

Deltcho Valtchanov. 2010. Physiological and affective responses to immersion in virtual reality: Effects of nature and urban settings. Master's thesis. University of Waterloo.

[20]

Deltcho Valtchanov, Kevin R. Barton, and Colin Ellard. 2010. Restorative effects of virtual nature settings. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 13, 5 (2010), 503--512.

[21]

Jie Yin, Shihao Zhu, Piers MacNaughton, Joseph G. Allen, and John D. Spengler. 2018. Physiological and cognitive performance of exposure to biophilic indoor environment. Building and Environment 132 (2018), 255--262.

[22]

Chia-Pin Yu, Hsiao-Yun Lee, and Xiang-Yi Luo. 2018. The effect of virtual reality forest and urban environments on physiological and psychological responses. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 35 (2018), 106--114.

Cited By

Schalbetter LGrêt-Regamey AGutscher FWissen Hayek U(2025)High-fidelity immersive virtual reality environments for gait rehabilitation exergamesFrontiers in Virtual Reality10.3389/frvir.2024.15028025Online publication date: 6-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2024.1502802
Verstegen AVan Daele TBonroy BDebard GSels Rvan Loo MBernaerts S(2025)Designing a Smartphone-Based Virtual Reality App for Relaxation: Qualitative Crossover StudyJMIR Formative Research10.2196/626639(e62663)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2025
https://doi.org/10.2196/62663
Liang LGobeawan LLau SLin EAng K(2024)Urban Green Spaces and Mental Well-Being: A Systematic Review of Studies Comparing Virtual Reality versus Real NatureFuture Internet10.3390/fi1606018216:6(182)Online publication date: 21-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/fi16060182
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Physiological and Psychological Restoration in Matched Real and Virtual Natural Environments
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Empirical studies in HCI
    2. Interaction paradigms
      1. Virtual reality

Recommendations

Restoration in a virtual reality forest environment
Abstract
The focus in this research was on the effects of restorative experiences in an immersive virtual reality (VR) forest environment. For 5 min one hundred participants used a VR application depicting a forest via a head-mounted display ...
Highlights
- Restorative experiences were studied in a virtual reality forest environment.
- ...
Effects of dynamic field-of-view restriction on cybersickness and presence in HMD-based virtual reality
Abstract
The phenomenon of cybersickness is currently hindering the mass market adoption of head-mounted display (HMD) virtual reality (VR) technologies. This study examined the effects of dynamic field-of-view (FOV) restriction on the cybersickness ...
Do virtual reality head-mounted displays make a difference? A comparison of presence and self-efficacy between head-mounted displays and desktop computer-facilitated virtual environments
Abstract
Virtual reality (VR) has made it possible for users to access novel digital experiences. An interesting question that arises in the context of VR is whether it appears or feels different to users when different virtual environments are used. This ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2020

4474 pages

ISBN:9781450368193

DOI:10.1145/3334480

General Chairs:
Regina Bernhaupt
Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
,
Florian 'Floyd' Mueller
Monash University, Australia
,
David Verweij
Newcastle University, UK
,
Josh Andres
RMIT, Australia
,
Program Chairs:
Joanna McGrenere
University of British Columbia, Canada
,
Andy Cockburn
University of Canterbury, New Zealand
,
Ignacio Avellino
University of Maryland Baltimore County, USA
,
Alix Goguey
Grenoble Alpes University, France
,
Pernille Bjørn
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
,
Shengdong (Shen) Zhao
National University of Singapore, Singapore
,
Briane Paul Samson
Future University Hakodate, Japan & De La Salle University, Philippines
,
Rafal Kocielnik
University of Washington, USA

Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 April 2020

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Abstract

Funding Sources

Business Finland

Conference

CHI '20

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '20: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 25 - 30, 2020

HI, Honolulu, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

23
Total Citations
View Citations
603
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)101
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8

Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Schalbetter LGrêt-Regamey AGutscher FWissen Hayek U(2025)High-fidelity immersive virtual reality environments for gait rehabilitation exergamesFrontiers in Virtual Reality10.3389/frvir.2024.15028025Online publication date: 6-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2024.1502802
Verstegen AVan Daele TBonroy BDebard GSels Rvan Loo MBernaerts S(2025)Designing a Smartphone-Based Virtual Reality App for Relaxation: Qualitative Crossover StudyJMIR Formative Research10.2196/626639(e62663)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2025
https://doi.org/10.2196/62663
Liang LGobeawan LLau SLin EAng K(2024)Urban Green Spaces and Mental Well-Being: A Systematic Review of Studies Comparing Virtual Reality versus Real NatureFuture Internet10.3390/fi1606018216:6(182)Online publication date: 21-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/fi16060182
Kuleli DCharles FGuo LVuillier LLiu CGregory NHe X(2024)Exploring Influence of Social Anxiety on Embodied Face Perception during Affective Social Interactions in VRProceedings of the 24th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents10.1145/3652988.3673952(1-5)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3652988.3673952
Pervez FShoukat MUsama MSandhu MLatif SQadir J(2024)Affective Computing and the Road to an Emotionally Intelligent MetaverseIEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society10.1109/OJCS.2024.33894625(195-214)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/OJCS.2024.3389462
Kari TOjala AKurkilahti MTyrväinen L(2024)Comparison between three different delivery technologies of virtual nature on psychological state related to general stress recovery: An experimental studyJournal of Environmental Psychology10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102452100(102452)Online publication date: Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102452
Swami VGraf HBiebl SSchmid TSiebenhandl AWillinger DGaleazzi FStieger S(2024)Exposure to simulated nature promotes positive body image irrespective of the presentation modality: A comparison of images, 2-dimensional film, and 360° immersive filmBody Image10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.10180351(101803)Online publication date: Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101803
Joshi JWang KCho Y(2023)PhysioKit: An Open-Source, Low-Cost Physiological Computing Toolkit for Single- and Multi-User StudiesSensors10.3390/s2319824423:19(8244)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/s23198244
Jia XXu JXu YLi HPeng SZhao B(2023)Complementarity with Real Forests: A Conceptual Framework and Narrative Review of Multidimensional Effects in Virtual ForestsForests10.3390/f1501008315:1(83)Online publication date: 30-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/f15010083
Lau SLeung SWong JLee TCartwright SWong JMan JCheung EChoi R(2023)Brief repeated virtual nature contact for three weeks boosts university students' nature connectedness and psychological and physiological health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A pilot studyFrontiers in Public Health10.3389/fpubh.2022.105702010Online publication date: 12-Jan-2023
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1057020
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten