skip to main content
10.1145/3334480.3382968acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Data in Context: Engaging Audiences with 3D Physical Geo-Visualization

Published: 25 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Geo-visualizations are invaluable aids for communicating complex scenarios that place data in spatial location and across time. With the advancement of 3D fabrication (and future potential for actuated displays,) more installations opt to project geo-visualization data on physical objects to provide an additional layer of context. In this paper, we set out to compare the effectiveness and user engagement of geo-visualizations data projected on either a flat 2D surface or a 3D representation of the terrain. We present our methodology and observations from this study. Our results so far are inconclusive, which leads us the propose that physical geo-visualization is a thriving field for further research.

References

[1]
Steven Siu Fung Chong. 2017. Evaluating the Effects of Display Realism on Map-Based Decision Making. (2017). http://hdl.handle.net/10150/625455
[2]
UC Davis. 2016. Augmented Reality Sandbox. (2016). https://arsandbox.ucdavis.edu/.
[3]
Hessam Djavaherpour, Ali Mahdavi-Amiri, and Faramarz F Samavati. 2017. Physical visualization of geospatial datasets. IEEE computer graphics and applications 37, 3 (2017), 61--69.
[4]
Sean Follmer, Daniel Leithinger, Alex Olwal, Akimitsu Hogge, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2013. inFORM: dynamic physical affordances and constraints through shape and object actuation. In Uist, Vol. 13. 417--426.
[5]
Hiroshi Ishii. 2002. Illuminating clay: A tangible interface with potential GRASS applications. In GRASS Users Conference.
[6]
Hiroo Iwata, Hiroaki Yano, Fumitaka Nakaizumi, and Ryo Kawamura. 2001. Project FEELEX: Adding haptic surface to graphics. In Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. ACM, 469--476.
[7]
Yvonne Jansen, Pierre Dragicevic, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2013. Evaluating the efficiency of physical visualizations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2593--2602.
[8]
Yvonne Jansen, Pierre Dragicevic, Petra Isenberg, Jason Alexander, Abhijit Karnik, Johan Kildal, Sriram Subramanian, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2015. Opportunities and challenges for data physicalization. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3227--3236.
[9]
Andrew Johnson, Jason Leigh, Paul Morin, and Peter Van Keken. 2006. GeoWall: stereoscopic visualization for geoscience research and education. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 26, 6 (2006), 10--14.
[10]
Vojtech Jurík, Lukás Herman, Cenek Sasinka, Zdenek Stachon, and Jirí Chmelík. 2017. When the display matters: A multifaceted perspective on 3D geovisualizations. Open Geosciences 9, 1 (2017), 89--100.
[11]
Daniel Leithinger, Sean Follmer, Alex Olwal, Samuel Luescher, Akimitsu Hogge, Jinha Lee, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2013. Sublimate: state-changing virtual and physical rendering to augment interaction with shape displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1441--1450.
[12]
Daniel Leithinger and Hiroshi Ishii. 2010. Relief: A scalable actuated shape display. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction. ACM, 221--222.
[13]
Nico Li, Stephen Cartwright, Aditya Shekhar Nittala, Ehud Sharlin, and Mario Costa Sousa. 2015. Flying frustum: A spatial interface for enhancing human-uav awareness. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction. ACM, 27--31.
[14]
Samuel Luescher. 2013. Beyond visualization: designing interfaces to contextualize geospatial data. Ph.D. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
[15]
Amal Marzouki, F Lafrance, Sylvie Daniel, and Sehl Mellouli. 2017. The relevance of geovisualization in Citizen Participation processes. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. ACM, 397--406.
[16]
Garrett C. Millar, Payam Tabrizian, Anna Petrasova, Vaclav Petras, Brendan Harmon, Helena Mitasova, and Ross K. Meetenmeyer. 2018. Tangible Landscape: A Hands-on Method for Teaching Terrain Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 380, 12 pages.
[17]
Aditya Shekhar Nittala, Nico Li, Stephen Cartwright, Kazuki Takashima, Ehud Sharlin, and Mario Costa Sousa. 2015. PLANWELL: spatial user interface for collaborative petroleum well-planning. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2015 Mobile Graphics and Interactive Applications. ACM, 19.
[18]
Heather L. O'Brien and Elaine G. Toms. 2010. The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61, 1 (2010), 50--69.
[19]
Ben Piper, Carlo Ratti, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2002. Illuminating clay: A 3-D tangible interface for landscape analysis. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 355--362.
[20]
Robert E. Roth. 2013. An Empirically-Derived Taxonomy of Interaction Primitives for Interactive Cartography and Geovisualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 12 (Dec. 2013), 2356--2365.
[21]
Terry A Slocum, Matthew D Dunbar, and Stephen L Egbert. 2007. Evaluating the potential of the GeoWall for geographic education. Journal of Geography 106, 3 (2007), 91--102.
[22]
Simon Stusak, Moritz Hobe, and Andreas Butz. 2016. If your mind can grasp it, your hands will help. In Proceedings of the TEI'16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM, 92--99.
[23]
Saiganesh Swaminathan, Conglei Shi, Yvonne Jansen, Pierre Dragicevic, Lora A Oehlberg, and Jean-Daniel Fekete. 2014. Supporting the design and fabrication of physical visualizations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3845--3854.
[24]
Faisal Taher, John Hardy, Abhijit Karnik, Christian Weichel, Yvonne Jansen, Kasper Hornbæk, and Jason Alexander. 2015. Exploring interactions with physically dynamic bar charts. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3237--3246.
[25]
Ramiro Velázquez, Edwige E Pissaloux, and Michael Wiertlewski. 2006. A compact tactile display for the blind with shape memory alloys. In Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006. IEEE, 3905--3910.
[26]
Will Walker, Hyungie Sung, Chris Kevin Ong, and Federico Casalegno. 2017. Exploring Spatial Meaning with a Tangible Map. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 6, 8 pages.
[27]
Terri L Woods, Sarah Reed, Sherry Hsi, John A Woods, and Michael R Woods. 2016. Pilot Study Using the Augmented Reality Sandbox to Teach Topographic Maps and Surficial Processes in Introductory Geology Labs. Journal of Geoscience Education 64, 3 (2016), 199--214. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.5408/15--135.1

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Exploiting Physical Referent Features as Input for Multidimensional Data Selection in Augmented RealityACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/364861331:4(1-40)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2024
  • (2023)Adding Visual Data and Interactions for Dynamic Data Physicalization with Augmented Reality2023 27th International Conference Information Visualisation (IV)10.1109/IV60283.2023.00022(71-76)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2023
  • (2022)An Interactive Augmented Reality Graph Visualization for Chinese PaintersElectronics10.3390/electronics1115236711:15(2367)Online publication date: 28-Jul-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 2020
4474 pages
ISBN:9781450368193
DOI:10.1145/3334480
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 April 2020

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. geo-visualization
  2. physical visualization
  3. tangible user interface
  4. visualization

Qualifiers

  • Abstract

Funding Sources

  • Hawaii State Energy Office
  • Academy for Creative Media System at the University of Hawaii at Manoa

Conference

CHI '20
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025
ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 26 - May 1, 2025
Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)49
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Exploiting Physical Referent Features as Input for Multidimensional Data Selection in Augmented RealityACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/364861331:4(1-40)Online publication date: 19-Sep-2024
  • (2023)Adding Visual Data and Interactions for Dynamic Data Physicalization with Augmented Reality2023 27th International Conference Information Visualisation (IV)10.1109/IV60283.2023.00022(71-76)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2023
  • (2022)An Interactive Augmented Reality Graph Visualization for Chinese PaintersElectronics10.3390/electronics1115236711:15(2367)Online publication date: 28-Jul-2022
  • (2022)Tangible Globes for Data Visualisation in Augmented RealityProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517715(1-16)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
  • (2022)The Hawai`i Groundwater Recharge ToolConcurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience10.1002/cpe.684335:18Online publication date: 27-Jan-2022
  • (2021)Multi-Touch Querying on Data Physicalizations in Immersive ARProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34885425:ISS(1-20)Online publication date: 5-Nov-2021
  • (2021)Data to Physicalization: A Survey of the Physical Rendering ProcessComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1433040:3(569-598)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2021
  • (2020)Tailoring Data Visualization to Diversely Informed End UsersPractice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2020: Catch the Wave10.1145/3311790.3396630(304-310)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media