ABSTRACT
Relatively little research exists on the use of experiences with EEG devices to support brain-computer interface (BCI) education. In this paper, we draw on techniques from BCI, visual programming languages, and computer science education to design a web-based environment for BCI education. We conducted a study with 14 10th and 11th grade high school students to investigate the effects of EEG experiences on students' BCI self-efficacy. We also explored the usability of a hybrid block-flow based visual interface for students new to BCI. Our results suggest that experiences with EEG devices may increase high school students' BCI self-efficacy. Furthermore, our findings offer insights for engaging high school students in BCI.
- Marvin Andujar and Juan E Gilbert. 2013. Let's learn!: enhancing user's engagement levels through passive brain-computer interfaces. In CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 703--708.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alissa N Antle, Leslie Chesick, Aaron Levisohn, Srilekha Kirshnamachari Sridharan, and Perry Tan. 2015. Using neurofeedback to teach self-regulation to children living in poverty. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM, 119--128.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alissa N Antle, Elgin-Skye McLaren, Holly Fiedler, and Naomi Johnson. 2019. Evaluating the impact of a mobile neurofeedback app for young children at school and home. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 36.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aaron Bangor, Philip T Kortum, and James T Miller. 2008. An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Intl. Journal of Human--Computer Interaction 24, 6 (2008), 574--594.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Birbaumer, N. Ghanayim, T. Hinterberger, I. Iversen, B. Kotchoubey, A. Kübler, J. Perelmouter, E. Taub, and H. Flor. 1999. A spelling device for the paralysed. Nature 398, 6725 (1999), 297--298. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/18581Google ScholarCross Ref
- Karen Brennan and Mitchel Resnick. 2012. New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada, Vol. 1. 25.Google Scholar
- John Brooke. 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189, 194 (1996), 4--7.Google Scholar
- T. Carlson and J. del R. Millan. 2013. Brain-Controlled Wheelchairs: A Robotic Architecture. IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine 20, 1 (March 2013), 65--73. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2229936Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Chanel, C. Rebetez, M. Bétrancourt, and T. Pun. 2011. Emotion Assessment From Physiological Signals for Adaptation of Game Difficulty. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 41, 6 (Nov 2011), 1052--1063. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2011.2116000Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Chen and Roel Vertegaal. 2004. Using mental load for managing interruptions in physiologically attentive user interfaces. In CHI'04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1513--1516.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fu-Yin Cherng, Wen-Chieh Lin, Jung-Tai King, and Yi-Chen Lee. 2016. An EEG-based approach for evaluating graphic icons from the perspective of semantic distance. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 4378--4389.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Neuromore Co. 2020. Neuromore. Software. (11 February 2020). Retrieved February 11, 2020 from https://www.neuromore.com/.Google Scholar
- Deborah R. Compeau and Christopher A. Higgins. 1995. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS quarterly (1995), 189--211.Google Scholar
- Chris S Crawford and Juan E Gilbert. 2019. Brains and Blocks: Introducing Novice Programmers to Brain-Computer Interface Application Development. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 19, 4 (2019), 39.Google Scholar
- Edward Cutrell and Desney Tan. 2008. BCI for passive input in HCI. In Proceedings of CHI, Vol. 8. Citeseer, 1--3.Google Scholar
- Sayamindu Dasgupta and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2018. How "wide walls" can increase engagement: evidence from a natural experiment in Scratch. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 361.Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Fraser. 2013. Blockly: A visual programming editor. Published.Google, Place (2013).Google Scholar
- Jérémy Frey, Maxime Daniel, Julien Castet, Martin Hachet, and Fabien Lotte. 2016. Framework for electroencephalography-based evaluation of user experience. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2283--2294.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jérémy Frey, Renaud Gervais, Stéphanie Fleck, Fabien Lotte, and Martin Hachet. 2014. Teegi: tangible EEG interface. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 301--308.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lukas Gehrke, Sezen Akman, Pedro Lopes, Albert Chen, Avinash Kumar Singh, Hsiang-Ting Chen, Chin-Teng Lin, and Klaus Gramann. 2019. Detecting Visuo-Haptic Mismatches in Virtual Reality using the Prediction Error Negativity of Event-Related Brain Potentials. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 427.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Renaud Gervais, Jérémy Frey, Alexis Gay, Fabien Lotte, and Martin Hachet. 2016. Tobe: Tangible out-of-body experience. In Proceedings of the TEI'16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM, 227--235.Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Grimes, Desney S Tan, Scott E Hudson, Pradeep Shenoy, and Rajesh PN Rao. 2008. Feasibility and pragmatics of classifying working memory load with an electroencephalograph. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 835--844.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mariam Hassib, Max Pfeiffer, Stefan Schneegass, Michael Rohs, and Florian Alt. 2017a. Emotion actuator: Embodied emotional feedback through electroencephalography and electrical muscle stimulation. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 6133--6146.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mariam Hassib, Stefan Schneegass, Philipp Eiglsperger, Niels Henze, Albrecht Schmidt, and Florian Alt. 2017b. EngageMeter: A system for implicit audience engagement sensing using electroencephalography. In Proceedings of the 2017 chi conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 5114--5119.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jin Huang, Chun Yu, Yuntao Wang, Yuhang Zhao, Siqi Liu, Chou Mo, Jie Liu, Lie Zhang, and Yuanchun Shi. 2014a. FOCUS : Enhancing Children's Engagement in Reading by Using Contextual BCI Training Sessions. Proc. CHI 2014 (2014), 1905--1908. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557339Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Changing Minds: Exploring Brain-Computer Interface Experiences with High School Students
Recommendations
Towards the detection of error-related potentials and its integration in the context of a P300 speller brain-computer interface
A P300 Speller is a brain-computer interface (BCI) that enables subjects to spell text on a computer screen by detecting P300 Event-Related Potentials in their electroencephalograms (EEG). This BCI application is of particular interest to disabled ...
Brain-Computer Interface using Directional Auditory Perception
AHs '23: Proceedings of the Augmented Humans International Conference 2023We investigate the potential of brain-computer interface (BCI) using electroencephalogram (EEG) induced by listening (or recalling) auditory stimuli of different directions. In the initial attempt, we apply a time series classification model based on ...
2009 Special Issue: The MindGame: A P300-based brain-computer interface game
We present a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) game, the MindGame, based on the P300 event-related potential. In the MindGame interface P300 events are translated into movements of a character on a three-dimensional game board. A linear feature selection ...
Comments