abstract

Beyond Cognitive Ability: Susceptibility to Fake News Is Also Explained by Associative Inference

Authors:

Joshua P. Forrest,

Jessica Strait,

Aiping XiongAuthors Info & Claims

CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Pages 1 - 8

https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383077

Published: 25 April 2020 Publication History

Abstract

We conducted a preliminary online study (N=261) investigating whether people's susceptibility to fake news on social media depends on how fake news are associated with real news that they viewed previously, as well as individuals' cognitive ability. Across two phases, we varied the association in three between-subjects conditions, i.e., associative inference, repetition, and irrelevant (control). Our study results showed limited impact of association type on participants of low cognitive ability. In contrast, for participants of high cognitive ability, their discrimination of fake news from real news tended to be worse for the associative inference condition than for the other two conditions. Thus, our findings suggest that individuals of high cognitive ability are likely to be susceptible to form the belief of fake news, but differently from those of low cognitive ability.

References

[1]

John R. Anderson and Robert Milson. 1989. Human memory: An adaptive perspective. Psychological Review 96, 4 (1989), 703--719.

[2]

John D Bransford and Jeffery J Franks. 1971. The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology 2, 4 (1971), 331--350.

[3]

Axel Bruns and Jean E. Burgess. 2011. The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. In Proceedings of the 6th European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) General Conference 2011.

[4]

Carole Cadwalladr. 2017. The great British Brexit robbery: how our democracy was hijacked. The Guardian 7 (2017).

[5]

Alexis C. Carpenter and Daniel L Schacter. 2017. Flexible retrieval: When true inferences produce false memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 43, 3 (2017), 335--349.

[6]

Vincenzo Carrieri, Leonardo Madio, and Francesco Principe. 2019. Vaccine hesitancy and (fake) news: Quasi-experimental evidence from Italy. Health Economics 28 (2019), 1377--1382.

[7]

Michaela Cavanagh. 2018. Climate change: 'Fake news', real fallout. (2018). https://goo.gl/tCbwYq Accessed: 2019-01--10.

[8]

Limeng Cui, Suhang Wang, and Dongwon Lee. 2019. SAME: Sentiment-Aware Multi-Modal Embedding for Detecting Fake News. In IEEE/ACM Int'l Conf. on Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).

[9]

Craig Silverman et al. 2016. Hyperpartisan Facebook pages are publishing false and misleading information at an alarming rate. (2016). https://goo.gl/6pWtTT

[10]

Mehrdad Farajtabar, Jiachen Yang, Xiaojing Ye, Huan Xu, Rakshit Trivedi, Elias Khalil, Shuang Li, Le Song, and Hongyuan Zha. 2017. Fake news mitigation via point process based intervention. In Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 70. JMLR, 1097--1106.

[11]

Shane Frederick. 2005. Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19, 4 (2005), 25--42.

[12]

Andrew Guess, Brendan Nyhan, and Jason Reifler. 2018. Selective Exposure to Misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 US presidential campaign. European Research Council 9 (2018).

[13]

David J Hauser and Norbert Schwarz. 2016. Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods 48, 1 (2016), 400--407.

[14]

Gillian Murphy, Elizabeth F Loftus, Rebecca Hofstein Grady, Linda J Levine, and Ciara M Greene. 2019. False Memories for Fake News During Ireland's Abortion Referendum. Psychological Science 30, 10 (2019), 1449--1459.

[15]

Gordon Pennycook, Tyrone Cannon, and David G Rand. 2018. Prior Exposure Increases Perceived Accuracy of Fake News. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 147, 12 (2018), 1865--1880.

[16]

Gordon Pennycook and David G. Rand. 2018. Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition 188 (2018), 39--50.

[17]

Henry L Roediger and Kathleen B. McDermott. 1995. Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21, 4 (1995), 803--814.

[18]

Henry L Roediger III and Kathleen B. McDermott. 2000. Tricks of memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science 9, 4 (2000), 123--127.

[19]

Kai Shu, Limeng Cui, Suhang Wang, Dongwon Lee, and Huan Liu. 2019. dEFEND: Explainable Fake News Detection. In 25th ACM SIGKDD Int'l Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD).

[20]

Kai Shu, Amy Sliva, Suhang Wang, Jiliang Tang, and Huan Liu. 2017. Fake news detection on social media: A data mining perspective. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 19, 1 (2017), 22--36.

Digital Library

[21]

Keela S Thomson and Daniel M Oppenheimer. 2016. Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test. Judgment and Decision Making 11, 1 (2016), 99--113.

[22]

David Wechsler. 2008. Wechsler adult intelligence scale--Fourth Edition (WAIS--IV). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.

Cited By

Yu YYan SZhang QXu ZZhou GJin H(2024)The Influence of Affective Empathy on Online News Belief: The Moderated Mediation of State Empathy and News TypeBehavioral Sciences10.3390/bs1404027814:4(278)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14040278
Apuke OOmar BTunca EGever C(2024)Information overload and misinformation sharing behaviour of social media usersJournal of Information Science10.1177/0165551522112194250:6(1371-1381)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1177/01655515221121942
Chatterjee CHasteer NTurpin M(2024)Analyzing Aspects of Critical Thinking Coupled with Technology for Fake News IdentificationIntelligent IT Solutions for Sustainability in Industry 5.0 Paradigm10.1007/978-981-97-1682-1_40(497-511)Online publication date: 5-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1682-1_40
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Beyond Cognitive Ability: Susceptibility to Fake News Is Also Explained by Associative Inference
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Empirical studies in HCI

Recommendations

Falling for Fake News: Investigating the Consumption of News via Social Media
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

In the so called 'post-truth' era, characterized by a loss of public trust in various institutions, and the rise of 'fake news' disseminated via the internet and social media, individuals may face uncertainty about the veracity of information available, ...
Multidimensional Analysis of Fake News Spreaders on Twitter
Computational Data and Social Networks
Abstract
Social media has become a tool to spread false information with the help of its large complex network. The consequences of such misinformation could be very severe. The paper uses the Twitter conversations about the scrapping of Article 370 in ...
“This is Fake! Shared it by Mistake”:Assessing the Intent of Fake News Spreaders
WWW '22: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022

Individuals can be misled by fake news and spread it unintentionally without knowing it is false. This phenomenon has been frequently observed but has not been investigated. Our aim in this work is to assess the intent of fake news spreaders. To ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2020

4474 pages

ISBN:9781450368193

DOI:10.1145/3334480

General Chairs:
Regina Bernhaupt
Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands
,
Florian 'Floyd' Mueller
Monash University, Australia
,
David Verweij
Newcastle University, UK
,
Josh Andres
RMIT, Australia
,
Program Chairs:
Joanna McGrenere
University of British Columbia, Canada
,
Andy Cockburn
University of Canterbury, New Zealand
,
Ignacio Avellino
University of Maryland Baltimore County, USA
,
Alix Goguey
Grenoble Alpes University, France
,
Pernille Bjørn
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
,
Shengdong (Shen) Zhao
National University of Singapore, Singapore
,
Briane Paul Samson
Future University Hakodate, Japan & De La Salle University, Philippines
,
Rafal Kocielnik
University of Washington, USA

Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 April 2020

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Abstract

Funding Sources

Conference

CHI '20

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '20: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 25 - 30, 2020

HI, Honolulu, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

6
Total Citations
View Citations
554
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)72
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Yu YYan SZhang QXu ZZhou GJin H(2024)The Influence of Affective Empathy on Online News Belief: The Moderated Mediation of State Empathy and News TypeBehavioral Sciences10.3390/bs1404027814:4(278)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14040278
Apuke OOmar BTunca EGever C(2024)Information overload and misinformation sharing behaviour of social media usersJournal of Information Science10.1177/0165551522112194250:6(1371-1381)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1177/01655515221121942
Chatterjee CHasteer NTurpin M(2024)Analyzing Aspects of Critical Thinking Coupled with Technology for Fake News IdentificationIntelligent IT Solutions for Sustainability in Industry 5.0 Paradigm10.1007/978-981-97-1682-1_40(497-511)Online publication date: 5-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1682-1_40
Lee SXiong ASeo HLee D(2023)“Fact-checking” fact checkers: A data-driven approachHarvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review10.37016/mr-2020-126Online publication date: 26-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-126
Leon CBonilla MBrusco LForcato CBenítez F(2023)Fake news and false memory formation in the psychology debateIBRO Neuroscience Reports10.1016/j.ibneur.2023.06.00215(24-30)Online publication date: Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibneur.2023.06.002
Albaghli RChang CAlmahmeed SAttar N(2022)Untraining Ethnocentric Biases about Gender Roles: A Preliminary Empirical Study Presenting Art as StimulusProceedings of Mensch und Computer 202210.1145/3543758.3547543(376-381)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3543758.3547543

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten