skip to main content
10.1145/3334480.3383101acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Interactive Parallel Coordinates for Parametric Design Space Exploration

Published:25 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present an interactive visualization based on parallel coordinates that enables comparison, generation, and modification of multiple parametric design alternatives. Such capabilities are lacking in existing tools. Initial evaluation suggests that our proposal improves usability over existing tools, has novel parameter space exploration capabilities, and also reveals a space for designing direct interactions with visualizations to support parametric exploration.

References

  1. Thornton Tomasetti CORE Studio. 2017. Design Explorer 2. (2017). Retrieved 12 Feb 2020 from https://tt-acm.github.io/DesignExplorer/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Christopher Ahlberg and Ben Shneiderman. 1994. The Alphaslider: A Compact and Rapid Selector. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '94). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 365--371.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Christopher Ahlberg, Christopher Williamson, and Ben Shneiderman. 1992. Dynamic Queries for Information Exploration: An Implementation and Evaluation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '92). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 619--626. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/142750.143054Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Gennady Andrienko and Natalia Andrienko. 2001. Constructing parallel coordinates plot for problem solving. In 1st International Symposium on Smart Graphics. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Richard Balling. 1999. Design by shopping: A new paradigm?. In Proceedings of the Third World Congress of structural and multidisciplinary optimization (WCSMO-3), Vol. 1. International Society for Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 295--297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Michael Beham, Wolfgang Herzner, M Eduard Gröller, and Johannes Kehrer. 2014. Cupid: Cluster-based exploration of geometry generators with parallel coordinates and radial trees. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 20, 12 (2014), 1693--1702.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Erin Bradner, Francesco Iorio, and Mark Davis. 2014. Parameters Tell the Design Story: Ideation and Abstraction in Design Optimization. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Simulation for Architecture & Urban Design (SimAUD '14). Society for Computer Simulation International, San Diego, CA, USA, 26:1--26:8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. Coffey, C. Lin, A. G. Erdman, and D. F. Keefe. 2013. Design by Dragging: An Interface for Creative Forward and Inverse Design with Simulation Ensembles. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 12 (Dec. 2013), 2783--2791.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Harish Doraiswamy, Nivan Ferreira, Marcos Lage, Huy Vo, Luc Wilson, Heidi Werner, Muchan Park, and Cláudio Silva. 2015. Topology-based Catalogue Exploration Framework for Identifying View-enhanced Tower Designs. ACM Trans. Graph. 34, 6 (Oct. 2015), 230:1--230:13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Steven P. Dow, Alana Glassco, Jonathan Kass, Melissa Schwarz, Daniel L. Schwartz, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2010. Parallel Prototyping Leads to Better Design Results, More Divergence, and Increased Self-efficacy. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 17, 4 (Dec. 2010), 18:1--18:24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. T. R. G. Green, A. E. Blandford, L. Church, C. R. Roast, and S. Clarke. 2006. Cognitive dimensions: Achievements, new directions, and open questions. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing 17, 4 (Aug. 2006), 328--365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Björn Hartmann, Loren Yu, Abel Allison, Yeonsoo Yang, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2008. Design As Exploration: Creating Interface Alternatives Through Parallel Authoring and Runtime Tuning. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 91--100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Julian Heinrich and Daniel Weiskopf. 2013. State of the Art of Parallel Coordinates. In Eurographics 2013 State of the Art Reports, M. Sbert and L. Szirmay-Kalos (Eds.). The Eurographics Association, 95--116. DOI:http: //dx.doi.org/10.2312/conf/EG2013/stars/095--116Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. A. Inselberg. 1997. Multidimensional detective. In Proceedings of VIZ '97: Visualization Conference, Information Visualization Symposium and Parallel Rendering Symposium. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 100--107. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.1997.636793Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. J. Johansson and C. Forsell. 2016. Evaluation of Parallel Coordinates: Overview, Categorization and Guidelines for Future Research. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 1 (Jan. 2016), 579--588.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jimmy Johansson, Camilla Forsell, Mats Lind, and Matthew Cooper. 2008. Perceiving Patterns in Parallel Coordinates: Determining Thresholds for Identification of Relationships. Information Visualization 7, 2 (2008), 152--162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. R. Kosara, F. Bendix, and H. Hauser. 2006. Parallel Sets: interactive exploration and visual analysis of categorical data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12, 4 (July 2006), 558--568. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2006.76Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Heidi Lam, Enrico Bertini, Petra Isenberg, Catherine Plaisant, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2011. Empirical studies in information visualization: Seven scenarios. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 18, 9 (2011), 1520--1536.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Aran Lunzer and Kasper Hornbæk. 2008. Subjunctive Interfaces: Extending Applications to Support Parallel Setup, Viewing and Control of Alternative Scenarios. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 14, 4 (Jan. 2008), 17:1--17:44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Joe Marks, Paul Beardsley, Brad Andalman, William Freeman, Sarah Gibson, Jessica Hodgins, Thomas Kang, Brian Mirtich, Hanspeter Pfister, Wheeler Ruml, Joshua Seims, and Stuart Shieber. 1997. Design galleries: a general approach to setting parameters for computer graphics and animation. In Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques (SIGGRAPH '97). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, USA, 389--400. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/258734.258887Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Justin Matejka, Michael Glueck, Erin Bradner, Ali Hashemi, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2018. Dream Lens: Exploration and Visualization of Large-Scale Generative Design Datasets. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 369:1--369:12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Arefin Mohiuddin, Robert Woodbury, Mark Cichy, Volker Mueller, and Narges Ashtari. 2017. A Design Gallery System: Prototype and Evaluation. In ACADIA 2017: Disciplines & Disruption. ACADIA, Boston, MA, 414--425. http://papers.cumincad.org/cgi-bin/works/Show?acadia17_414Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. J. C. Roberts. 2007. State of the Art: Coordinated Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization. In Fifth International Conference on Coordinated and Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization (CMV 2007). 61--71. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CMV.2007.20Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. M. Sedlmair, C. Heinzl, S. Bruckner, H. Piringer, and T. Möller. 2014. Visual Parameter Space Analysis: A Conceptual Framework. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20, 12 (Dec. 2014), 2161--2170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Herbert A. Simon. 1980. The Sciences of the Artificial - Second Edition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Robert Spence. 2014. Interaction. In Information Visualization: An Introduction, Robert Spence (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 173--223.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 1994. Grounded theory methodology. Handbook of qualitative research 17 (1994), 273--85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Gary M. Stump, Mike Yukish, Timothy W. Simpson, and E. Nathan Harris. 2003. Design Space Visualization and Its Application to a Design by Shopping Paradigm. In ASME 2003 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Vol. Volume 2: 29th Design Automation Conference, Parts A and B. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, 795--804. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/DETC2003/DAC-48785Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Michael Terry and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. 2002. Recognizing Creative Needs in User Interface Design. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Creativity & Cognition (C&C '02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 38--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Michael Terry, Elizabeth D. Mynatt, Kumiyo Nakakoji, and Yasuhiro Yamamoto. 2004. Variation in Element and Action: Supporting Simultaneous Development of Alternative Solutions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 711--718.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Maryam Tohidi, William Buxton, Ronald Baecker, and Abigail Sellen. 2006. Getting the Right Design and the Design Right. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1243--1252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. M. Tory, S. Potts, and T. Moller. 2005. A parallel coordinates style interface for exploratory volume visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 11, 1 (Jan. 2005), 71--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Lisa Tweedie, Bob Spence, David Williams, and Ravinder Bhogal. 1994. The Attribute Explorer. In Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '94). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 435--436.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Lisa Tweedie, Robert Spence, Huw Dawkes, and Hus Su. 1996. Externalising Abstract Mathematical Models. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '96). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 406--ff.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Robert Woodbury. 2010. Elements of parametric design / Robert Woodbury; with contributions by Onur Yüce Gün, Brady Peters and Mehdi (Roham) Sheikholeslami. Routledge, London ; New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Robert Woodbury, Arefin Mohiuddin, Mark Cichy, and Volker Mueller. 2017. Interactive design galleries: A general approach to interacting with design alternatives. Design Studies 52 (Sept. 2017), 40--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Loutfouz Zaman, Wolfgang Stuerzlinger, Christian Neugebauer, Rob Woodbury, Maher Elkhaldi, Naghmi Shireen, and Michael Terry. 2015. GEM-NI: A System for Creating and Managing Alternatives In Generative Design. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1201--1210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Interactive Parallel Coordinates for Parametric Design Space Exploration

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format