skip to main content
10.1145/3337722.3341872acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfdgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Academics without borders

Published:26 August 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Games research is a growing interdisciplinary field. As with many interdisciplinary fields, early career faculty often confront many questions concerning the tenure process and evaluation of their interdisciplinary work. While there have been several publications on guidelines or best practices for evaluating interdisciplinary research, addressing Tenure and Promotion policies and processes for faculty as well as units and chairs, none specifically discusses tenure and promotion practices and guidelines for games research. Wardrip---Fruin and Mateas, in a report dating back to 2014 [17], outlined some challenges and recommendations for supporting work within the area of computational media. This report was the first to unpack some issues faced by computational media researchers with some recommendations to the community, funding agencies and institutions, to support this growing and evolving research area. However, this report did not target the tenure and promotion process, specifically. Now that the community is maturing with many faculty already undergoing or have undergone tenure and promotion, more publications and discussions are needed to support the diverse nature of this research area and its junior faculty. This workshop is then a first step to address this issue within the community. This article contributes to this discussion by outlining previous publications' recommendations and guidelines for inter-disciplinary research that are also applicable to the games research area. Additionally, the article also outlines specific unique aspects for games research with some take-aways of challenges and action items that we can take as a community to address these challenges.

References

  1. Barry Brown and Marek Bell. 2004. CSCW at play:'there'as a collaborative virtual environment. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 350--359. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Stacey Guy, Alexandria Ratzki-Leewing, and Femida Gwadry-Sridhar. 2011. Moving beyond the stigma: systematic review of video games and their potential to combat obesity. International journal of hypertension 2011 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Steve Harrison, Phoebe Sengers, and Deborah Tatar. 2011. Making epistemological trouble: Third-paradigm HCI as successor science. Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (2011), 385--392. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Karri A Holley. 2009. Understanding Interdisciplinary Challenges and Opportunities in Higher Education. ASHE Higher Education Report 35, 2 (2009), 1--131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. W Jacob. 2015. Interdisciplinary trends in higher education. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Georges E Khalil. 2013. Fear and happiness in âĂIJRe-MissionâĂİ: Teasing out emotional gaming events responsible for cancer risk perception. In Games for Health. Springer, 27--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Julie Thompson Klein and Holly J Falk-Krzesinski. 2017. Interdisciplinary and collaborative work: Framing promotion and tenure practices and policies. Research Policy 46, 6 (2017), 1055--1061.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Julie Thompson Klein, Karen Moranski, and Roslyn Schindler. 2016. Guidelines for Tenure and Promotion for Interdisciplinary Faculty. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J Garcia Marin, K Felix Navarro, and Elaine Lawrence. 2011. Serious games to improve the physical health of the elderly: A categorization scheme. In International Conference on Advances in Human-oriented and Personalized Mechanisms, Technologies, and Services. Barcelona, Spain.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hossein Mousavi Hondori and Maryam Khademi. 2014. A review on technical and clinical impact of microsoft kinect on physical therapy and rehabilitation. Journal of medical engineering 2014 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Engineering National Academy of Science and Medicine. 2005. IFacilitating Interdisciplinary Research. The National Academies Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Truong-Huy D Nguyen, Edward Melcer, Alessandro Canossa, Katherine Isbister, and Magy Seif El-Nasr. 2018. Seagull: A birdâĂŹs-eye view of the evolution of technical games research. Entertainment computing 26 (2018), 88--104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Martha E. Pollack and Marc Snir. 2008. Promotion and Tenure of Interdisciplinary Faculty. (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kate Rosier and Celia Pearce. 2011. Doing gender versus playing gender in online worlds: Masculinity and femininity in Second Life and Guild Wars. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds 3, 2 (2011), 125--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Phoebe Sengers, John McCarthy, and Paul Dourish. 2006. Reflective HCI: articulating an agenda for critical practice. In CHI'06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1683--1686. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. USC. 2017. University Committee on Appointments, Promotions, and Tenure. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Noah Wardrip-Fruin and Michael Mateas. 2014. Envisioning the Future of Computational Media: The Final Report of the Media Systems Project. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Geogios N Yannakakis. 2012. Game AI revisited. In Proceedings of the 9th conference on Computing Frontiers. ACM, 285--292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Georgios N Yannakakis and Julian Togelius. 2018. Artificial intelligence and games. Vol. 2. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jichen Zhu and D Fox Harrell. 2011. A Journey along the Borderland: A Critical Approach to Artificial Intelligence-Based Art and Literary Practices. In Arts: A Science Matter. World Scientific, 222--246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Academics without borders

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      FDG '19: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games
      August 2019
      822 pages
      ISBN:9781450372176
      DOI:10.1145/3337722

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 August 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      FDG '19 Paper Acceptance Rate46of124submissions,37%Overall Acceptance Rate152of415submissions,37%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader