skip to main content
10.1145/3338286.3344418acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration

EOG Glasses: an Eyewear Platform for Cognitive and Social Interaction Assessments in the Wild

Published:01 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this work we present the smart eyewear demo setup consisting of the software platform for cognitive and social interaction assessments in the wild, with several application cases and a demonstration of activity recognition in real-time. The platform is designed to work with Jins MEME, smart EOG enabled glasses, The user software is capable data logging, posture tracking and recognition of several activities, such as talking, reading and blinking. In this work we present several applications and studies that the platform has been used for.

References

  1. Oliver Amft, Florian Wahl, Shoya Ishimaru, and Kai Kunze. 2015. Making regular eyeglasses smart. IEEE Pervasive Computing 14, 3 (2015), 32--43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Carlos Toshinori Ishi, Hiroshi Ishiguro, and Norihiro Hagita. 2014. Analysis of relationship between head motion events and speech in dialogue conversations. Speech Communication 57 (2014), 233--243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Shoya Ishimaru, Kai Kunze, Koichi Kise, Jens Weppner, Andreas Dengel, Paul Lukowicz, and Andreas Bulling. 2014. In the blink of an eye: combining head motion and eye blink frequency for activity recognition with Google Glass. (2014), 15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Gloria Mark, Shamsi T. Iqbal, Mary Czerwinski, and Paul Johns. 2015. Focused, Aroused, but so Distractible: A Temporal Perspective on Multitasking and Communications. CSCW '15 Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (2015), 903--916. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675221Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Evelyn Z McClave. 2000. Linguistic functions of head movements in the context of speech. Journal of pragmatics 32, 7 (2000), 855--878.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Tamami Nakano, Nobumasa Kato, and Shigeru Kitazawa. 2011. Lack of eyeblink entrainments in autism spectrum disorders. Neuropsychologia 49, 9 (2011), 2784--2790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.06.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Sarah Shultz, Ami Klin, and Warren Jones. 2011. Inhibition of eye blinking reveals subjective perceptions of stimulus salience. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 52 (2011), 21270--21275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Benjamin Tag, Andrew W Vargo, Aman Gupta, George Chernyshov, Kai Kunze, and Tilman Dingler. 2019. Continuous Alertness Assessments: Using EOG Glasses to Unobtrusively Monitor Fatigue Levels In-The-Wild. (2019), 464.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. EOG Glasses: an Eyewear Platform for Cognitive and Social Interaction Assessments in the Wild

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                MobileHCI '19: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services
                October 2019
                646 pages
                ISBN:9781450368254
                DOI:10.1145/3338286

                Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 1 October 2019

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • demonstration
                • Research
                • Refereed limited

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader