skip to main content
10.1145/3338906.3340451acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design thinking in practice: understanding manifestations of design thinking in software engineering

Published:12 August 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

This industry case study explores where and how Design Thinking supports software development teams in their endeavour to create innovative software solutions. Design Thinking has found its way into software companies ranging from startups to SMEs and multinationals. It is mostly seen as a human centered innovation approach or a way to elicit requirements in a more agile fashion. However, research in Design Thinking suggests that being exposed to DT changes the mindset of employees. Thus this article aims to explore the wider use of DT within software companies through a case study in a multinational organization. Our results indicate, that once trained in DT, employees find various ways to implement it not only as a pre-phase to software development but throughout their projects even applying it to aspects of their surroundings such as the development process, team spaces and team work. Specifically we present a model of how DT manifests itself in a software development company.

References

  1. Walter Brenner, Falk Uebernickel, and Thomas Abrell. 2016. Design Thinking as Mindset, Process, and Toolbox. In Design Thinking for Innovation, Walter Brenner and Falk Uebernickel (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 3–21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Tim Brown. 2008. Design thinking. harvard business review 86, 6 (2008), 84. http://www.unusualleading.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/HBR-on-Design-Thinking.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Richard Buchanan. 1992. Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues 8, 2 (1992), 5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Lisa Carlgren, Maria Elmquist, and Ingo Rauth. 2014. Design Thinking: Exploring Values and Effects from an Innovation Capability Perspective. The Design Journal 17, 3 (Sept. 2014), 403–423.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Lisa Carlgren, Ingo Rauth, and Maria Elmquist. 2016. Framing Design Thinking: The Concept in Idea and Enactment: Creativity and Innovation Management. Creativity and Innovation Management 25, 1 (March 2016), 38–57. org/10.1111/caim.12153Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Kathy Charmaz. 2014. Constructing grounded theory. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Debabrata Chatterjee and Sreevas Sahasranamam. 2018. Technological innovation research in China and India: A bibliometric analysis for the period 1991–2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Management and Organization Review 14, 1 (2018), 179–221.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Nigel Cross. 1982. Designerly ways of knowing. DESIGN STUDIES 3, 4 (1982), 7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Beatrice D’Ippolito. 2014. The importance of design for firms’ competitiveness: A review of the literature. Technovation 34, 11 (Nov. 2014), 716–730.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Franziska Dobrigkeit, Danielly de Paula, and Matthias Uflacker. 2018. InnoDev - A Software Development Methodology Integrating Design Thinking, Scrum and Lean Startup. In Design Thinking - Research Looking Further: Design Thinking Beyond Solution-Fixation, Hasso Plattner, Christoph Meinel, and Larry Leifer (Eds.). Springer, 199–228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Leonhard Glomann. 2018. Introducing ‘Human-Centered Agile Workflow’ (HCAW) – An Agile Conception and Development Process Model. In Advances in Usability and User Experience, Tareq Ahram and Christianne Falcão (Eds.). Vol. 607. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 646–655. 3-319-60492-3_61Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Michele Grimaldi, Vincenzo Corvello, Andrea De Mauro, and Emanuela Scarmozzino. 2017. A systematic literature review on intangible assets and open innovation. Knowledge Management Research & Practice 15, 1 (Feb. 2017), 90–100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Benjamin Grossman-Kahn and Ryan Rosensweig. 2012. Skip The Silver Bullet: Driving Innovation Through Small Bets And Diverse Practices. LEADING THROUGH DESIGN (2012), 815–829.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kavitha Gurusamy, Narayanan Srinivasaraghavan, and Sisira Adikari. 2016. An Integrated Framework for Design Thinking and Agile Methods for Digital Transformation. In Design, User Experience, and Usability: Design Thinking and Methods, Aaron Marcus (Ed.). Vol. 9746. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 34–42. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-40409-7_4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lotta Hassi and Miko Laakso. 2011. Conceptions of Design Thinking in the design and management discourses. In Proceedings of IASDR2011, the 4th world conference on design research, Delft. 1–10. http://www.mindspace.fi/wp-content/ uploads/2013/12/HassiLaakso_IASDR_FINAL.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Tobias Hildenbrand and Johannes Meyer. 2012. Intertwining Lean and Design Thinking: Software Product Development from Empathy to Shipment. In Software for People: Fundamentals, Trends and Best Practices, Alexander Maedche, Achim Botzenhardt, and Ludwig Neer (Eds.). Springer, 217–237.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Tom Kelley and David Kelley. 2013. Creative confidence: Unleashing the creative potential within us all. Currency.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lucy Kimbell. 2011. Rethinking Design Thinking: Part I. Design and Culture 3, 3 (Nov. 2011), 285–306.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Vijay Kumar. 2012. 101 design methods: A structured approach for driving innovation in your organization. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jeanne Liedtka. 2015. Perspective: Linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management 32, 6 (2015), 925–938.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Tilmann Lindberg, Eva Köppen, Ingo Rauth, and Christoph Meinel. 2012. On the perception, adoption and implementation of design thinking in the IT industry. In Design thinking research. Springer, 229–240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Tilmann Lindberg, Christoph Meinel, and Ralf Wagner. 2011. Design Thinking: A Fruitful Concept for IT Development? In Design Thinking, Christoph Meinel, Larry Leifer, and Hasso Plattner (Eds.). Springer, 3–18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Pietro Micheli, Joe Jaina, Keith Goffin, Fred Lemke, and Roberto Verganti. 2012. Perceptions of Industrial Design: The “Means” and the “Ends”: Perceptions of Industrial Design. Journal of Product Innovation Management 29, 5 (Sept. 2012), 687–704.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Wanda J Orlikowski and Jack J Baroudi. 1991. Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information systems research 2, 1 (1991), 1–28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Tina Øvad Pedersen. 2016. UX Toolbox for Software Developers. (2016). http: //vbn.aau.dk/ws/files/233641245/PHD_Tina_Oevad_Pedersen_E_pdf_1_.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. PG Rowe. 1987. Design Thinking. Vol. 28. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Donald A Schön. 1983. The reflective practitionerhow professionals think in action. Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Herbert A Simon. 1996. The sciences of the artificial. MIT press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Osama Sohaib, Hiralkumari Solanki, Navkiran Dhaliwa, Walayat Hussain, and Muhammad Asif. 2018. Integrating design thinking into extreme programming. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing (July 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Robert E Stake. 2013. Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. d.school Stanford. 2010. An Introduction to Design Thinking - Process Guide.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Marc Stickdorn, Jakob Schneider, Kate Andrews, and Adam Lawrence. 2011. This is service design thinking: Basics, tools, cases. Vol. 1. Wiley Hoboken, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd edition ed.). Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Richard Thorpe, Robin Holt, Allan Macpherson, and Luke Pittaway. 2005. Using knowledge within small and medium-sized firms: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews 7, 4 (Dec. 2005), 257–281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Anja Wölbling, Kira Krämer, Clemens N. Buss, Katrin Dribbisch, Peter LoBue, and Abraham Taherivand. 2012. Design Thinking: An Innovative Concept for Developing User-Centered Software. In Software for People: Fundamentals, Trends and Best Practices. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 121–136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Design thinking in practice: understanding manifestations of design thinking in software engineering

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            ESEC/FSE 2019: Proceedings of the 2019 27th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering
            August 2019
            1264 pages
            ISBN:9781450355728
            DOI:10.1145/3338906

            Copyright © 2019 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 12 August 2019

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate112of543submissions,21%

            Upcoming Conference

            FSE '24

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader