skip to main content
10.1145/3340017.3340020acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiceegConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improving C2G Relation Using BPMN Diagrams

Published:18 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Procedures applicable in C2G relations are sometimes complex and incomprehensible to an average citizen. The purpose of this article is the assessment of the possibility of using a formal business process graphical notation to improve understanding of administrative procedures by citizens. Such diagrams can also provide the developers of e-government applications with materials useful for requirements analysis. The procedure of a car registration by a buyer was described using the BPMN standard diagrams: the public process and the collaboration. The ease of understanding and comprehensiveness of the graphic description in relation to the text description was evaluated in a survey. The graphic description was easier to understand than the text description. However, the combination of the diagram with the text description was sufficiently comprehensive to start the registration procedure for the largest number of respondents.

References

  1. Chmielarz, W., and Szumski, O. 2017. E-government Usage by Polish Citizens. In Information Technology for Management. Ongoing Research and Development. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing 311, 96--113. Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Dwivedi, Y. K., Wastell, D., Laumer, S., Henriksen, H. Z., Myers, M. D., Bunker, D., Elbana, A., Ravishankar, M. N., and Srivastava, S. C. 2015. Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions. Information Systems Frontiers 17, 1, 143--157. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. European Commission 2016. eGovernment in Poland. Edition 18.1 (June 2016). https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/inline-files/eGovernment_Poland_June_2016_v4_01.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Farmer, D. J. 1995. The language of public administration: Bureaucracy, modernity, and postmodernity. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, AL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Freund, J., Rücker, B. 2014. Real-life BPMN. Using BPMN 2.0 to Analyze, Improve, and Automate Processes in Your Company. 2nd Edition. Camunda.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Haisjackl, C., Pinggera, J., Soffer, P., Zugal, S., Lim, S. Y., and Weber, B. 2015. Identifying quality issues in BPMN models: an exploratory study. In Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 214, 217--230. Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Kasiewicz, S., and Kurkliński, L. 2014. Problems of regulations for SME in Poland--institutional and cultural context. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting 3, 2, 67--78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Marco-Simó, J.M., Pastor, J.A., Macau, R. 2008. Public procurement of IS/IT services: past research and future challenges. In Open IT-Based Innovation: Moving Towards Cooperative IT Transfer and Knowledge Diffusion, G. León, A.M. Bernardos, J.R. Casar, K. Kautz, and J.I. De Gross, Eds. Springer, New York, NY, 443--460.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. NIK 2018. Information on the results of the audit. Implementation of the Central Register of Vehicles and Drivers System (in Polish). Najwyższa Izba Kontroli (Supreme Audit Office), Warsaw.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. OMG 2011. Business Process Model and Notation. Version 2.0. Object Management Group.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Oniszczuk, D., Rafalski, M. 2017. E-administration in Poland - how far is it to reach the level of EU (in Polish), Economic Problems of Services 126(2), 385--396.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Podczaszy, J. 2015. Ignorantia iuris nocet. On the common ignorance of the law (in Polish). Annals of Social Sciences 43, 4, 33--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Polak, P. 2013. Applying Business Process Approach to Information Systems -- the Case of Public Administration. The Journal of Management and Finance 11,3 (September, 2013), 168--178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Polak, P. 2017. Problems of the Use of Information Systems Supporting the Conduct of General Elections (in Polish). Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals 45, 67--77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Pukas, A. 2015. Research and creation of the citizen/customer satisfaction in public administration -- possibilities and limitations (in Polish). Scientific Journal of the University of Szczecin, the Problems of Management, Finance and Marketing 867/40, 289--299.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Silver, B. 2011. BPMN Method and Style: with BPMN Implementer's Guide. Second edition. Cody-Cassidy Press, Aptos, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sung, E., and Mayer, R. E. 2012. When graphics improve liking but not learning from online lessons. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 5 (Sept. 2012), 1618--1625. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Improving C2G Relation Using BPMN Diagrams

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICEEG '19: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on E-commerce, E-Business and E-Government
        June 2019
        113 pages
        ISBN:9781450362375
        DOI:10.1145/3340017

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 June 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader