skip to main content
10.1145/3340017.3340028acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiceegConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Outcome Expectations of Promocode in Mobile Shopping Apps: An Integrative Behavioral and Social Cognitive Perspective

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study examined consumer's expectation on the usefulness of promocode within the shopping apps. Consumers learned about the availability of promocode from searching, media exposure and their collaboration with other consumers. Hence, there is a need to investigate the influence of the social cognitive elements in achieving sales via promocode. This study developed an integrative framework, which combined both Theory of Planned Behaviour and Social Cognitive Theory to examine the underlying factors in the use of promocode. A sample of 266 consumers was surveyed through questionnaire. Their responses were analyzed through Structural Equation Modelling. The hypothesized relationships between attitude towards behavior, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control mediated the linkages of self-efficacy and outcome expectations to the adoption of the promocode. These results showed that social cognitive outcome expectations and self-efficacy explain consumer's competent use of promocode available in the shopping apps. This study provided an integrative framework in predicting the use of promocode in shopping apps. It also explained the use of promocode from consumer cognitive perspective.

References

  1. Kim, M., et al., 2017. Mobile Shopping Through Applications: Understanding Application Possession and Mobile Purchase. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 39, 55--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Cameron, D., C. Gregory, and D. Battaglia, Nielsen, 2012. personalizes the mobile shopping app. Journal of Advertising Research, 52(3), 333--338.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Hui, S.K., et al., 2013. The effect of in-store travel distance on unplanned spending: Applications to mobile promotion strategies. Journal of Marketing, 77(2), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Gao, L., Waechter, K. A. and Bai, X. 2015. Understanding consumers' continuance intention towards mobile purchase: A theoretical framework and empirical study--A case of China. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 249--262. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cheng, H.-H. and Huang, S.-W. 2010. Exploring antecedents and consequence of online group-buying intention: An extended perspective on theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Information Management, 33(1), 185--198.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Li, X., 2018. Impact of Average Rating on Social Media Endorsement: The Moderating Role of Rating Dispersion and Discount Threshold. Information Systems Research, 29(3), 525--577. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Sniehotta, F., 2009. An experimental test of the theory of planned behavior. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 1(2), 257--270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Yoon, H.-J. and Tourassi, G. 2014. Analysis of online social networks to understand information sharing behaviors through social cognitive theory. in Biomedical Science and Engineering Center Conference (BSEC), Annual Oak Ridge National Laboratory. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lin, T.-C. and Huang, C.-C. 2008. Understanding knowledge management system usage antecedents: An integration of social cognitive theory and task technology fit. Information & Management, 45(6), 410--417. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hicks, M., 2003. System and method for providing customers seeking a product or service at a specified discount in a specified geographic area with information as to suppliers offering the same, Google Patents.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Bonera, M., 2011. The propensity of e-commerce usage: the influencing variables. Management Research Review, 34(7), 821--837.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Bei, L.-T. and Chen, M.-Y. 2015. The effects of hedonic and utilitarian bidding values on e-auction behavior. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(4), 483--507. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Toufaily, E., Ricard, L. and Perrien, J. 2013. Customer loyalty to a commercial website: Descriptive meta-analysis of the empirical literature and proposal of an integrative model. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1436--1447.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Lu, J., 2014. Are personal innovativeness and social influence critical to continue with mobile commerce? Internet Research, 24(2), 134--159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Rodríguez-Torrico, P., Cabezudo, R. S. J. and San-Martín, S. 2017. Tell me what they are like and I will tell you where they buy. An analysis of omnichannel consumer behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 465--471. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Khalifa, M. and Shen, K. N. 2008. Drivers for transactional B2C m-commerce adoption: Extended theory of planned behavior. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(3), 111--117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Aboelmaged, M. and Gebba, T. R. 2013. Mobile banking adoption: an examination of technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Business Research and Development, 2(1), 16--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Goyal, A., et al., 2013. Customer usage intention of mobile commerce in India: an empirical study. Journal of Indian Business Research, 5(1), 52--72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Bhattacherjee, A., 2000. Acceptance of e-commerce services: the case of electronic brokerages. IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics-Part A: Systems and humans, 30(4), 411--420. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ajzen, I., 2015. The theory of planned behaviour is alive and well, and not ready to retire: a commentary on Sniehotta, Presseau, and Araújo-Soares. Health Psychology Review, 9(2), 131--137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Davis, L.Y., 2013. Let us go shopping: exploring Northwest Chinese consumers' shopping experiences. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(4), 353--359.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Bandura, A., 1982. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Huang, Q., et al., 2017. Understanding buyers' loyalty to a C2C platform: the roles of social capital, satisfaction and perceived effectiveness of e-commerce institutional mechanisms. Information Systems Journal, 27(1), 91--119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Filieri, R., F. McLeay, and B. Tsui, 2017. Antecedents of travellers' satisfaction and purchase intention from social commerce websites, in Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism, S.B. Schegg R., Editor. Springer: Cham. 517-528.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Plotnikoff, R. C., et al., 2013. Social cognitive theories used to explain physical activity behavior in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Preventive medicine, 56(5), 245--253.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Huang, C.-C., Lin, T.-C. and Lin, K.-J. 2009. Factors affecting pass-along email intentions (PAEIs): Integrating the social capital and social cognition theories. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8(3), 160--169. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Hsu, M.-H., et al., 2007. Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International journal of human-computer studies, 65(2), 153--169. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Chang, I.-C., Liu, C.-C. and Chen, K. 2014. The effects of hedonic/utilitarian expectations and social influence on continuance intention to play online games. Internet Research, 24(1), 21--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Ajzen, I., 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179--211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Sheppard, B. H., Jon, H. and Warshaw, P. R. 1988. The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 325--343.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Liaw, S.-S. and Huang, H.-M. 2013. Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60(1), 14--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Amaro, S. and Duarte, P. 2015. An integrative model of consumers' intentions to purchase travel online. Tourism management, 46(1): p. 64-79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee, J. and Hong, I. B. 2016. Predicting positive user responses to social media advertising: The roles of emotional appeal, informativeness, and creativity. International Journal of Information Management, 36(3), 360--373. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Baker, R. K. and White, K. M. 2010. Predicting adolescents' use of social networking sites from an extended theory of planned behaviour perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1591--1597. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186--204.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Bock, G.-W., et al., 2005. Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS quarterly, 29(1), 87--111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Yang, K., 2012. Consumer technology traits in determining mobile shopping adoption: An application of the extended theory of planned behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19(5), 484--491.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Madden, C. S., Caballero, M. J. and Matsukubo, S. 1986. Analysis of information content in US and Japanese magazine advertising. Journal of Advertising, 15(3), 38--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Kang, H., et al., 2006. Effects of perceived behavioral control on the consumer usage intention of e-coupons. Psychology & Marketing, 23(10), 841--864.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Kesari, B. and Atulkar, S. 2016. Satisfaction of mall shoppers: A study on perceived utilitarian and hedonic shopping values. Journal of Retailing and Consumer services, 31, 22--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. 1992. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of applied social psychology, 22(14), 1111--1132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Cheng, Y.-H. and Ho, H.-Y. 2015. Social influence's impact on reader perceptions of online reviews. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 883--887.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Soares, A. M. and Pinho, J. C. 2014. Advertising in online social networks: the role of perceived enjoyment and social influence. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 8(3), 245--263.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Lu, J.-L., Chou, H.-Y., and Ling, P.-C. 2009. Investigating passengers' intentions to use technology-based self check-in services. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 45(2), 345--356.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Rouibah, K., Lowry, P. B., and Hwang, Y. 2016. The effects of perceived enjoyment and perceived risks on trust formation and intentions to use online payment systems: New perspectives from an Arab country. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 19, 33--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Sun, H. and Zhang, P. 2006. Causal relationships between perceived enjoyment and perceived ease of use: An alternative approach. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(9), 618--645.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Sarkar, A., 2011. Impact of utilitarian and hedonic shopping values on individual's perceived benefits and risks in online shopping. International management review, 7(1), 58--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Kivetz, R. and Zheng, Y. 2017. The effects of promotions on hedonic versus utilitarian purchases. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 59--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. San-Martín, S., Prodanova, J. and Jiménez, N. 2015. The impact of age in the generation of satisfaction and WOM in mobile shopping. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 23, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Kukar-Kinney, M. and Carlson, J. R. 2015. A fresh look at consumers' discounting of discounts in online and bricks-and-mortar shopping contexts. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32(4), 442--444.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., and Sarstedt, M. 2015. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43(1), 115--135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Henseler, J. and Sarstedt, M. 2013. Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Computational Statistics, 28(2), 565--580. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Henseler, J., Hubona, G. and Ray, P. A. 2016. Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial management & data systems, 116(1), 2--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Podsakoff, P.M., et al., 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. McCloskey, D., 2004. Evaluating electronic commerce acceptance with the technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44(2), 49--57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Lin, C.P. and Bhattacherjee, A. 2010. Extending technology usage models to interactive hedonic technologies: a theoretical model and empirical test. Information Systems Journal, 20(2), 163--181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Sun, Y., et al., 2014. Understanding Chinese users' continuance intention toward online social networks: an integrative theoretical model. Electronic Markets, 24(1), 57--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Hsu, C.-L. and Lin, J.C.-C. 2015. What drives purchase intention for paid mobile apps?--An expectation confirmation model with perceived value. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 14(1), 46--57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Xu, C., Peak, D. and Prybutok, V. 2015. A customer value, satisfaction, and loyalty perspective of mobile application recommendations. Decision Support Systems, 79, 171--183. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The Outcome Expectations of Promocode in Mobile Shopping Apps: An Integrative Behavioral and Social Cognitive Perspective

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEEG '19: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on E-commerce, E-Business and E-Government
      June 2019
      113 pages
      ISBN:9781450362375
      DOI:10.1145/3340017

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 June 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader