skip to main content
10.1145/3340481.3342738acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Hub companies shaping the future: the ethicality and corporate social responsibility of platform economy giants

Published: 26 August 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Hub companies (e.g. Amazon, Facebook, Apple, Twitter and Google) rule the internet. They are de facto monopolies in their area of operations. They shape the future in which we live. And, it seems there is nothing we can do about that, as traditional economies of extreme scale – in which eventually the size of a corporation starts to be a hindrance, rather than an advantage – do not apply to them. On the contrary, they keep growing and growing and thus gaining stronger and stronger strangle hold over their respective areas of commerce and influence. This leads to unethical results, where the corporations spin out of any control, national or international. In this paper we give reasons to this phenomenon and lament the future of the internet – unless something drastic is done to change this.

References

[1]
Amazon.com, Inc. (2017, February 2). FY16-Q4 for the Period Ending December 31, 2016.
[2]
Retrieved from http://phx.corporateir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=97664&p=irol-reportsother
[3]
Alphabet, Inc. (2016, October 27). Alphabet Announces Third Quarter 2016 Results Retrieved from https://abc.xyz/investor/news/earnings/2016/Q3_alphabet_earnings/
[4]
Fortune. (2017). The Fortune 500's 10 Most Profitable Companies. Fortune.
[5]
Gupta, S. (2018). Driving Digital Strategy: A Guide to Reimagining Your Business (1st ed.). Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
[6]
Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2017). Managing Our Hub Economy. Harvard Business Review, 84-92.
[7]
Galloway, S. (2017). The Four - The Hidden DNA of Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google. London: Transworld Publishers.
[8]
Trainer, D. (2018, August 27). Bursting Snap's (Micro) Bubble. Retrieved from Forbes.com: https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2018/08/27/bursting-snapsmicro-bubble/#92a1b5718860
[9]
Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press.
[10]
Smith, A. (1759). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Edinburgh: printed for Andrew Millar, in the Strand; and Alexander Kincaid and J. Bell, in Edinburgh.
[11]
Bowie, N. (1982). Business Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
[12]
Kassoy, A., Houlahan, B., & Gilbert, J. C. (2016). Impact governance and management: Fulfilling the promise of capitalism to achieve a shared and IWSiB ’19, August 26, 2019, Tallinn, Estonia Hanna Härkönen, Juhani Naskali, Kai Kimppa durable prosperity. nter for Effective Public Management’s Initiative on 21st Century Capitalism, 1-18.
[13]
Shum, P. K., & Yam, S. L. (2011). Ethics and law: Guiding the invisible hand to correct corporate social responsibility externalities. Journal of business ethics, 98(4), 549-571. {13} Rawls, J. (1972). A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[14]
Rawls, J. (1972). A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[15]
Buchanan, D., & Huczynski, A. (2010). Organizational Behaviour. Pearson Education.
[16]
Carminati, L. (2019). Between ethics and law: TNCs’ behaviour in modern economic globalisation. Society and Business Review, 2-11.
[17]
Otusanya, O. (2011). The role of multinational companies in tax evasion and tax avoidance: the case of Nigeria. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 316-322.
[18]
Levi, M. (1989). Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.
[19]
Christensen, J., & Murphy, R. (2004). The social irresponsibility of corporate tax avoidance: taking CSR to the bottom line”, society for international. Development, 37-44.
[20]
Zsolt, B., & Laszlo, Z. (2016). The failure of business ethics. Society and Business Review, 93-104.
[21]
Samuels, W. J. (2011). Erasing the invisible hand : essays on an elusive and misused concept in economics. Cambridge University Press 2011.
[22]
Frederick, W. C. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility: From Founders to Millennials. Corporate Social Responsibility, 3 - 38.
[23]
Yle. (2018, October 12). Googlen, Amazonin ja Facebookin ylivoima on valtava ongelma ja yhdysvaltalaisprofessorin mukaan jätit on pilkottava – suomalaisyrittäjä: "Isot jätit toimivat ihan miten niitä huvittaa". Retrieved from https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-10430076
[24]
Khan, L. M. (2017). Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox. The Yale Law Journal, 564-907.
[25]
Lewitt, M. (2018, May 1). How Long Can Amazon's Ingenious Antitrust Avoidance Last? Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaellewitt/2018/05/01/how-long-canamazons-ingenious-antitrust-avoidance-last/#8325f0c70ac0
[26]
Quairel‐Lanoizelée, F. (2011). Are competition and corporate social responsibility compatible?: The myth of sustainable competitive advantage. Society and Business Review, 77-98.
[27]
Yle. (2019, February 15). Amazon perui uuden pääkonttorin rakentamisen New Yorkiin – syynä asukkaiden vastustus. Retrieved from https://yle.fi/uutiset/3- 10647600
[28]
Amazon.com, Inc. (2019). Amazon - Our Company. Retrieved from https://www.aboutamazon.com/our-company
[29]
Zuckerberg, M. (2017, June 22). Bringing the world closer together. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/zuck/posts/10154944663901634 {1} FNM Surname (2018). Article Title. Journal Title, 10(3), 1–10.
[30]
New York Times. (2018, Oct. 9). Why Some Amazon Workers Are Fuming About Their Raise. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/09/technology/amazonworkers-pay-raise.html

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Ethical Framework for the Software Development Process: A Systematic Mapping StudyInformation Systems and Technologies10.1007/978-3-031-45642-8_14(144-154)Online publication date: 16-Feb-2024
  • (2020)ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Software-Intensive BusinessACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes10.1145/3375572.337557745:1(18-20)Online publication date: 22-Jan-2020

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IWSiB 2019: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Software-Intensive Business: Start-ups, Platforms, and Ecosystems
August 2019
59 pages
ISBN:9781450368544
DOI:10.1145/3340481
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 August 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. CSR
  2. Ethics
  3. Hub Companies
  4. de facto Monopolies

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ESEC/FSE '19
Sponsor:

Upcoming Conference

ICSE 2025

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Ethical Framework for the Software Development Process: A Systematic Mapping StudyInformation Systems and Technologies10.1007/978-3-031-45642-8_14(144-154)Online publication date: 16-Feb-2024
  • (2020)ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Software-Intensive BusinessACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes10.1145/3375572.337557745:1(18-20)Online publication date: 22-Jan-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media