skip to main content
10.1145/3340531.3412708acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Generating Full Spatiotemporal Vehicular Paths: A Data Fusion Approach

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Vehicular path flow (trajectories) is an important data source for smart mobility, from which many road traffic parameters can be inferred. However, it has been a long-existing challenge that single source of trajectory data is biased in terms of its spatiotemporal coverage. In this paper, we leverage two types of large traffic datasets - point flows and sample trajectories - to generate the full city-scale vehicular paths. Our method consists of a low-granularity data fusion (LGDF) module, which uses point flow data to estimate the sparse paths that pass through some specific links (where sensors are mounted), and a high-granularity model training (HGMT) component, which uses sample trajectory data to pre-train a bi-gram sequence generation model. Afterwards, the results from LGDF and HGMT are combined to produce detailed on-road spatiotemporal paths. In this way, the data safety of single trajectory is protected while the full-scale city traffic can be reproduced for transportation analytics. The proposed method is verified via real-data case studies. As a result, starting from August 2019, this method has been implemented in Alibaba's city brain project and successively deployed in many cities in China for the purpose of traffic analysis and optimization.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3340531.3412708.mp4

mp4

13.5 MB

References

  1. Yousra A.A.S. Aldeen and Mazleena Salleh. 2019. Chapter 10 - Techniques for Privacy Preserving Data Publication in the Cloud for Smart City Applications. In Smart Cities Cybersecurity and Privacy, Danda B. Rawat and Kayhan Z. Ghafoor (Eds.). Elsevier, 129 -- 145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Gowtham Atluri, Anuj Karpatne, and Vipin Kumar. 2018. Spatio-temporal data mining: A survey of problems and methods. Comput. Surveys, Vol. 51, 4 (2018), 1--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Michael G.H. Bell. 1991. The real time estimation of origin-destination flows in the presence of platoon dispersion. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 25, 2 (1991), 115--125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Michael G.H. Bell, Chris Cassir, Sergio Grosso, and Stuart J. Clement. 1997. Path flow estimation in traffic system management. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, Vol. 30, 8 (1997), 1247--1252.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Francesco Calabrese, Mi Diao, Giusy Di Lorenzo, Joseph Ferreira Jr, and Carlo Ratti. 2013. Understanding individual mobility patterns from urban sensing data: A mobile phone trace example. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 26 (2013), 301--313.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Peng Cao, Tomio Miwa, Toshiyuki Yamamoto, and Takayuki Morikawa. 2013. Bilevel generalized least squares estimation of dynamic origin--destination matrix for urban network with probe vehicle data. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2333, 1 (2013), 66--73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Ennio Cascetta and Sang Nguyen. 1988. A unified framework for estimating or updating origin/destination matrices from traffic counts. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 22, 6 (1988), 437--455.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Enrique Castillo, José M. Menéndez, and Pilar Jiménez. 2008. Trip matrix and path flow reconstruction and estimation based on plate scanning and link observations. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 42, 5 (2008), 455--481.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Palash Goyal and Emilio Ferrara. 2018. Graph embedding techniques, applications, and performance: A survey. Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 151 (2018), 78--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Thomas Holleczek, Liang Yu, Joseph K. Lee, Oliver Senn, Carlo Ratti, and Patrick Jaillet. 2014. Detecting weak public transport connections from cellphone and public transport data. In 2014 International Conference on Big Data Science and Computing. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Daniel Jurafsky and James H. Martin. 2009. Speech and Language Processing. Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Michael J. Maher. 1983. Inferences on trip matrices from observations on link volumes: A Bayesian statistical approach. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 17, 6 (1983), 435--447.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Adolf D. May. 1990. Traffic Flow Fundamentals. Prentice Hall. 89039687Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Chuishi Meng, Xiuwen Yi, Lu Su, Jing Gao, and Yu Zheng. 2017. City-wide traffic volume inference with loop detector data and taxi trajectories. In 25th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Tomas Mikolov, Martin Karafiát, Lukás Burget, Jan Cernocký, and Sanjeev Khudanpur. 2010. Recurrent neural network based language model. In INTERSPEECH. 1045--1048.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Pierre Robillard. 1975. Estimating the O-D matrix from observed link volumes. Transportation Research, Vol. 9, 2 (1975), 123--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Yuanhui Sun and Yaying Zhang. 2016. Path restoring algorithm based on vehicle trajectory mining. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data Analysis (2016), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Xianfeng Yang, Yang Lu, and Wei Hao. 2017. Origin-destination estimation using probe vehicle trajectory and link counts. Journal of Advanced Transportation (2017), 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Liang Yu, Wei Wu, Xiaohui Li, Guangxia Li, Wee Siong Ng, See-Kiong Ng, Zhongwen Huang, Anushiya Arunan, and Hui Min Watt. 2015. iVizTRANS: Interactive visual learning for home and work place detection from massive public transportation data. In 2015 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology. 49--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Liang Yu, Jinqiang Yu, Maolei Zhang, Xin Zhang, Yuehu Liu, Hui Zhang, and Wanli Min. 2019. Large scale traffic signal network optimization - A paradigm shift driven by big data. In 35th IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering. 1832--1840.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Yan Zhao, Wai Wong, Jianfeng Zheng, Shihong Huang, and Henry X. Liu. 2019. OD estimation using probe vehicle trajectories. In Transportation Research Board 98th Annual Meeting. 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Yu Zheng. 2015. Trajectory data mining: An overview. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. 6, 3 (2015), 1--41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Xuesong Zhou and Hani S. Mahmassani. 2006. Dynamic origin-destination demand estimation using automatic vehicle identification data. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 7, 1 (2006), 105--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Li Zhu, Fei R. Yu, Yige Wang, Bin Ning, and Tao Tang. 2019. Big data analytics in intelligent transportation systems: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 20, 1 (2019), 383--398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Henk J. Van Zuylen and Luis G. Willumsen. 1980. The most likely trip matrix estimated from traffic counts. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 14, 3 (1980), 281--293.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Generating Full Spatiotemporal Vehicular Paths: A Data Fusion Approach

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '20: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management
      October 2020
      3619 pages
      ISBN:9781450368599
      DOI:10.1145/3340531

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 October 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader