skip to main content
10.1145/3340531.3418511acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Detecting and Measuring the Exposure of Children and Adolescents to Inappropriate Comments in YouTube

Published:19 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social media platforms have been growing at a rapid pace, attracting users engagement with contents due to their convenience facilitated by many usable features. Such platforms provide users with interactive options such as likes, dislikes as well as a way of expressing their opinions in the form of text (i.e., comments). The ability of posting comments on these online platforms has allowed some users to post racist, obscene, as well as to spread hate on these platforms. In some cases, this kind of toxic behavior might turn the comment section from a space where users can share their views to a place where hate and profanity are spread. Such issues are observed across various social media platforms and many users are often exposed to these kinds of behaviors which requires comment moderators to spend a lot of time filtering out such inappropriate comments. Moreover, such textual "inappropriate contents" can be targeted towards users irrespective of age, concerning variety of topics (not only controversial), and triggered by various events. My doctoral dissertation work, therefore, is primarily focused on studying, detecting and analyzing users exposure to this kind of toxicity on different social media platforms utilizing the state-of-art techniques in deep learning and natural language processing. This paper presents one example of my works on detecting and measuring kids exposure to inappropriate comments posted on YouTube videos targeting young users. In the meantime, the same pipeline is being examined for measuring users interaction with mainstream news media and sentiment towards various topics in the public discourse in light of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID'19).

References

  1. Sultan Alshamrani, Mohammed Abuhamad, Ahmed Abusnaina, and David Mohaisen. 2020. Investigating Online Toxicity in Users Interactions with the Mainstream Media Channels on YouTube. In MAISoN2020 5th International Workshop on Mining Actionable Insights from Social Networks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Yoshua Bengio. 2009. Learning Deep Architectures for AI. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, Vol. 2, 1 (2009), 1--127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. CommonSenseMedia. 2020. Common Sense Media. www.commonsensemedia.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. FamilyZone. 2020. FamilyZone. https://www.familyzone.com/au/families/blog/what-kids-did-online-2016Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Urs Gasser, Sandra Cortesi, Momin M Malik, and Ashley Lee. 2012. Youth and digital media: From credibility to information quality. Berkman Center Research Publication 2012--1 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Rishabh Kaushal, Srishty Saha, Payal Bajaj, and Ponnurangam Kumaraguru. 2016. KidsTube: Detection, characterization and analysis of child unsafe content & promoters on YouTube. In the 14th Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST). 157--164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Kostantinos Papadamou, Antonis Papasavva, Savvas Zannettou, Jeremy Blackburn, Nicolas Kourtellis, Ilias Leontiadis, Gianluca Stringhini, and Michael Sirivianos. 2019. Disturbed youtube for kids: Characterizing and detecting disturbing content on youtube. arXiv:1901.07046 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ranker. 2020. Ranker. https://www.ranker.com/crowdranked-list/my-favorite-cartoons-of-all-time?ref=searchGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jü rgen Schmidhuber. 2015. Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Networks, Vol. 61 (2015), 85--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Smith, Aaron and Toor, Skye and Kessel, Patric Van. 2020. Many Turn to YouTube for Children's Content, News, How-To Lessons. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/11/07/many-turn-to-youtube-for-childrens-content-news-how-to-lessons/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Rashid Tahir, Faizan Ahmed, Hammas Saeed, Shiza Ali, Fareed Zaffar, and Christo Wilson. 2019. Bringing the Kid back into YouTube Kids: Detecting Inappropriate Content on Video Streaming Platforms. In IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Detecting and Measuring the Exposure of Children and Adolescents to Inappropriate Comments in YouTube

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CIKM '20: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management
          October 2020
          3619 pages
          ISBN:9781450368599
          DOI:10.1145/3340531

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 19 October 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

          Upcoming Conference

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader