skip to main content
10.1145/3340764.3344906acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmundcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

A Human-Centered Design Process for an Augmented Reality based Training System

Published:08 September 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this paper is to present a research proposal for an AR-based assembly training system. Findings from previous user studies on AR-based assembly training and their limitations are analyzed. Research questions are drafted and a research proposal for future research of an AR-based assembly training within the frame of a user study is presented. An iterative human-centered design process is proposed that integrates both production employees as well as training content creators (e.g. trainers or foremen) as end users in a co-creation process of an industrial assembly training system, which has not been done in previous studies. Including user groups in the early stages of the process will help to understand different user needs and requirements for an AR-based assembly training system that will be evaluated in an industrial training setting. A co-creation workshop according to the Design Sprint process is proposed to integrate different key users in the development process of the AR-based assembly training system. The final aim of this research project is to gain insights of how an assembly training system should be designed in order to create real value for the different users and the organization.

References

  1. Funk, M., Kosch, T., and Schmidt, A. 2016. Interactive worker assistance. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing - UbiComp '16. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 934--939. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Hořejší, P. 2015. Augmented Reality System for Virtual Training of Parts Assembly. Procedia Engineering 100, 699--706.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Werrlich, S., Daniel, A., Ginger, A., Nguyen, P.-A., and Notni, G. 2018. Comparing HMD-Based and Paper-Based Training. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. {Munich, Germany, 16-20 October 2018}. IEEE Computer Society, Conference Publishing Services, Los Alamitos, California, 134--142.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Azuma, R. T. 1997. A Survey of Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6, 4, 355--385. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Syberfeldt, A., Holm, M., Danielsson, O., Wang, L., and Brewster, R. L. 2016. Support Systems on the Industrial Shop-floors of the Future -- Operators' Perspective on Augmented Reality. Procedia CIRP 44, 108--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Karlsson, I., Bernedixen, J., Ng, A. H.C., and Pehrsson, L. 2018. Combining augmented reality and simulation-based optimization for decision support in manufacturing. In WSC. 2017 Winter Simulation Conference: 3-6 December 2017. IEEE, New York, 3988--3999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. van Krevelen, D. 2007. Augmented Reality: Technologies, Applications, and Limitations, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kipper, G. and Rampolla, J. 2013. Augmented reality. An emerging technologies guide to AR. Syngress, Waltham, Mass. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Peddie, J. 2017. Augmented Reality. Springer International Publishing, Cham. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Doshi, A., Smith, R. T., Thomas, B. H., and Bouras, C. 2017. Use of projector based augmented reality to improve manual spot-welding precision and accuracy for automotive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89, 5-8, 1279--1293.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., and MacIntyre, B. 2001. Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Comput. Grap. Appl. 21, 6, 34--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Braly, A. M., Nuernberger, B., and Kim, S. Y. 2019. Augmented Reality Improves Procedural Work on an International Space Station Science Instrument. Human factors, 18720818824464.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hou, L. and Wang, X. 2013. A study on the benefits of augmented reality in retaining working memory in assembly tasks: A focus on differences in gender. Automation in Construction 32, 38--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Werrlich, S., Lorber, C., Nguyen, P.-A., Yanez, C. E. F., and Notni, G. 2018. Assembly Training: Comparing the Effects of Head-Mounted Displays and Face-to-Face Training. In Virtual, augmented and mixed reality. Interaction, navigation, visualization, embodiment, and simulation: 10th International Conference, VAMR 2018, held as part of HCI International 2018, Las Vegas, NV, USA, July 15-20, 2018: proceedings, part I, J. Y.C. Chen and G. Fragomeni, Eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 10909. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 462--476.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hart, S. G. and Staveland, L. E. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In Human Mental Workload, P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati, Eds. Advances in Psychology v. 52. Elsevier textbooks, s.l., 139--183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hart, S. G. 2006. Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 50, 9, 904--908.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., and Miller, J. T. 2008. An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 24, 6, 574--594.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Werrlich, S., Nitsche, K., and Notni, G. 2017. Demand Analysis for an Augmented Reality based Assembly Training. In PETRA 2017. The 10th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments: June 21-23, 2017, Island of Rhodes, Greece. ICPS. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 416--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Bertram, P., Birtel, M., Quint, F., and Ruskowski, M. 2018. Intelligent Manual Working Station through Assistive Systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51, 11, 170--175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Rooden, M. J. 1998. Thinking about thinking aloud. Contemporary Ergonomics, 328--332.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Nisbett, R. E. and Wilson, T. d. 1977. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review 84, 3, 231--259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Ericsson, K. A. and Simon, H. A. 1977. Protocol Analysis. A comparison to cognitive science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Quandt, M., Knoke, B., Gorldt, C., Freitag, M., and Thoben, K.-D. 2018. General Requirements for Industrial Augmented Reality Applications. Procedia CIRP 72, 1130--1135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Knapp, J. 2016. Sprint. How to solve big problems and test new ideas in just five days. Simon and Schuster, New York, N.Y.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., Kinshuk, and Graf, S. 2015. Mobile Augmented Reality in Vocational Education and Training. Procedia Computer Science 75, 49--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. tom Dieck, M. C. and Jung, T. 2019. Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality. Springer International Publishing, Cham. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Hermawati, S., Lawson, G., D'Cruz, M., Arlt, F., Apold, J., Andersson, L., Lövgren, M. G., and Malmsköld, L. 2015. Understanding the complex needs of automotive training at final assembly lines. Applied ergonomics 46 Pt A, 144--157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Murauer, N., Müller, F., Günther, S., Schön, D., Pflanz, N., and Funk, M. 2018. An Analysis of Language Impact on Augmented Reality Order Picking Training. In Proceedings of the 11th PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments Conference on - PETRA '18. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 351--357. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Human-Centered Design Process for an Augmented Reality based Training System

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MuC '19: Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2019
      September 2019
      863 pages
      ISBN:9781450371988
      DOI:10.1145/3340764

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 September 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)25
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader