skip to main content
10.1145/3341162.3344863acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Challenges and lessons learned from implementing longitudinal studies for self-care technology assessment

Published:09 September 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Whilst literature is rich in lessons learned from recruitment and retention of participants in longitudinal studies, papers sharing practical experience of implementing such studies with or about ICT are lacking. We discuss the challenges and lessons learned in four longitudinal studies with older adults and chronic disease patients for the assessment of self-care technology. Despite apparently prosaic, everyday challenges and potential threats to studies with non-mainstream audiences may be hard to anticipate. A reflection by the researchers leading these studies led to three main themes associated to studies' timelines, which are described with practical examples.

References

  1. Ana Correia de Barros, Silvia Rêgo, and João Antunes. 2014. Aspects of human-centred design in HCI with older adults: Experiences from the field. In Human-Centered Software Engineering, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. University of Paderborn, University of Rostock, University of Toulouse, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Springer, 235--242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. John Brooke. 2013. SUS: A Retrospective. J. Usability Studies 8, 2 (Feb. 2013), 29--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Peter Diggle, Patrick Heagerty, Kung-Yee Liang, and Scott Zeger. 2013. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. OUP Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrea Poscia et al. 2017. Methodological issues in the observational studies conducted in older population: a narrative review. Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health 14, 2 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Martha Abshire et al. 2017. Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates. BMC Medical Research Methodology 17, 1 (20 Feb 2017), 30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Frederick F Reichheld. 2004. The One Number you Need to Grow. Harvard business review 81 (06 2004), 46--54, 124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kung-Yee Liang and Scott L. Zeger. 1986. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73, 1 (1986), 13--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Rose McCloskey, Pamela Jarrett, Connie Stewart, and Lisa Keeping-Burke. 2015. Recruitment and Retention Challenges in a Technology-Based Study with Older Adults Discharged from a Geriatric Rehabilitation Unit. Rehabilitation Nursing 40, 4 (2015), 249--259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Marjorie C. McCullagh, Marie-Anne Sanon, and Michael A. Cohen. 2014. Strategies to enhance participant recruitment and retention in research involving a community-based population. Applied Nursing Research 27, 4 (2014), 249--253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Judith C. McHenry, Kathleen C. Insel, Gilles O. Einstein, Amy N. Vidrine, Kari M. Koerner, and Daniel G. Morrow. 2012. Recruitment of Older Adults: Success May Be in the Details. The Gerontologist 55, 5 (08 2012), 845--853.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lona Mody, Douglas Miller, Joanne McGloin, Marcie Freeman, Edward Marcantonio, Jay Magaziner, and Stephanie Studenski. 2008. Recruitment and Retention of Older Adults in Aging Research. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 56, 12 (2008), 2340--2348.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Francisco Nunes, Jorge Ribeiro, Cristiana Braga, and Paula Lopes. 2018. Supporting the Self-care Practices of Shift Workers. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. ACM, 71--81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ricardo Peixoto, Jorge Ribeiro, Eduardo Pereira, Francisco Nunes, and Ana Pereira. 2018. Designing the Smart Badge: A Wearable Device for Hospital Workers. In Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (Pervasive Health '18). EAI.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Véronique Provencher, W. Ben Mortenson, Laurence Tanguay-Garneau, Karine Bélanger, and Marion Dagenais. 2014. Challenges and strategies pertaining to recruitment and retention of frail elderly in research studies: A systematic review. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 59, 1 (2014), 18--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Fernando Rajulton. 2001. The Fundamentals of Longitudinal Research: An Overview. Special Issue on Longitudinal Methodology, Canadian Studies in Population 28, 2 (2001), 169--185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Iman Ridda, Rayna C MacIntyre, Richard I Lindley, and Timothy Tan. 2010. Difficulties in recruiting older people in clinical trials: An examination of barriers and solutions. Vaccine 28, 4 (2010), 901--906.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Kerry Rodden, Hilary Hutchinson, and Xin Fu. 2010. Measuring the User Experience on a Large Scale: User-Centered Metrics for Web Applications. In Proceedings of CHI 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Rachel Thomson and Janet Holland. 2003. Hindsight, foresight and insight: The challenges of longitudinal qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 6, 3 (2003), 233--244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Viswanath Venkatesh and Fred D. Davis. 2000. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science 46, 2 (2000), 186--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Challenges and lessons learned from implementing longitudinal studies for self-care technology assessment

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp/ISWC '19 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
      September 2019
      1234 pages
      ISBN:9781450368698
      DOI:10.1145/3341162

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 September 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader