skip to main content
10.1145/3341162.3348394acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Cohort analyses of in-person interactions in temporally evolving student social groups

Published:09 September 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

In social interaction systems, the formation and testing of theories is significantly difficult because social interaction systems cannot be easily manipulated and controlled. It is also not possible to reproduce large-scale systems in a lab setting or in a short fixed time duration. Detecting short-term non-recurrent interactions between individuals is very different from studying an individual's long term social group(s). However, over the last decade the rate of digital data availability using smartphones and wearables has increased consistently at a high pace which allows social scientists gain a comprehensive understanding of how groups form and evolve over time using recurrent in-person interaction networks. In this paper, we design a long term data-driven study on a finite student population of a residential university campus. Our aim is to study a student's recurrent in-person interactions, or long-term social groups, between the time that one enters into a cohort, e.g. Class of 2022, and until that cohort graduates. In this sensor-data driven study using state-of-the-art interaction-detection algorithms, we monitor parameters such as social group size, formation-time and longevity. We also conduct a retrospective cohort analysis of self-reported social group parameters, e.g. social group size, time spent with each group type and associated satisfaction. Preliminary results from the same make an extremely strong case for a longitudinal study, especially indicated by the evolution of one's social circles over a long period of time.

References

  1. Carol Goodenow. Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 13(1):21--43, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Rachel L Miller-Slough and Julie C Dunsmore. Parent and friend emotion socialization in adolescence: Associations with psychological adjustment. Adolescent Research Review, 1(4):287--305, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Stephanie L Burcusa and William G Iacono. Risk for recurrence in depression. Clinical psychology review, 27(8):959--985, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ronald C Kessler, Richard H Price, and Camille B Wortman. Social factors in psychopathology: Stress, social support, and coping processes. Annual review of psychology, 36(1):531--572, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hilary Silver. Social exclusion and social solidarity: three paradigms. Int'l Lab. Rev., 133:531, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Social Exclusion Unit and Great Britain. Preventing social exclusion. Cabinet Office London, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Rijurekha Sen, Youngki Lee, Kasthuri Jayarajah, Archan Misra, and Rajesh Krishna Balan. Grumon: Fast and accurate group monitoring for heterogeneous urban spaces. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems, pages 46--60. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Siyuan Liu, Shuhui Wang, Kasthuri Jayarajah, Archan Misra, and Ramayya Krishnan. Todmis: Mining communities from trajectories. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management, pages 2109--2118. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Snigdha Das, Soumyajit Chatterjee, Sandip Chakraborty, and Bivas Mitra. Meetsense: A lightweight framework for group identification using smartphones. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING, 14(8):1, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Anshul Rai, Krishna Kant Chintalapudi, Venkata N Padmanabhan, and Rijurekha Sen. Zee: Zero-effort crowdsourcing for indoor localization. In Proceedings of the 18th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, pages 293--304. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Shihua Zhang, Rui-Sheng Wang, and Xiang-Sun Zhang. Identification of overlapping community structure in complex networks using fuzzy c-means clustering. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 374(1):483--490, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. John Bynner. Use of longitudinal data in the study of social exclusion. Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Rajesh Krishna Balan, Archan Misra, and Youngki Lee. Livelabs: Building an in-situ real-time mobile experimentation testbed. In Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, page 14. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Mark Rubin, Olivia Evans, and Ross B Wilkinson. A longitudinal study of the relations among university students' subjective social status, social contact with university friends, and mental health and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 35(9):722--737, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Steven A Beebe and John T Masterson. Communicating in small groups. Pearson Custom Publishing, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Alessandro Montanari, Sarfraz Nawaz, Cecilia Mascolo, and Kerstin Sailer. A study of bluetooth low energy performance for human proximity detection in the workplace. In Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom), 2017 IEEE International Conference on, pages 90--99. IEEE, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Bert H Hodges. chapter: Conformity and divergence in interactions, groups, and culture. The Oxford handbook of social influence, pages 87--95, 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ichiro Kawachi and Lisa F Berkman. Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban health, 78(3):458--467, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Johannes Beller and Adina Wagner. Loneliness, social isolation, their synergistic interaction, and mortality. Health Psychology, 37(9):808, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Andrew Steptoe, Aparna Shankar, Panayotes Demakakos, and Jane Wardle. Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(15):5797--5801, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Ginny Garcia-Alexander, Hyeyoung Woo, and Matthew J Carlson. Social interaction, socialization, and group influence. In Social Foundations of Behavior for the Health Sciences, pages 59--79. Springer, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Gary C Jacobson. The electoral origins of divided government: Competition in US House elections, 1946--1988. Westview Pr, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Roy F Baumeister and Mark R Leary. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological bulletin, 117(3):497, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Sarah-Jayne Blakemore. Development of the social brain in adolescence. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 105(3):111--116, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Julianne Holt-Lunstad, Timothy B Smith, Mark Baker, Tyler Harris, and David Stephenson. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on psychological science, 10(2):227--237, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jean M Twenge, Brian H Spitzburg, and W Keith Campbell. Less in-person social interaction with peers among us adolescents in the 21st century and links to loneliness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, page 0265407519836170, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Kasthuri Jayarajah, Youngki Lee, Archan Misra, and Rajesh Krishna Balan. Need accurate user behaviour?: Pay attention to groups! In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp '15, pages 855--866, New York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Yair Amichai-Hamburger, Mila Kingsbury, and Barry H Schneider. Friendship: An old concept with a new meaning? Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1):33--39, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Maureen T Hallinan. Friendship patterns in open and traditional classrooms. Sociology of Education, pages 254--265, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Robin IM Dunbar, NDC Duncan, and Daniel Nettle. Size and structure of freely forming conversational groups. Human nature, 6(1):67--78, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Cohort analyses of in-person interactions in temporally evolving student social groups

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          UbiComp/ISWC '19 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
          September 2019
          1234 pages
          ISBN:9781450368698
          DOI:10.1145/3341162

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 9 September 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader