skip to main content
10.1145/3341162.3349316acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing interactive interfaces by keeping the natural beauty of public places

Published: 09 September 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Natural, public places in cities serve often as a place for recreation and relaxation. Additionally, such places often signify historic and social importance about which visitors would like to know more. Screens and other currently existing technology would, however, destroy the natural beauty of such a place. Attention-aware and unobtrusive interfaces seem to offer a solution to this problem. In our approach, we conducted a qualitative survey with 19 people and an epoché at a decommissioned cemetery which is mainly used for recreation and leisure time. Overall, the results show that the majority would like to know more about the deceased with the information closely placed to the grave, but without disturbing the natural, mystical atmosphere of the cemetery. In this work in progress report, we present our research approach to attention-aware, unobtrusive and context-sensitive interactive prototypes that keep the natural beauty and recreational characteristics of such a place.

References

[1]
Rajjan Man Chitrakar. 2016. Meaning of Public Space and Sense of Community: The Case of New Neighbourhoods in the Kathmandu Valley. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR 10, 1 (apr 2016), 213--227. http://archnet-ijar.net/index.php/IJAR/article/view/807/pdf
[2]
Sara Santos Cruz, Nikolai Roskamm, and Nadia Charalambous. 2018. Inquiries into public space practices, meanings and values. Journal of Urban Design 23, 6 (2018), 797--802.
[3]
Joanna Häkkilä and Ashley Colley. 2016. Graveyards as a Design Context for Unobtrusive Interaction. In NatureCHI 2016. San Jose. http://www.naturechi.net/2016/p43-Hakkila.pdf
[4]
Jonna Häkkilä, Ashley Colley, and Matilda Kalving. 2019. Designing an interactive gravestone display. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays - PerDis '19. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1--7.
[5]
Geraint Jones, Yvonne Rogers, and Nicolai Marquardt. 2016. Presence and Use: Sensors In Community Gardening. In NatureChI 2016 - Unobtrusive User Experiences with Technology in Nature. UCLIC - UCL Interaction Centre, San Jose, 29--32. https://uclic.ucl.ac.uk/publications/1129763
[6]
Kramer and Kem-Laurin. 2012. User Experience in the Age of Sustainability. Elsevier, Inc., Waltham. 31--68 pages. https://learning.oreilly.com/library/view/user-experience-in/9780123877956/xhtml/Title.html
[7]
Ramón López-Cózar and Zoraida Callejas. 2010. Multimodal Dialogue for Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments. In Handbook of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments. Springer US, Boston, MA, 559--579.
[8]
Helena Nordh and Katinka H. Evensen. 2018. Qualities and functions ascribed to urban cemeteries across the capital cities of Scandinavia. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 33 (jun 2018), 80--91.
[9]
Helena Nordh and Grete Swensen. 2018. Introduction to the special feature "The role of cemeteries as green urban spaces". Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 33 (jun 2018), 56--57.
[10]
Søren Overgaard. 2015. How to do things with brackets: the epoché explained. Continental Philosophy Review 48, 2 (2015), 179--195.
[11]
Nikolaos Partarakis, Dimitris Grammenos, George Margetis, Emmanouil Zidianakis, Giannis Drossis, Asterios Leonidis, George Metaxakis, Margherita Antona, and Constantine Stephanidis. 2017. Digital Cultural Heritage Experience in Ambient Intelligence. In Mixed Reality and Gamification for Cultural Heritage. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 473--505.
[12]
Pat Pataranutaporn and Kimberly Lyle. 2018. Toward Human-Magic Interaction: Interfacing Biological, Tangible, and Cultural Technology. (2018).
[13]
Julie Rugg. 2000. Defining the place of burial: What makes a cemetery a cemetery? Mortality 5, 3 (nov 2000), 259--275.
[14]
Cameron Steer, Simon Robinson, and Matt Jones. 2016. Hands On With Nature: Designing Tangible Interactions With Plants. In NaturCHI 2016 Unobtrusive User Experiences with Technology in Nature. 16--20.
[15]
Alexander Wiethoff and Heinrich Hussmann. 2017. Media architecture : using information and media as construction material. De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston. 1--4 pages.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Unobtrusive interaction: a systematic literature review and expert surveyHuman–Computer Interaction10.1080/07370024.2022.216240439:5-6(380-416)Online publication date: Feb-2023
  • (2022)Design Recommendations for Historical Cemeteries Using Speculative DesignProceedings of the 25th International Academic Mindtrek Conference10.1145/3569219.3569378(147-157)Online publication date: 16-Nov-2022
  • (2021)Blend in or Pop Out? Designing an Embedded Interface for a Historical CemeteryHuman-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 202110.1007/978-3-030-85613-7_40(635-645)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
UbiComp/ISWC '19 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
September 2019
1234 pages
ISBN:9781450368698
DOI:10.1145/3341162
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 September 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. attention-aware
  2. natural public places
  3. unobtrusive
  4. work in progress

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

UbiComp '19

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 764 of 2,912 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Unobtrusive interaction: a systematic literature review and expert surveyHuman–Computer Interaction10.1080/07370024.2022.216240439:5-6(380-416)Online publication date: Feb-2023
  • (2022)Design Recommendations for Historical Cemeteries Using Speculative DesignProceedings of the 25th International Academic Mindtrek Conference10.1145/3569219.3569378(147-157)Online publication date: 16-Nov-2022
  • (2021)Blend in or Pop Out? Designing an Embedded Interface for a Historical CemeteryHuman-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 202110.1007/978-3-030-85613-7_40(635-645)Online publication date: 30-Aug-2021
  • (2020)Unobtrusive Interfaces for Historical and Culturally Sensitive PlacesCompanion Publication of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3393914.3395825(521-525)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media