skip to main content
10.1145/3341163.3347725acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Altered pinna: exploring shape change of pinna for perception and illusion of sound direction change

Published:09 September 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study demonstrates that by opening and closing the human pinna, we can change the direction of sound perceived by humans. Each ear was independently transformed into a 100% open, 50% open, and 100% closed state, and all 9 combinations of these ear transformations were tested to evaluate the perceived direction of the sound output from 7 speakers placed 180 degrees around the subject. We demonstrate that by deforming the pinna, we could change the perception of the direction of sound, or make it illusory. We also found that except for 1 out of 7 speakers (or directions of sound), closing 100% of the ear on the side of the speaker where the sound is coming from and 50% of the ear on the other side of the speaker tends produce the most alteration to the perceived direction of sound.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Dwight W Batteau. 1967. The role of the pinna in human localization. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 168, 1011 (1967), 158--180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Jens Blauert. 1997. Spatial hearing: the psychophysics of human sound localization. MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hong-Yu Chang, Wen-Jie Tseng, Chia-En Tsai, Hsin-Yu Chen, Roshan Lalintha Peiris, and Liwei Chan. 2018. FacePush: Introducing Normal Force on Face with Head-Mounted Displays. In The 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 927--935. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Da-Yuan Huang, Teddy Seyed, Linjun Li, Jun Gong, Zhihao Yao, Yuchen Jiao, Xiang'Anthony' Chen, and Xing-Dong Yang. 2018. Orecchio: Extending Body-Language through Actuated Static and Dynamic Auricular Postures. In The 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 697--710. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Naoto Kaneko. 2008. Detecting the direction of listening with the emg signals measured behind ears. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 535--538. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Takashi Kikuchi, Yuta Sugiura, Katsutoshi Masai, Maki Sugimoto, and Bruce H Thomas. 2017. EarTouch: turning the ear into an input surface. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, 27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Yuichiro Kojima, Yuki Hashimoto, Shogo Fukushima, and Hiroyuki Kajimoto. 2009. Pull-navi: a novel tactile navigation interface by pulling the ears. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2009 Emerging Technologies. ACM, 19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Juyoung Lee, Hui-Shyong Yeo, Murtaza Dhuliawala, Jedidiah Akano, Junichi Shimizu, Thad Starner, Aaron Quigley, Woontack Woo, and Kai Kunze. 2017. Itchy Nose: Discreet Gesture Interaction Using EOG Sensors in Smart Eyewear. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 94--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Roman Lissermann, Jochen Huber, Aristotelis Hadjakos, Suranga Nanayakkara, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2014. EarPut: augmenting ear-worn devices for ear-based interaction. In Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: the Future of Design. ACM, 300--307. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Roshan Lalintha Peiris, Liwei Chan, and Kouta Minamizawa. 2018. LiquidReality: wetness sensations on the face for virtual reality. In International Conference on Human Haptic Sensing and Touch Enabled Computer Applications. Springer, Cham, 366--378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Roshan Lalintha Peiris, Wei Peng, Zikun Chen, and Kouta Minamizawa. 2017. Exploration of cuing methods for localization of spatial cues using thermal haptic feedback on the forehead. In 2017 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC). IEEE, 400--405.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Luis C Populin and Tom CT Yin. 1998. Pinna movements of the cat during sound localization. Journal of Neuroscience 18, 11 (1998), 4233--4243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Tomoko Shimoda, Toru Nakashima, Makoto Kumon, Ryuichi Kohzawa, Ikuro Mizumoto, and Zenta Iwai. 2006. Spectral cues for robust sound localization with pinnae. In 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 386--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Yutaka Takase and Shoichi Hasegawa. 2012. Presentation of directional information by sound field control. In Proceedings of the 3rd Augmented Human International Conference. ACM, 32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. YASUO TAKEO. 1964. Correlation between interaural time and intensity difference in the sound lateralization. Nippon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 67, 2 (1964), 106--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Altered pinna: exploring shape change of pinna for perception and illusion of sound direction change

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ISWC '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
      September 2019
      355 pages
      ISBN:9781450368704
      DOI:10.1145/3341163

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 September 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate38of196submissions,19%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader