skip to main content
10.1145/3342428.3342685acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgoodtechsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Paradox in ML Design: Less data for a smarter water metering cognification experience

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 September 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many data scientists are currently pointing out that the amount of Machine Learning (ML) research that will cross into practice will depend, not just on the ability of the specialized algorithms used to scrutinize positive/negative examples, but also on the quality of the data exploited for training those algorithms. Our experience, while training a neural network with a huge dataset comprised of over fifteen million water meter readings, confirms such conjecture. In this paper, we report on the actions we took to extrapolate from that database just those data that could correctly represent the complex statistical phenomenon in play. With an adequate re-organization of those data, we got an interesting, yet controversial, result. On the one hand, we improved the accuracy on the prediction when a water meter fails/needs disassembly based on a history of water consumption measurements, thus making smarter a meter maintenance process; on the other hand, all this came with the paradox of a (statistical) transformation of the initial dataset: while we alleviate a problem with a restructured and better interpretable data model, we simultaneously change the replicated form of those data.

References

  1. Pettersen, L. (2018) Why Artificial Intelligence will not outsmart complex knowledge work. Work, Employment and Society. Sage. To appear.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jordan, M. I., Mitchell, T. M. (2015). Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science, 349(6245), 255--260.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Delnevo, G., Roccetti, M., Mirri, S. (2019). Intelligent and good machines? The role of domain and context codification, Mobile Networks and Applications, Elsevier. To appear.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Witten, I. H., Frank, E., Hall, M. A., Pal, C. J. (2016). Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Alkowaileet, W., Alsubaiee, S., Carey, M., Li, C., Ramampiaro, H., Sinthong, P., Wang, X. (2018). Enhancing Big Data with semantics: The AsterixDB approach. In Proc. of 12th IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing, 314--315. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Emani, C. K., Cullot, N., Nicolle, C. (2015). Understandable big data: a survey. Computer Science Review, 17, 70--81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Casini, L., Delnevo, G., Roccetti, M., Zagni, N., Cappiello, G. (2019). Deep Water: Predicting water meter failures through a human-machine intelligence collaboration. In Proc. of 1st International Conference on Human Interaction & Emerging Technologies. Springer. To appearGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bird, S., Kenthapadi, K., Kiciman, E., Mitchell, M. (2019). Fairness-Aware Machine Learning: Practical challenges and lessons learned. In Proc. of 12th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 834--835. ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Friedler, S. A., Scheidegger, C., Venkatasubramanian, S., Choudhary, S., Hamilton, E. P., Roth, D. (2019). A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learning. In Proc. of Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency Conference, 329--338, ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Rosner, D., Roccetti, M., Marfia, G., (2014). The digitization of cultural practices. Communications of the ACM 57(6), 82--87, ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Casini, L., Marfia, G., Roccetti, M., (2018). Some reflections on the potential and limitations of deep learning for automated music generation. In Proc. of International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, IEEEGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Paradox in ML Design: Less data for a smarter water metering cognification experience

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        GoodTechs '19: Proceedings of the 5th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good
        September 2019
        272 pages
        ISBN:9781450362610
        DOI:10.1145/3342428

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 September 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader