skip to main content
10.1145/3342558.3345413acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocengConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Writer Characterization and Identification of Short Modern and Historical Documents: Reconsidering Paleographic Tables

Published: 23 September 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Handwriting is considered a unique "fingerprint" that characterizes a scribe (it is even used as evidence in modern forensics). In paleography (the study of ancient writing), it is presumed that each writer has a one prototype for each letter in the alphabet. Commonly, for ancient inscriptions, letters are organized into paleographic tables (where the rows are the alphabet letters, and the columns represent the examined inscriptions). These tables play a significant role in dating inscriptions based on their resemblance to columns in the table. In this paper, we argue that each scribe "fingerprint" is not represented by a single character prototype, but in fact by a distribution of characters. We introduce a framework for automatically identifying the writer style and constructing paleographic tables based on character histograms. Subsequently, we propose a method for comparing short documents utilizing letter distribution. We demonstrate the validity of the methods on two handwritten datasets: Modern and Ancient Hebrew pertaining to the First Temple period. Our methodology on the ancient dataset enables us to provide additional evidence concerning the level of literacy in the kingdom of Judah ca. 600 BCE.

Supplementary Material

faigenbaum-golovin (faigenbaum-golovin.zip)
Supplemental movie, appendix, image and software files for, Writer Characterization and Identification of Short Modern and Historical Documents: Reconsidering Paleographic Tables

References

[1]
U. Sharma, and V. Rana. 2017. Handwriting Comparison in Court Trials: a Need for Forensic Upgradation. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 8.
[2]
L. Wolf, N. Dershowitz, L. Potikha, T. German, R. Shweka, and Y. Choueka. 2011. Automatic Palaeographic Exploration of Genizah Manuscripts, 3, Books on Demand.
[3]
G. Levi, P. Nisnevich, A. Ben-Shalom, N. Dershowitz and L. Wolf. 2018. A Method for Segmentation, Matching and Alignment of Dead Sea Scrolls. In 2018 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV).
[4]
S. Faigenbaum-Golovin, A. Shaus, B. Sober, D. Levin, N. Na'aman, B. Sass, E. Turkel, E. Piasetzky, and I. Finkelstein. 2016. Algorithmic handwriting analysis of Judah's military correspondence sheds light on composition of biblical texts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 4664--4669.
[5]
A. Shaus, and E. Turkel. 2017. Writer Identification in Modern and Historical Documents via Binary Pixel Patterns, Kolmogorov--Smirnov Test and Fisher's Method. Electronic Imaging, 2017, 203--211.
[6]
P. Dondi, A. Danani, L. Lombardi, M. Malagodi, and M. Licchelli. 2018. Handwriting identification of short historical manuscripts. In 2018 13th IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems (DAS).
[7]
A. Abdalhaleem, B. K. Barakat, and J. El-Sana. 2018. Case Study: Fine Writing Style Classification Using Siamese Neural Network. In 2018 IEEE 2nd International Workshop on Arabic and Derived Script Analysis and Recognition (ASAR).
[8]
A. A. Brink, J. Smit, M. L. Bulacu, and L. R. B. Schomaker. 2012. Writer identification using directional ink-trace width measurements. Pattern Recognition, 45, 162--171.
[9]
S. He, and L. Schomaker. 2017. Writer identification using curvature-free features. Pattern Recognition, vol. 63, pp. 451--464.
[10]
Y. Aharoni, and J. Naveh. 1981. Arad inscriptions, Israel exploration society.
[11]
A. Shaus, and E. Turkel. 2017. Towards letter shape prior and paleographic tables estimation in Hebrew First Temple period ostraca. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Historical Document Imaging and Processing.
[12]
T. F. Cox, and M. A. A. Cox. 2000. Multidimensional scaling, Chapman and hall/CRC.
[13]
R. A. Fisher. 1925. Statistical methods for research workers Oliver and Boyd. Edinburgh, Scotland, 6.
[14]
Modern Hebrew Dataset. (Online): www-nuclear.tau.ac.il/eip/ostraca/DataSets/Modern_Hebrew.zip. Last accessed: 27/5/2019.
[15]
Supplemental Material. (Online): https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/b9b8a4_cd710d52d3a942d49f0c108b5d126e32.pdf. Last accessed: 27/5/2019.
[16]
S. Faigenbaum, A. Shaus, B. Sober, E. Turkel, and E. Piasetzky, "Evaluating glyph binarizations based on their properties," in Proceedings of the 2013 ACM symposium on Document engineering, 2013.
[17]
B. Sober, and D. Levin. 2017. Computer aided restoration of handwritten character strokes. Computer-Aided Design, 89, 12--24.
[18]
Ancient Hebrew Dataset. (Online): www-nuclear.tau.ac.il/eip/ostraca/DataSets/Arad_Ancient_Hebrew.zip. Last accessed:27/5/2019.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Computational Handwriting Analysis of Ancient Hebrew Inscriptions – A SurveyIEEE BITS the Information Theory Magazine10.1109/MBITS.2022.3197559(1-15)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2021)Literacy in Judah and IsraelNear Eastern Archaeology10.1086/71407084:2(148-158)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2021
  • (2020)Algorithmic handwriting analysis of the Samaria inscriptions illuminates bureaucratic apparatus in biblical IsraelPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.022745215:1(e0227452)Online publication date: 22-Jan-2020

Index Terms

  1. Writer Characterization and Identification of Short Modern and Historical Documents: Reconsidering Paleographic Tables

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DocEng '19: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering 2019
      September 2019
      254 pages
      ISBN:9781450368872
      DOI:10.1145/3342558
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      In-Cooperation

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 23 September 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Handwriting comparison
      2. Hebrew ostraca
      3. Iron Age
      4. Judah
      5. epigraphy
      6. historical documents
      7. paleographic tables

      Qualifiers

      • Short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      DocEng '19
      Sponsor:
      DocEng '19: ACM Symposium on Document Engineering 2019
      September 23 - 26, 2019
      Berlin, Germany

      Acceptance Rates

      DocEng '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 30 of 77 submissions, 39%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 194 of 564 submissions, 34%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2022)Computational Handwriting Analysis of Ancient Hebrew Inscriptions – A SurveyIEEE BITS the Information Theory Magazine10.1109/MBITS.2022.3197559(1-15)Online publication date: 2022
      • (2021)Literacy in Judah and IsraelNear Eastern Archaeology10.1086/71407084:2(148-158)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2021
      • (2020)Algorithmic handwriting analysis of the Samaria inscriptions illuminates bureaucratic apparatus in biblical IsraelPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.022745215:1(e0227452)Online publication date: 22-Jan-2020

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media