skip to main content
10.1145/3343031.3356063acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Continuous Bitrate & Latency Control with Deep Reinforcement Learning for Live Video Streaming

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we introduce a continuous bitrate control and latency control model for the Live Video Streaming Challenge. Our model is based on Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient, popular on continuous control tasks. Simultaneously, it can take a fine-grained control through continuous control and does not need to discrete the continuous "latency limit", which is a buffer threshold to minimize end-to-end delay by frame skipping. In all considered live video scenarios, our model can provide a better quality of experience with improvements in average QoE of 3.6% than DQN which discrete the "latency limit". Additionally, challenge results show the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed model, which achieved top performance in 3 different networks that include high, low and oscillating throughput, and ranked the second place in the network with medium throughput.

References

  1. Zahaib Akhtar, Yun Seong Nam, Ramesh Govindan, Sanjay Rao, Jessica Chen, Ethan Katz-Bassett, Bruno Ribeiro, Jibin Zhan, and Hui Zhang. 2018. Oboe: auto-tuning video ABR algorithms to network conditions. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication. ACM, 44--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Abdelhak Bentaleb, Bayan Taani, Ali C Begen, Christian Timmerer, and Roger Zimmermann. 2018. A survey on bitrate adaptation schemes for streaming media over http. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, Vol. 21, 1 (2018), 562--585.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. VNI Cisco. 2018. Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Trends, 2017--2022. White Paper (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Matteo Gadaleta, Federico Chiariotti, Michele Rossi, and Andrea Zanella. 2017. D-DASH: A deep Q-learning framework for DASH video streaming. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, Vol. 3, 4 (2017), 703--718.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Tianchi Huang, Rui-Xiao Zhang, Zhou Chao, and Lifeng Sun. 2018. QARC: Video Quality Aware Rate Control for Real-Time Video Streaming based on Deep Reinforcement Learning. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Te Yuan Huang, Ramesh Johari, Nick Mckeown, Matthew Trunnell, and Mark Watson. 2014. A Buffer-Based Approach to Rate Adaptation: Evidence from a Large Video Streaming Service. Acm Sigcomm Computer Communication Review, Vol. 44, 4 (2014), 187--198.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Junchen Jiang, Vyas Sekar, and Hui Zhang. 2014. Improving fairness, efficiency, and stability in http-based adaptive video streaming with festive. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (ToN), Vol. 22, 1 (2014), 326--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980(2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Yuxi Li. 2017. Deep reinforcement learning: An overview. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.07274 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Timothy P Lillicrap, Jonathan J Hunt, Alexander Pritzel, Nicolas Heess, Tom Erez, Yuval Tassa, David Silver, and Daan Wierstra. 2015. Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.02971 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hongzi Mao, Ravi Netravali, and Mohammad Alizadeh. 2017. Neural adaptive video streaming with pensieve. In Proceedings of the Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication. ACM, 197--210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Volodymyr Mnih, Adria Puigdomenech Badia, Mehdi Mirza, Alex Graves, Timothy Lillicrap, Tim Harley, David Silver, and Koray Kavukcuoglu. 2016. Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning. In International conference on machine learning. 1928--1937.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Volodymyr Mnih, Koray Kavukcuoglu, David Silver, Andrei A Rusu, Joel Veness, Marc G Bellemare, Alex Graves, Martin Riedmiller, Andreas K Fidjeland, Georg Ostrovski, et almbox. 2015. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, Vol. 518, 7540 (2015), 529.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kevin Spiteri, Rahul Urgaonkar, and Ramesh K Sitaraman. 2016. BOLA: Near-optimal bitrate adaptation for online videos. In IEEE INFOCOM 2016-The 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Yi Sun, Xiaoqi Yin, Junchen Jiang, Vyas Sekar, Fuyuan Lin, Nanshu Wang, Tao Liu, and Bruno Sinopoli. 2016. CS2P: Improving video bitrate selection and adaptation with data-driven throughput prediction. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGCOMM Conference. ACM, 272--285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Pawel Wawrzynski. 2015. Control policy with autocorrelated noise in reinforcement learning for robotics. International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing, Vol. 5, 2 (2015), 91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Xiaoqi Yin, Abhishek Jindal, Vyas Sekar, and Bruno Sinopoli. 2015. A control-theoretic approach for dynamic adaptive video streaming over HTTP. In ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol. 45. ACM, 325--338.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Continuous Bitrate & Latency Control with Deep Reinforcement Learning for Live Video Streaming

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          MM '19: Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia
          October 2019
          2794 pages
          ISBN:9781450368896
          DOI:10.1145/3343031

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 15 October 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          MM '19 Paper Acceptance Rate252of936submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate995of4,171submissions,24%

          Upcoming Conference

          MM '24
          MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
          October 28 - November 1, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader