Rachel A. Albert
ABSTRACT
Gaze-contingent rendering and display could help meet the increasing resolution and frame rate demands of modern displays while reducing the required latency, bandwidth, and power. However, it is still unclear how degradation of the peripheral image impacts behavior, particularly for the important task of reading. We examined changes in reading speed with different levels of peripheral degradation, varying the size of the text, foveal region, and sub-sampling kernel. We found a wide spread of responses across subjects, with the average change in reading speed ranging from -123 words per minute (WPM) to +67 WPM. We did not find significant effects across types of peripheral degradation, but the change in reading speed was significantly inversely correlated with baseline reading speed (r=-0.513, n=17, p=0.0352), indicating that faster readers were more negatively impacted.
- 2018. NVIDIA Turing GPU Architecture. Technical Report. NVIDIA Corporation.Google Scholar
- Rachel Albert, Anjul Patney, David Luebke, and Joohwan Kim. 2017. Latency requirements for foveated rendering in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 14, 4 (2017), 25. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D Baldwin. 1981. Area of interest: Instantaneous field of view vision model. In lmage Generation/Display Conference. lmage Generation/Display Conference.Google Scholar
- Susana TL Chung. 2002. The effect of letter spacing on reading speed in central and peripheral vision. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 43, 4 (2002), 1270–1276.Google Scholar
- Susana TL Chung, J Stephen Mansfield, and Gordon E Legge. 1998. Psychophysics of reading. XVIII. The effect of print size on reading speed in normal peripheral vision. Vision research 38, 19 (1998), 2949–2962.Google Scholar
- Andrew T. Duchowski and Arzu Çöltekin. 2007. Foveated gaze-contingent displays for peripheral LOD management, 3D visualization, and stereo imaging. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM) 3, 4 (2007), 6. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1314309 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andrew T. Duchowski, Nathan Cournia, and Hunter Murphy. 2004. Gaze-contingent displays: A review. CyberPsychology & Behavior 7, 6 (2004), 621–634.Google ScholarCross Ref
- SE Feldon, RM Burde, and AE Walonker. 1987. The extraocular muscles. , 88–121 pages.Google Scholar
- Thomas A Funkhouser and Carlo H Séquin. 1993. Adaptive display algorithm for interactive frame rates during visualization of complex virtual environments. In Siggraph, Vol. 93. 247–254. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guy Godin, Philippe Massicotte, and Louis Borgeat. 2006. High-resolution insets in projector-based stereoscopic displays: principles and techniques. In Electronic Imaging 2006. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 60550F–60550F.Google Scholar
- Brian Guenter, Mark Finch, Steven Drucker, Desney Tan, and John Snyder. 2012. Foveated 3D Graphics. ACM Trans. Graph. 31, 6 (Nov. 2012), 164:1–164:10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eric M Howlett. 1992. High-resolution inserts in wide-angle head-mounted stereoscopic displays. In Stereoscopic Displays and Applications III, Vol. 1669. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 193–204.Google Scholar
- Albrecht Werner Inhoff, Alexander Pollatsek, Michael I Posner, and Keith Rayner. 1989. Covert attention and eye movements during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 41, 1(1989), 63–89.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Josh Kaufman. {n. d.}. Google-10000-English. https://github.com/first20hours/google-10000-english. Accessed: 2019-05-03.Google Scholar
- Joohwan Kim, Qi Sun, Fu-Chung Huang, Li-Yi Wei, David Luebke, and Arie Kaufman. 2017. Perceptual studies for foveated light field displays. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.06034(2017).Google Scholar
- J Peter Kincaid, Robert P Fishburne Jr, Richard L Rogers, and Brad S Chissom. 1975. Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. (1975).Google Scholar
- S. Lee, J. Cho, B. Lee, Y. Jo, C. Jang, D. Kim, and B. Lee. 2017. Foveated Retinal Optimization for See-through Near-Eye Multi-Layer Displays (Invited Paper). IEEE Access PP, 99 (2017), 1–1.Google Scholar
- Gordon E Legge, Sing-Hang Cheung, Deyue Yu, Susana TL Chung, Hye-Won Lee, and Daniel P Owens. 2007. The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading. Journal of Vision 7, 2 (2007), 9–9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gordon E Legge, David H Parish, Andrew Luebker, and Lee H Wurm. 1990. Psychophysics of reading. XI. Comparing color contrast and luminance contrast. JOSA A 7, 10 (1990), 2002–2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gordon E Legge, Denis G Pelli, Gar S Rubin, and Mary M Schleske. 1985. Psychophysics of reading - I. Normal vision. Vision research 25, 2 (1985), 239–252.Google Scholar
- Gordon E Legge, Gary S Rubin, and Andrew Luebker. 1987. Psychophysics of reading. The role of contrast in normal vision. Vision research 27, 7 (1987), 1165–1177.Google Scholar
- Marc Levoy and Ross Whitaker. 1990. Gaze-directed volume rendering. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics 24, 2 (1990), 217–223. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=91449 Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Luebke and Benjamin Hallen. 2001. Perceptually driven simplification for interactive rendering. In Rendering Techniques 2001. Springer, 223–234. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-7091-6242-2_21 Google ScholarDigital Library
- George W McConkie and Keith Rayner. 1975. The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics 17, 6 (1975), 578–586.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Morgan McGuire, Michael Mara, and Zander Majercik. 2017. The G3D Innovation Engine. https://casual-effects.com/g3dhttps://casual-effects.com/g3d.Google Scholar
- Hunter A. Murphy, Andrew T. Duchowski, and Richard A. Tyrrell. 2009. Hybrid image/model-based gaze-contingent rendering. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 5, 4 (2009), 22. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1462053 Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. L. Nicora, T. Drew, D. Stokes, and J. K. Stefanucci. 2018. Do you see what I see?: Exploring holistic processing with gaze-contingent viewing.. In Poster presented at the 59th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
- NVIDIA. 2016a. VRWorks - Lens Matched Shading. https://developer.nvidia.com/vrworks/graphics/lensmatchedshadingGoogle Scholar
- NVIDIA. 2016b. VRWorks - Multi-Res Shading. https://developer.nvidia.com/vrworks/graphics/multiresshadingGoogle Scholar
- Toshikazu Ohshima, Hiroyuki Yamamoto, and Hideyuki Tamura. 1996. Gaze-directed adaptive rendering for interacting with virtual space. In Virtual reality annual international symposium, 1996., Proceedings of the IEEE 1996. IEEE, 103–110. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/490517/ Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anjul Patney, Marco Salvi, Joohwan Kim, Anton Kaplanyan, Chris Wyman, Nir Benty, David Luebke, and Aaron Lefohn. 2016. Towards Foveated Rendering for Gaze-tracked Virtual Reality. ACM Trans. Graph. 35, 6 (Nov. 2016), 179:1–179:12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Denis G Pelli, Katharine A Tillman, Jeremy Freeman, Michael Su, Tracey D Berger, and Najib J Majaj. 2007. Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. Journal of vision 7, 2 (2007), 20–20.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Keith Rayner. 1986. Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. Journal of experimental child psychology 41, 2 (1986), 211–236.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Keith Rayner. 1998. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.Psychological bulletin 124, 3 (1998), 372.Google Scholar
- Keith Rayner. 2009. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The quarterly journal of experimental psychology 62, 8(2009), 1457–1506.Google Scholar
- Keith Rayner, Alexander Pollatsek, Jane Ashby, and Charles Clifton Jr. 2012. Psychology of reading. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Stephen M Reder. 1973. On-line monitoring of eye-position signals in contingent and noncontingent paradigms. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation 5, 2(1973), 218–228.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eyal M. Reingold, Lester C. Loschky, George W. McConkie, and David M. Stampe. 2003. Gaze-contingent multiresolutional displays: An integrative review. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45, 2(2003), 307–328. http://hfs.sagepub.com/content/45/2/307.shortGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Jannick P Rolland, Akitoshi Yoshida, Larry D Davis, and John H Reif. 1998. High-resolution inset head-mounted display. Applied optics 37, 19 (1998), 4183–4193.Google Scholar
- Gary S Rubin and Kathleen Turano. 1992. Reading without saccadic eye movements. Vision research 32, 5 (1992), 895–902.Google Scholar
- Martin Shenker. 1987. Optical design criteria for binocular helmet-mounted displays. In Display System Optics, Vol. 778. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 70–79.Google Scholar
- Harold A Solan. 1985. Deficient eye-movement patterns in achieving high school students: Three case histories. Journal of Learning Disabilities 18, 2 (1985), 66–70.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Josef Spjut, Ben Boudaoud, Jonghyun Kim, Trey Greer, Rachel Albert, Michael Stengel, Kaan Aksit, and David Luebke. 2019. Toward Standardized Classification of Foveated Displays. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.06229(2019).Google Scholar
- A Michael Spooner. 1982. The trend towards area of interest in visual simulation technology. Technical Report. NAVAL TRAINING EQUIPMENT CENTER ORLANDO FL.Google Scholar
- Michael Stengel, Steve Grogorick, Martin Eisemann, and Marcus Magnor. 2016. Adaptive Image-Space Sampling for Gaze-Contingent Real-time Rendering. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 35. Wiley Online Library, 129–139.Google Scholar
- N Roderic Underwood and George W McConkie. 1985. Perceptual span for letter distinctions during reading. Reading Research Quarterly(1985), 153–162.Google Scholar
- Karthik Vaidyanathan, Marco Salvi, Robert Toth, Tim Foley, Tomas Akenine-Möller, Jim Nilsson, Jacob Munkberg, Jon Hasselgren, Masamichi Sugihara, Petrik Clarberg, 2014. Coarse pixel shading. In Proceedings of High Performance Graphics. Eurographics Association, 9–18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carlin Vieri, Grace Lee, Nikhil Balram, Sang Hoon Jung, Joon Young Yang, Soo Young Yoon, and In Byeong Kang. 2018. An 18 megapixel 4.3 ”1443 ppi 120 Hz OLED display for wide field of view high acuity head mounted displays. Journal of the Society for Information Display 26, 5 (2018), 314–324.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hector Yee, Sumanita Pattanaik, and Donald P Greenberg. 2001. Spatiotemporal sensitivity and visual attention for efficient rendering of dynamic environments. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 20, 1 (2001), 39–65. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Deyue Yu, Sing-Hang Cheung, Gordon E Legge, and Susana TL Chung. 2007. Effect of letter spacing on visual span and reading speed. Journal of vision 7, 2 (2007), 2–2.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hongbin Zha, Yoshinobu Makimoto, and Tsutomu Hasegawa. 1999. Dynamic gaze-controlled levels of detail of polygonal objects in 3-D environment modeling. In 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, 1999. Proceedings. Second International Conference on. IEEE, 321–330. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xin Zhang, Wei Chen, Zhonglei Yang, Chuan Zhu, and Qunsheng Peng. 2011. A new foveation ray casting approach for real-time rendering of 3D scenes. In Computer-Aided Design and Computer Graphics (CAD/Graphics), 2011 12th International Conference on. IEEE, 99–102. Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
Skim reading: an adaptive strategy for reading on the web
WebSci '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on Web scienceIt has been suggested that readers spend a great deal of time skim reading on the Web and that if readers skim read they reduce their comprehension of what they have read. There have been a number of studies exploring skim reading, but relatively little ...
Towards a gaze-contingent reading assistance for children with difficulties in reading
ASSETS '20: Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and AccessibilityReading is a key skill in learning, working and participating in society on all levels. However, in 2018, 20% of German school students possessed only insufficient levels of reading proficiency. Frustration associated with these difficulties results in ...
Reading Experiences and Reading Efficiency Among Adults with Dyslexia: An Accessibility Study
Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Access to Media, Learning and Assistive EnvironmentsAbstractDyslexia is a common reading disorder that typically affects reading, concentration and short-term memory. Consequently, for people with dyslexia, reading fictional books might be challenging. Several studies have addressed layout and typography ...
Comments