skip to main content
10.1145/3345252.3345257acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescompsystechConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A bilingual ontology mapping and enrichment approach for domain ontologies in e-learning

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

English language is accepted as international language for publishing research in e-learning and Semantic Web area, but people are needed from representing data and knowledge in his native language. This paper proposes an approach for mapping and enrichment of domain ontologies, labeled in two natural languages (bilingual ontologies). Our main goal is to examine how ontology entity labels or comments in two or more natural languages can be used to improve ontology mapping. The proposed approach combines string-based, linguistic, structural and semantic mapping. It also can reuse existing mappings and use learner's or expert's feedback to improve mapping. We discuss the application of our approach for mapping ontologies describing e-learning content.

References

  1. Aguirre, J. L., Grau, B. C., Eckert, K., Euzenat, J., Ferrara, A., Van Hague, R. W., ... & Ritze, D. (2012). Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2012. In Proc. 7th ISWC workshop on ontology matching (OM) (pp. 73-115). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Al-Feel, H. et al. (2013). An inter-lingual reference approach for multi-lingual ontology matching. arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.6650, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold, P. and Rahm, E. (2014). Extracting Semantic Concept Relations from Wikipedia. in proc. 4th Int. Conf. Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics (WIMS), 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Arnold, P. and Rahm, E. (2014). Enriching ontology mappings with semantic relations. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 93, 1, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Arnold, P. and Rahm, E. (2015). SemRep: A repository for semantic mapping. Datenbanksysteme für Business, Technologie und Web, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bella, G., et al. (2017). Language and domain aware lightweight ontology matching. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 43, pp. 1-17, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Do, H. H. and. Rahm, (2002). E. Coma - a system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches. In Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB),. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dos, S. et al. (2010). An API for multilingual ontology matching. In Proc. 7th conference on Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), pp. 3830-3835, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Dragoni, M. and Petrucci, G. (2015). Supporting Multilingual Ontology Matching With MoKi. In International Semantic Web Conference (Posters & Demos), 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Euzenat, J., & Shvaiko, P. (2007). Ontology matching (Vol. 18). Heidelberg: Springer Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Fu, B. et al. (2009). Cross-lingual ontology mapping - an investigation of the impact of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual Asian Semantic Web Conference (ASWC 2009), Vol. 5926 of LNCS, pp. 1-15, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Giunchiglia F., Shvaiko, P. and Yatskevich, M.(2004). S-match: An algorithm and an implementation of semantic matching. In First European Semantic Web Symposium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hamp, B., & Feldweg, H. (1997). Germanet-a lexical-semantic net for german. Automatic information extraction and building of lexical semantic resources for NLP applications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jung, J. J. et al. (2009). Indirect alignment between multilingual ontologies: A case study of Korean and Swedish ontologies. Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 233-241, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Li, J. et al. (2009). RiMOM: A dynamic multistrategy ontology alignment framework. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 8, pp. 1218-1232, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lourdusamy, R. and Florrence J. M. (). Methods, approaches, principles, guidelines and applications on multilingual ontologies: a survey" ICTACT Journal on Soft Computing, 7(1), 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Madhavan, P. B. J. and Rahm, E. (2001). Generic schema matching with cupid. In Proceedings of the Very Large Data Bases Conference (VLDB), page 49,. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Meilicke, C. et al. (2012). MultiFarm: A benchmark for multilingual ontology matching. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, vol. 15, pp. 62-68, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Ngai, G. et al. (2002). Identifying concepts across languages: a first step towards a corpus-based approach to automatic ontology alignment. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, vol.1, pp. 1-7, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ngo, D., Bellahsene, Z., & Coletta, R. (2012). Yam++-a combination of graph matching and machine learning approach to ontology alignment task. Journal of Web Semantics, 16, 16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Otero-Cerdeira, L. et al. (2015). Ontology matching: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(2), pp. 949--971., 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Pazienta, M. and Stellato A.(2005). Linguistically motivated ontology mapping for the Semantic Web. In Proceedings of the 2nd Italian Semantic Web Workshop, pp. 14--16, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ramar, K. and Gurunathan, G. (2016). Technical review on ontology mapping techniques. Asian Journal of Information Technology, 15(4), pp. 676-688, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Schwarzer-Petruck, M., Johnson, C. R., & Scheffczyk, J. (2006). FrameNet II: Extended theory and practiceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Shvaiko, P. et al. (2017). OM-2017: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Workshop on Ontology Matching. In OM 2017-12th International Workshop on Ontology Matching, pp. 1-233, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Spohr, D. et al. (2011). A machine learning approach to multilingual and cross-lingual ontology matching. The Semantic Web--ISWC, pp. 665-680, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Spohr, D. et al. (2011). Multilingual and cross-lingual ontology matching and its application to financial accounting standards. in: Proceedings of the 10th International Semantic Web Conference, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Tang, J., Liang, B. Y. and Li, J. Z. (2005). Toward detecting mapping strategies for ontology interoperability. In The 14th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2005),Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhu, Y. L., Min, J., Zhou, Y. Q., Huang, X. J., & Wu, L. D. (2006). Semantic orientation computing based on HowNet. Journal of Chinese information processing, 20(1), 14--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Yeh, J. F. et al. (2004). Automated alignment and extraction of bilingual ontology for cross-language domain-specific applications. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Computational Linguistics,2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A bilingual ontology mapping and enrichment approach for domain ontologies in e-learning

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          CompSysTech '19: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies
          June 2019
          365 pages
          ISBN:9781450371490
          DOI:10.1145/3345252

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 21 June 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate241of492submissions,49%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader