skip to main content
10.1145/3345252.3345268acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescompsystechConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Wavelet Based Interval Varying Algorithm for Optimal Non-Stationary Signal Denoising

Published:21 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper reviews wavelet-based denoising techniques and presents an effective new algorithm using adaptive threshold method, processing of detailed and approximate coefficient, the optimal choice of level of decomposition for noise reduction in non-stationary signals. The method is based on computing of orthogonal wavelet transform and level-dependent estimation of the threshold. The proposed algorithm is tested with different wavelet bases: Haar, Daubechies; Cubic B-splines; Symplet; Coinflet; biorthogonal wavelets and a comparative analysis is performed. The proposed algorithm was applied to the real signals and has the task of assessing the application of different wavelet bases, threshold techniques, decomposition levels, and times to execute the procedures for accurate and fast-track procedures to reduce interference. The proposed algorithm can be used for single channel real non-stationary signals. For the purpose of comparative analysis of different methods a software program was created by the author, with graphical user interface, that implements the basic denoising techniques, enables the setting of the decomposition level, the wavelet basis, the size of the test signal, and calculates the evaluation characteristics of the denoising process. The software application enables the testing of new denoising algorithms, allows the addition of other types of noise and the investigation of their effects on the signals and is realized in the MATLAB development environment. The proposed results demonstrate that the presented algorithm is suitable for denoising of non-stationary real signals.

References

  1. P.Agante and J.P.M.de S'a (1999). ECG Noise Filtering Using Wavelets with Soft-thresholding Methods. In Proc. Comp. in Cardiology'99, 535--542.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. S.Chang, B.Yu, M.Vetterli (2000). Spatially adaptive wavelet thresholding with context modeling for image denoising. IEEE Trans. ImageProcess., 9(9), 1522--1531. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S.A.Chouakri, F.Bereksi-Reguig, S.Ahmaïdi, O.Fokapu (2005). Wavelet Denoising of Electrocardiogram Signal Based on Corrupted Noise Estimation. IEEE Comp. in Card., 32, 1021--1024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D.Donoho (1995). Denoising by soft thresholding. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 41(3), 613--627. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. G.Georgieva-Tsaneva, K.Tcheshmedjiev (2013). Denoising of Electrocardiogram Data with Methods of WA, In: Local Proceed. of 14th Intern. Conf. on Computer Systems and Technologies-CompSysTech'13, University of Ruse, Bulgaria, 9--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. E.Gospodinova, M.Gospodinov, N.Dey, I.Domuschiev, A.Ashour, S.Balas, T. Olariu (2016). Specialized Software System for HRV Analysis: An Implementation of Nonlinear Graphical Methods. Soft Computing Applications, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 633, 367--374.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M.Gospodinov, E.Gospodinova (2007). Comparative analysis of Hurst techniques. CompSysTech '07 Proceed. of 2007 Intern. Conf. on Computer systems and technologies, Bulgaria, Article No63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. L.Garrote, L.Hong, Y.Dong, Z.Yan-sheng (2016). A new wavelet threshold function and denoising application. Mathematical Problems in Engineering.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. H.Madhu, B.Bhavani, S. Sumathi, and H.Vidya (2015). A novel algorithm for denoising of simulated partial discharge signals using adaptive wavelet thresholding methods, in Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Electron. Commun. Syst., 1596--1602.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S.Mallat, (2009). Denoising. In: A wavelet tour of signal processing: Sparse way, 535-606, Elsevier/Acad. Press, Amsterdam, Boston.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. M. Srivastava, C.Anderson, J.Freed (2016). A New Wavelet Denoising Method for Selecting Decomposition Levels and Noise Thresholds. IEEE Access, 4, 3861--3877.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M.Singh, R.Kumar, A.Kumar (2014). Comparison between different WT and thresholding techniques for ECG denoising. IEEE Intern. Conf. on Advances in Engin. Techn. Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Wavelet Based Interval Varying Algorithm for Optimal Non-Stationary Signal Denoising

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          CompSysTech '19: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies
          June 2019
          365 pages
          ISBN:9781450371490
          DOI:10.1145/3345252

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 21 June 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate241of492submissions,49%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader