skip to main content
10.1145/3345509.3349277acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Protocol to Build a Framework for Designing an Interactive Tool for Art Gallery Visitors

Published:12 September 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Involvement of hypermedia in art galleries and visitors engagement is truly an interdisciplinary research. We propose an initial study which will help in the building of a framework to design a satisfying interactive and engaging tools for visitors to art galleries. The paper suggests conducting semi-structured interviews with art curators as stakeholders. Thematic analysis should be done on the collected data which will help us to focus on the specific factors of greatest import to guide design of the tool set. The collected information and lessons from existing hypermedia models will continue to guide the designing of suitable tools.

References

  1. Susan Ali, Boriana Koleva, Ben Bedwell, and Steve Benford. 2018. Deepening Visitor Engagement with Museum Exhibits Through Hand-crafted Visual Markers. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 523--534. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Hamza Alshenqeeti. 2014. Interviewing as a Data Collection Method: A Critical Review. English Linguistics Research 3 (Jan. 2014), 39--45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Claus-Christian Carbon. 2017. Art Perception in the Museum: How We Spend Time and Space in Art Exhibitions. i-Perception 8, 1 (2017), 2041669517694184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jean Ho Chu, Daniel Harley, Jamie Kwan, Melanie McBride, and Ali Mazalek. 2016. Sensing History: Contextualizing Artifacts with Sensory Interactions and Narrative Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1294--1302. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Pierre-Antoine Cinquin, Pascal Guitton, and Hélène Sauzéon. 2019. Online elearning and cognitive disabilities: A systematic review. Computers & Education 130 (2019), 152--167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Daniel Conard. 2016. The Importance of the Artist's Intent. https:// contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=749Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. WA Eardley, Denise Ashe, and BD Fletcher. 2016. An Ontology Engineering Approach to User Profiling for Virtual Tours of Museums and Galleries. International Journal of Knowledge Engineering 2, 2 (2016), 85--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Ernest Edmonds. 2010. The Art of Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on The Interaction Design (Create'10). BCS Learning & Development Ltd., Swindon, UK, 5--10. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2227001. 2227003 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. David England, Thecla Schiphorst, and Nick Bryan-Kinns (Eds.). 2016. Curating the Digital Space for Art and Interaction (1 ed.). Springer, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. John H Falk. 2006. The impact of visit motivation on learning: Using identity as a construct to understand the visitor experience. Curator 49, 2 (2006), 151--166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Canada Council for the Arts. 2012. Public Engagement in the Arts. http://www.imaa.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Public-Engagement-inthe- Arts-English-final-digital.pdf Last accessed 17 June 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Julia Kathryn Hunt. 2013. Emerging Trends with Interactives in Art Museums. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Washington.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Pew Research Center Internet and Technology. 2012. The Rise of E-Reading. https://www.pewinternet.org/2012/04/04/the-rise-of-e-reading-5/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. A. Sears (Eds.) J. Jacko. 2009. Human-Computer Interaction: Development Process (1 ed.). CRC Press, Inc, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Awane Jones, Averie Hah, and Alan Shekhtman. 2017. Reconnecting With Arts Using Virtual And Augmented Reality. https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/ awanejones/reconnecting-with-arts-using-vr_b_10455180.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Aneka Kuzmiová, Theresa Schilhab, and Michael Burke. 0. m-Reading: Fiction reading from mobile phones. Convergence 0, 0 (0), 1354856518770987. https://doi. org/10.1177/1354856518770987Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Moira Maguire, Moira Maguire, and Brid Delahunt. 2017. Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 9, 3 (10 2017), 3351--33514. http://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Leonardo Meli, Claudio Pacchierotti, Gionata Salvietti, Francesco Chinello, Maurizio Maisto, Alessandro De Luca, and Domenico Prattichizzo. 2018. Combining Wearable Finger Haptics and Augmented Reality: User Evaluation Using an External Camera and the Microsoft HoloLens. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 3, 4 (10 2018), 4297--4304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. MW2015: Museums and theWeb 2015. 2015. Canadian Museum for Human Rights Mobile App. https://mw2015.museumsandtheweb.com/bow/canadian-museumfor- human-rights-mobile-app-2/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. MW17: Museums and the Web 2017. 2017. GLAMi Nomination: Lumin. https: //mw17.mwconf.org/glami/lumin/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Henri Neuendorf. 2016. Art Demystified: What Do Curators Actually Do? https: //news.artnet.com/art-world/art-demystifiedcurators-741806Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. CBC News. 2019. Uncomfortable in art galleries? Confed Centre aims to change that. Retrieved June 4, 2019 from https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prince-edwardisland/ pei-confederation-centre-program-1.4992913Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. The Cleveland Museum of Art. 2019. ArtLens Wall | Cleveland Museum of Art. http://www.clevelandart.org/artlens-gallery/artlens-walGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. The Museum of Modern Art. 2019. Accessibility. https://www.moma.org/visit/ accessibility/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Kyle Rector, Keith Salmon, Dan Thornton, Neel Joshi, and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2017. Eyes-Free Art: Exploring Proxemic Audio Interfaces For Blind and Low Vision Art Engagement. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 3 (2017), 93:1--93:21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Daniel Roßner and Claus Atzenbeck. 2018. Spatial Hypertext for End-User Development Tools. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Human Factors in Hypertext (HUMAN '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jessica Rubart. 2018. Multimodal Interaction with Hypermedia Structures. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Human Factors in Hypertext (HUMAN '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 17--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Frances Ryan, Michael Coughlan, and Patricia Cronin. 2009. Interviewing in qualitative research: The one-to-one interview. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 16, 6 (2009), 309--314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Payam Seyedmahmoud. 2018. The Museum Experience Learning and Engagement through the Emergence of New Interactive Technologies in Art Museums. Master's thesis. Trinity College Dublin. (In preparation).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Chi Thanh Vi, Damien Ablart, Elia Gatti, Carlos Velasco, and Marianna Obrist. 2017. Not just seeing, but also feeling art: Mid-air haptic experiences integrated in a multisensory art exhibition. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 108 (June 2017), 1--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Ezgl Ucar. 2015. Multisensory Met: Touch, Smell, and Hear Art. Retrieved June 4, 2019 from https://www.metmuseum.org/blogs/digital-underground/2015/ multisensory-metGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Natalia Vainstein, Tsvi Kuflik, and Joel Lanir. 2016. Towards Using Mobile, Head- Worn Displays in Cultural Heritage: User Requirements and a Research Agenda. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '16). ACM, NewYork, NY, USA, 327--331. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Protocol to Build a Framework for Designing an Interactive Tool for Art Gallery Visitors

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        HUMAN '19: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Human Factors in Hypertext
        September 2019
        39 pages
        ISBN:9781450368995
        DOI:10.1145/3345509

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 September 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        HUMAN '19 Paper Acceptance Rate3of4submissions,75%Overall Acceptance Rate6of9submissions,67%

        Upcoming Conference

        HT '24
        35th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
        September 10 - 13, 2024
        Poznan , Poland

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader