ABSTRACT
Involvement of hypermedia in art galleries and visitors engagement is truly an interdisciplinary research. We propose an initial study which will help in the building of a framework to design a satisfying interactive and engaging tools for visitors to art galleries. The paper suggests conducting semi-structured interviews with art curators as stakeholders. Thematic analysis should be done on the collected data which will help us to focus on the specific factors of greatest import to guide design of the tool set. The collected information and lessons from existing hypermedia models will continue to guide the designing of suitable tools.
- Susan Ali, Boriana Koleva, Ben Bedwell, and Steve Benford. 2018. Deepening Visitor Engagement with Museum Exhibits Through Hand-crafted Visual Markers. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 523--534. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hamza Alshenqeeti. 2014. Interviewing as a Data Collection Method: A Critical Review. English Linguistics Research 3 (Jan. 2014), 39--45.Google Scholar
- Claus-Christian Carbon. 2017. Art Perception in the Museum: How We Spend Time and Space in Art Exhibitions. i-Perception 8, 1 (2017), 2041669517694184.Google Scholar
- Jean Ho Chu, Daniel Harley, Jamie Kwan, Melanie McBride, and Ali Mazalek. 2016. Sensing History: Contextualizing Artifacts with Sensory Interactions and Narrative Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1294--1302. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pierre-Antoine Cinquin, Pascal Guitton, and Hélène Sauzéon. 2019. Online elearning and cognitive disabilities: A systematic review. Computers & Education 130 (2019), 152--167.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel Conard. 2016. The Importance of the Artist's Intent. https:// contempaesthetics.org/newvolume/pages/article.php?articleID=749Google Scholar
- WA Eardley, Denise Ashe, and BD Fletcher. 2016. An Ontology Engineering Approach to User Profiling for Virtual Tours of Museums and Galleries. International Journal of Knowledge Engineering 2, 2 (2016), 85--91.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ernest Edmonds. 2010. The Art of Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on The Interaction Design (Create'10). BCS Learning & Development Ltd., Swindon, UK, 5--10. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2227001. 2227003 Google ScholarDigital Library
- David England, Thecla Schiphorst, and Nick Bryan-Kinns (Eds.). 2016. Curating the Digital Space for Art and Interaction (1 ed.). Springer, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John H Falk. 2006. The impact of visit motivation on learning: Using identity as a construct to understand the visitor experience. Curator 49, 2 (2006), 151--166.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Canada Council for the Arts. 2012. Public Engagement in the Arts. http://www.imaa.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Public-Engagement-inthe- Arts-English-final-digital.pdf Last accessed 17 June 2019.Google Scholar
- Julia Kathryn Hunt. 2013. Emerging Trends with Interactives in Art Museums. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Washington.Google Scholar
- Pew Research Center Internet and Technology. 2012. The Rise of E-Reading. https://www.pewinternet.org/2012/04/04/the-rise-of-e-reading-5/Google Scholar
- A. Sears (Eds.) J. Jacko. 2009. Human-Computer Interaction: Development Process (1 ed.). CRC Press, Inc, USA.Google Scholar
- Awane Jones, Averie Hah, and Alan Shekhtman. 2017. Reconnecting With Arts Using Virtual And Augmented Reality. https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/ awanejones/reconnecting-with-arts-using-vr_b_10455180.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Aneka Kuzmiová, Theresa Schilhab, and Michael Burke. 0. m-Reading: Fiction reading from mobile phones. Convergence 0, 0 (0), 1354856518770987. https://doi. org/10.1177/1354856518770987Google Scholar
- Moira Maguire, Moira Maguire, and Brid Delahunt. 2017. Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. AISHE-J: The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 9, 3 (10 2017), 3351--33514. http://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335Google Scholar
- Leonardo Meli, Claudio Pacchierotti, Gionata Salvietti, Francesco Chinello, Maurizio Maisto, Alessandro De Luca, and Domenico Prattichizzo. 2018. Combining Wearable Finger Haptics and Augmented Reality: User Evaluation Using an External Camera and the Microsoft HoloLens. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 3, 4 (10 2018), 4297--4304.Google ScholarCross Ref
- MW2015: Museums and theWeb 2015. 2015. Canadian Museum for Human Rights Mobile App. https://mw2015.museumsandtheweb.com/bow/canadian-museumfor- human-rights-mobile-app-2/Google Scholar
- MW17: Museums and the Web 2017. 2017. GLAMi Nomination: Lumin. https: //mw17.mwconf.org/glami/lumin/Google Scholar
- Henri Neuendorf. 2016. Art Demystified: What Do Curators Actually Do? https: //news.artnet.com/art-world/art-demystifiedcurators-741806Google Scholar
- CBC News. 2019. Uncomfortable in art galleries? Confed Centre aims to change that. Retrieved June 4, 2019 from https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prince-edwardisland/ pei-confederation-centre-program-1.4992913Google Scholar
- The Cleveland Museum of Art. 2019. ArtLens Wall | Cleveland Museum of Art. http://www.clevelandart.org/artlens-gallery/artlens-walGoogle Scholar
- The Museum of Modern Art. 2019. Accessibility. https://www.moma.org/visit/ accessibility/Google Scholar
- Kyle Rector, Keith Salmon, Dan Thornton, Neel Joshi, and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2017. Eyes-Free Art: Exploring Proxemic Audio Interfaces For Blind and Low Vision Art Engagement. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 3 (2017), 93:1--93:21. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Roßner and Claus Atzenbeck. 2018. Spatial Hypertext for End-User Development Tools. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Human Factors in Hypertext (HUMAN '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9--15. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jessica Rubart. 2018. Multimodal Interaction with Hypermedia Structures. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Human Factors in Hypertext (HUMAN '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 17--21. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Frances Ryan, Michael Coughlan, and Patricia Cronin. 2009. Interviewing in qualitative research: The one-to-one interview. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 16, 6 (2009), 309--314.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Payam Seyedmahmoud. 2018. The Museum Experience Learning and Engagement through the Emergence of New Interactive Technologies in Art Museums. Master's thesis. Trinity College Dublin. (In preparation).Google Scholar
- Chi Thanh Vi, Damien Ablart, Elia Gatti, Carlos Velasco, and Marianna Obrist. 2017. Not just seeing, but also feeling art: Mid-air haptic experiences integrated in a multisensory art exhibition. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 108 (June 2017), 1--14. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ezgl Ucar. 2015. Multisensory Met: Touch, Smell, and Hear Art. Retrieved June 4, 2019 from https://www.metmuseum.org/blogs/digital-underground/2015/ multisensory-metGoogle Scholar
- Natalia Vainstein, Tsvi Kuflik, and Joel Lanir. 2016. Towards Using Mobile, Head- Worn Displays in Cultural Heritage: User Requirements and a Research Agenda. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '16). ACM, NewYork, NY, USA, 327--331. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Protocol to Build a Framework for Designing an Interactive Tool for Art Gallery Visitors
Comments