skip to main content
10.1145/3345768.3355919acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

VuLCAN: A Low-cost, Low-power Embedded Visible Light Communication And Networking Platform

Published:25 November 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Visible Light Communication (VLC) offers a key alternative to the spectrum-challenged Radio Frequency (RF)-based forms of data transmission by tapping an unutilized and unregulated frequency band. Carefully designed low-cost VLC devices have the potential to enable the Internet of Things (IoT) at scale by reducing the current RF spectrum congestion, which is one of the major obstacles to the pervasiveness of the IoT. Wide adoption of VLC devices is however hindered by their current shortcomings, including low data rate, very short range and inability to communicate in noisy environment. In this paper we describe a new software-defined VLC prototype named VuLCAN for Visible Light Communication And Networking that overcomes these limitations. VuLCAN is based on an ARM Cortex M7 core microcontroller with fast sampling analog-to-digital converter along with power-optimized Digital Signal Processing (DSP) libraries. Using BFSK modulation, the prototype achieves a data rate of 65 Kbps over a communication range of 4.5 m. VuLCAN also provides robust and reliable communications in highly illuminated environments (up to 800 lux) using only a low power Light Emitting Diode (LED), largely exceeding the capabilities of current state-of-the-art prototypes.

References

  1. D. A. Basnayaka and H. Haas. 2015. Hybrid RF and VLC Systems: Improving User Data Rate Performance of VLC Systems. In Proceedings of IEEE VTC. IEEE, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J.V. Candy. 2016. CHIRP-Like Signals: Estimation, Detection and Processing A Sequential Model-Based Approach. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Department of Energy, United States.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. N. Cen, J. Jagannath, S. Moretti, Z. Guan, and T. Melodia. 2019. LANET: Visible-light ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Networks, Vol. 84 (March 2019), 107--123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. F. Chang, W. Hu, D. Lee, and C. Yu. 2017. Design and implementation of anti low-frequency noise in visible light communications. In Proceedings of ICASI. 1536--1538.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Cw. Chow, Ch. Yeh, Y. Liu, and Yf. Liu. 2012. Digital signal processing for light emitting diode based visible light communication. IEEE Photon. Soc. Newsletter (October 2012), 9--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. Costanzo, V. Loscri', and S. Costanzo. 2018. Adaptive dual color visible light communication (VLC) system. Trends and Advances in Information Systems and Technologies, Vol. 746 (May 2018), 1478--1487.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. Duque, R. Stanica, H. Rivano, and A. Desportes. 2016. Unleashing the power of LED-to-camera communications for IoT devices. In Proceedings of ACM Workshop on Visible Light Communication Systems. ACM, 55--60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Galisteo, D. Juara, and D. Giustiniano. 2019. Research in visible light communication systems with OpenVLC1.3. In In Proceedings of IEEE WF-IOT. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. R. Garcia-Retegui, S. A. Gonzalez, M. A. Funes, and S. Maestri. 2007. Implementation of a novel synchronization method using Sliding Goertzel DFT. In Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing. IEEE, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. H. Haas, L. Yin, Y. Wang, and C. Chen. 2016. What is LiFi? Journal of Lightwave Technology , Vol. 34, 6 (March 2016), 1533--1544.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. S. Haykin. 2009. Communication Systems .Wiley Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Heydariaan, S. Yin, O. Gnawali, D. Puccinelli, and D. Giustiniano. 2016. Embedded visible light communication: Link measurements and interpretation. In Proceedings of EWSN. Junction Publishing, 341--346.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Hranilovic. 2009. Wireless Optical Communication Systems .Springer-Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. S.M. Kay. 1993. Fundamentals of statistical signal processing .Prentice Hall PTR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. L. Klaver and M. Zuniga. 2015. Shine : A step towards distributed multi-hop visible light communication. In Proceedings of IEEE MASS. IEEE, 235--243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. L. Li, P. Hu, C. Peng, G. Shen, and F. Zhao. 2014. Epsilon: A Visible Light Based Positioning System. In USENIX Symposium on NSDI. USENIX Association, 331--343.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S. Li, A. Pandharipande, and F. M. J. Willems. 2017. Two-way visible light communication and illumination with LEDs. IEEE Transactions on Communications , Vol. 65, 2 (Feb 2017), 740--750.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. C. Liu, X. Jin, W. Zhu, M. Jin, and Z. Xu. 2017. Demonstration of a low complexity ARM-based indoor VLC transceiver under strong interference. In Proceedings of IWCMC. IEEE, 622--627.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. ST Microelectronics. 2019. STM32, ARM Cortex- M 7 Nucleo-144 development board. https://www.st.com/en/evaluation-tools/nucleo-f767zi.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. P. H. Pathak, X. Feng, P. Hu, and P. Mohapatra. 2015. Visible Light Communication, Networking, and Sensing: A Survey, Potential and Challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials , Vol. 17, 4 (2015), 2047--2077.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. John G. Proakis and Dimitris K. Manolakis. 2006. Digital Signal Processing .Prentice-Hall, Inc., NJ,USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. S. Schmid, T. Bourchas, S. Mangold, and T.R. Gross. 2015. Linux Light Bulbs: Enabling internet protocol connectivity for light bulb networks. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Visible Light Communications Systems. ACM, 3--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. S. Schmid, G. Corbellini, S. Mangold, and T.R. Gross. 2013. LED-to-LED visible light communication networks. In Proceedings of ACM MobiHoc. ACM, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. S. Schmid, B. von Deschwanden, S. Mangold, and T R. Gross. 2017. Adaptive software-defined visible light communication networks. In Proceedings of IEEE/ACM IoTDI. IEEE, 109--120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Z. Tian, K. Wright, and X. Zhou. 2016. The Darklight Rises: Visible light communication in the Dark: Demo. In In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom. ACM, New York City, New York, 495--496.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. D. Tsonev, S. Videv, and H. Haas. 2015. Towards a 100 Gb/s visible light wireless access network. Optics Express, Vol. 23, 2 (Jan 2015), 1627--1637.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Q. Wang, Giustiniano, and D. Puccinelli. 2015. An open source research platform for embedded visible light networking. IEEE Wireless Communications , Vol. 22, 2 (April 2015), 94--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Q. Wang, D. Giustiniano, and M. Zuniga. 2018. In light and in darkness, in motion and in stillness: A reliable and adaptive receiver for the internet of lights. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 36, 1 (2018), 149--161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. S. Yin and O. Gnawali. 2016. Towards embedded visible light communication robust to dynamic ambient light. In Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. S. Yin, N. Smaoui, M. Heydariaan, and O. Gnawali. 2018. Purple VLC: Accelerating visible light communication in room-area through PRU offloading. In Proceedings of ACM EWSN. Madrid, Spain, Madrid, Spain, 67--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Y. Zhao and J. Vongkulbhisal. 2013. Design of visible light communication receiver for on-off keying modulation by adaptive minimum-voltage cancelation. Engineering Journal, Vol. 17, 4 (June 2013), 125--129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. VuLCAN: A Low-cost, Low-power Embedded Visible Light Communication And Networking Platform

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          MSWIM '19: Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems
          November 2019
          340 pages
          ISBN:9781450369046
          DOI:10.1145/3345768

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 25 November 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate398of1,577submissions,25%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader