ABSTRACT
Missions involving multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) typically require UAVs to share their state of execution with each other in a dynamic way to support the execution of cooperative/collaborative tasks. Providing survivability and QoS in such communication are important research challenges when searching for reliable transmission of data. Since VANETs have similar characteristics to UAV networks regarding mobility and dynamic change of topology, using the IEEE 802.11p (WAVE) for UAV networks has become more frequent. In this context, the aim of this work is to provide a performance comparison between IEEE 802.11p (WAVE) and IEEE 802.11n (WiFi) standards. A simulated scenario of UAV's mobility was developed by integrating NS-3 and SUMO simulation tools. We compare and analyze IEEE 802.11n 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz using DCF and EDCA coordination functions, and IEEE 802.11p EDCA performances. Different from other works, this work evaluates these standards in respect to reliability and survivability of the UAV network while transmitting different access classes of ToS.
- IEEE Std 1609.4. 2011. IEEE Standard for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE)--Multi-channel Operation. IEEE Std 1609.4--2010 (Revision of IEEE Std 1609.4--2006) (2011), 1--89. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2011.5712769Google Scholar
- IEEE Std 802.11. 2009. IEEE Standard for Information technology-- Local and metropolitan area networks-- Specific requirements-- Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC)and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications Amendment 5: Enhancements for Higher Throughput. IEEE Std 802.11n-2009 (Amendment to IEEE Std 802.11--2007 as amended by IEEE Std 802.11k-2008, IEEE Std 802.11r-2008, IEEE Std 802.11y-2008, and IEEE Std 802.11w-2009) (2009), 1--51. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2009.5307322Google Scholar
- Ilker Bekmezci, Koray Ozgur Sahingoz, and Samil Temel. 2013. Flying Ad-Hoc Networks (FANETs): A survey. Ad Hoc Networks 11, Article 3 (2013), 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.12.004Google Scholar
- K Hui, D Phillips, and A Kekirigoda. 2017. Beyond Line-of-Sight range extension with OPAL using autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles. In MILCOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM). 279--284. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/MILCOM.2017.8170774Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kin Ping Hui, Damien Phillips, and Asanka Kekirigoda. 2017. Beyond line-ofsight range extension in contested environments with OPAL using autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles. 2017 27th International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference, ITNAC 2017 2017-Janua (2017), 1--5. https://doi. org/10.1109/ATNAC.2017.8215402Google Scholar
- Hassen Hussen, Sung-Chan Choi, and Jong-hong Park. 2018. Perfomance Analysis of MANET Routing Protocols for UAV Communications. 2018 Tenth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN) 1 (2018), 70--72. https: //doi.org/10.1109/ICUFN.2018.8436694Google Scholar
- IEE802.11p. 2010. IEEE Standard for Information technology-- Local and metropolitan area networks-- Specific requirements-- Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications Amendment 6: Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments. IEEE Std 802.11p-2010 (Amendment to IEEE Std 802.11--2007 as amended by IEEE Std 802.11k-2008, IEEE Std 802.11r-2008, IEEE Std 802.11y-2008, IEEE Std 802.11n-2009, and IEEE Std 802.11w-2009) (2010), 1--51. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2010.5514475Google Scholar
- Jose Coelho de Melo Filho, Luci Pirmez, and Jose Ferreira de Rezende. 2003. Dynamic EDCF parameters for QoS control in IEEE 802.11 hot spots. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society 9, 2 (2003), 5--16. https://doi.org/10.1590/ s0104--65002003000300002Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ricardo Moraes, Paulo Portugal, Francisco Vasques, and Jose Alberto Fonseca. 2008. Limitations of the IEEE 802.11e EDCA protocol when supporting real-time communication. IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems - Proceedings, WFCS (2008), 119--128. https://doi.org/10.1109/WFCS.2008.4638712Google ScholarCross Ref
- Omar Sami Oubbati, Abderrahmane Lakas, Fen Zhou, Mesut Güne, Nasreddine Lagraa, and Mohamed Bachir Yagoubi. 2017. Intelligent UAV-assisted routing protocol for urban VANETs. Computer Communications 107 (2017), 93--111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2017.04.001Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jong Hong Park, Sung Chan Choi, Jaeho Kim, and Kwang Ho Won. 2018. Unmanned Aerial System Traffic Management with WAVE Protocol for Collision Avoidance. International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks, ICUFN 2018-July (2018), 8--10. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUFN.2018.8436836Google Scholar
- Billy Pinheiro. [n. d.]. Evalvid-NS3. https://gitlab.com/gercom/evalvid-ns3/Google Scholar
- M. Elena Renda, Giovanni Resta, Paolo Santi, Francesca Martelli, and Alessandro Franchini. 2016. IEEE 802.11p VANets: Experimental evaluation of packet interreception time. Computer Communications 75 (2016), 26--38. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.comcom.2015.06.003Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jürgen Scherer, Bernhard Rinner, Saeed Yahyanejad, Samira Hayat, Even Yanmaz, Torsten Andre, Asif Khan, Vladimir Vukadinovic, Christian Bettstetter, and Hermann Hellwagner. 2015. An Autonomous Multi-UAV System for Search and Rescue. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Micro Aerial Vehicle Networks, Systems, and Applications for Civilian Use - DroNet '15 (2015), 33--38. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750675.2750683Google ScholarDigital Library
- Evsen Yanmaz, Samira Hayat, Jürgen Scherer, and Christian Bettstetter. 2014. Experimental performance analysis of two-hop aerial 802.11 networks. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, WCNC 3 (2014), 3118--3123. https://doi.org/10.1109/WCNC.2014.6953010Google ScholarCross Ref
- Evsen Yanmaz, Saeed Yahyanejad, Bernhard Rinner, Hermann Hellwagner, and Christian Bettstetter. 2018. Drone networks: Communications, coordination, and sensing. Ad Hoc Networks 68 (2018), 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2017. 09.001Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yong Zeng, Rui Zhang, and Teng Joon Lim. 2016. Wireless Communications with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles : Opportunities and Challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine 54, May (2016), 36--42. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2016.7470933Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Performance Analysis of IEEE 802.11p and IEEE 802.11n based on QoS for UAV networks
Recommendations
Impact of IEEE 802.11n Operation on IEEE 802.15.4 Operation
WAINA '09: Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications WorkshopsWireless communication among sensor devices, enabled by IEEE 802.15.4 protocol, is increasingly replacing the existing wired technology in a wide range of monitoring and control applications. IEEE 802.15.4 networks typically operate in 2.4GHz ISM band, ...
Contention-polling duality coordination function for IEEE 802.11 WLAN family
The contention-based DCF suffers from collision seriously under heavy load conditions. In this paper, a novel medium access control protocol called Contention-Polling Duality Coordination Function (CPDCF) is proposed to enhance the DCF-based MAC ...
Efficient MAC strategies for the IEEE 802.11n wireless LANs: Research Articles
Current IEEE 802.11 wireless local area network (WLAN) standard products can provide up to 54 Mbps raw transmission rate, while non-standard WLAN products with 108 Mbps have already appeared in the market, and the next generation WLAN will provide much ...
Comments