skip to main content
10.1145/3345838.3356008acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Performance Analysis of IEEE 802.11p and IEEE 802.11n based on QoS for UAV networks

Published:25 November 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Missions involving multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) typically require UAVs to share their state of execution with each other in a dynamic way to support the execution of cooperative/collaborative tasks. Providing survivability and QoS in such communication are important research challenges when searching for reliable transmission of data. Since VANETs have similar characteristics to UAV networks regarding mobility and dynamic change of topology, using the IEEE 802.11p (WAVE) for UAV networks has become more frequent. In this context, the aim of this work is to provide a performance comparison between IEEE 802.11p (WAVE) and IEEE 802.11n (WiFi) standards. A simulated scenario of UAV's mobility was developed by integrating NS-3 and SUMO simulation tools. We compare and analyze IEEE 802.11n 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz using DCF and EDCA coordination functions, and IEEE 802.11p EDCA performances. Different from other works, this work evaluates these standards in respect to reliability and survivability of the UAV network while transmitting different access classes of ToS.

References

  1. IEEE Std 1609.4. 2011. IEEE Standard for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE)--Multi-channel Operation. IEEE Std 1609.4--2010 (Revision of IEEE Std 1609.4--2006) (2011), 1--89. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2011.5712769Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. IEEE Std 802.11. 2009. IEEE Standard for Information technology-- Local and metropolitan area networks-- Specific requirements-- Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC)and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications Amendment 5: Enhancements for Higher Throughput. IEEE Std 802.11n-2009 (Amendment to IEEE Std 802.11--2007 as amended by IEEE Std 802.11k-2008, IEEE Std 802.11r-2008, IEEE Std 802.11y-2008, and IEEE Std 802.11w-2009) (2009), 1--51. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2009.5307322Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ilker Bekmezci, Koray Ozgur Sahingoz, and Samil Temel. 2013. Flying Ad-Hoc Networks (FANETs): A survey. Ad Hoc Networks 11, Article 3 (2013), 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.12.004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. K Hui, D Phillips, and A Kekirigoda. 2017. Beyond Line-of-Sight range extension with OPAL using autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles. In MILCOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM). 279--284. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/MILCOM.2017.8170774Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Kin Ping Hui, Damien Phillips, and Asanka Kekirigoda. 2017. Beyond line-ofsight range extension in contested environments with OPAL using autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles. 2017 27th International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference, ITNAC 2017 2017-Janua (2017), 1--5. https://doi. org/10.1109/ATNAC.2017.8215402Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hassen Hussen, Sung-Chan Choi, and Jong-hong Park. 2018. Perfomance Analysis of MANET Routing Protocols for UAV Communications. 2018 Tenth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN) 1 (2018), 70--72. https: //doi.org/10.1109/ICUFN.2018.8436694Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. IEE802.11p. 2010. IEEE Standard for Information technology-- Local and metropolitan area networks-- Specific requirements-- Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications Amendment 6: Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments. IEEE Std 802.11p-2010 (Amendment to IEEE Std 802.11--2007 as amended by IEEE Std 802.11k-2008, IEEE Std 802.11r-2008, IEEE Std 802.11y-2008, IEEE Std 802.11n-2009, and IEEE Std 802.11w-2009) (2010), 1--51. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2010.5514475Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jose Coelho de Melo Filho, Luci Pirmez, and Jose Ferreira de Rezende. 2003. Dynamic EDCF parameters for QoS control in IEEE 802.11 hot spots. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society 9, 2 (2003), 5--16. https://doi.org/10.1590/ s0104--65002003000300002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Ricardo Moraes, Paulo Portugal, Francisco Vasques, and Jose Alberto Fonseca. 2008. Limitations of the IEEE 802.11e EDCA protocol when supporting real-time communication. IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems - Proceedings, WFCS (2008), 119--128. https://doi.org/10.1109/WFCS.2008.4638712Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Omar Sami Oubbati, Abderrahmane Lakas, Fen Zhou, Mesut Güne, Nasreddine Lagraa, and Mohamed Bachir Yagoubi. 2017. Intelligent UAV-assisted routing protocol for urban VANETs. Computer Communications 107 (2017), 93--111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2017.04.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jong Hong Park, Sung Chan Choi, Jaeho Kim, and Kwang Ho Won. 2018. Unmanned Aerial System Traffic Management with WAVE Protocol for Collision Avoidance. International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks, ICUFN 2018-July (2018), 8--10. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUFN.2018.8436836Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Billy Pinheiro. [n. d.]. Evalvid-NS3. https://gitlab.com/gercom/evalvid-ns3/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Elena Renda, Giovanni Resta, Paolo Santi, Francesca Martelli, and Alessandro Franchini. 2016. IEEE 802.11p VANets: Experimental evaluation of packet interreception time. Computer Communications 75 (2016), 26--38. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.comcom.2015.06.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jürgen Scherer, Bernhard Rinner, Saeed Yahyanejad, Samira Hayat, Even Yanmaz, Torsten Andre, Asif Khan, Vladimir Vukadinovic, Christian Bettstetter, and Hermann Hellwagner. 2015. An Autonomous Multi-UAV System for Search and Rescue. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Micro Aerial Vehicle Networks, Systems, and Applications for Civilian Use - DroNet '15 (2015), 33--38. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750675.2750683Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Evsen Yanmaz, Samira Hayat, Jürgen Scherer, and Christian Bettstetter. 2014. Experimental performance analysis of two-hop aerial 802.11 networks. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, WCNC 3 (2014), 3118--3123. https://doi.org/10.1109/WCNC.2014.6953010Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Evsen Yanmaz, Saeed Yahyanejad, Bernhard Rinner, Hermann Hellwagner, and Christian Bettstetter. 2018. Drone networks: Communications, coordination, and sensing. Ad Hoc Networks 68 (2018), 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2017. 09.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Yong Zeng, Rui Zhang, and Teng Joon Lim. 2016. Wireless Communications with Unmanned Aerial Vehicles : Opportunities and Challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine 54, May (2016), 36--42. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2016.7470933Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Performance Analysis of IEEE 802.11p and IEEE 802.11n based on QoS for UAV networks

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              DIVANet '19: Proceedings of the 9th ACM Symposium on Design and Analysis of Intelligent Vehicular Networks and Applications
              November 2019
              119 pages
              ISBN:9781450369077
              DOI:10.1145/3345838
              • General Chair:
              • Mirela Notare,
              • Program Chair:
              • Peng Sun

              Copyright © 2019 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 25 November 2019

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate70of308submissions,23%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader