skip to main content
10.1145/3347122.3347137acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmocoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

First Steps in Dance Data Science: Educational Design

Published:10 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

We report results of a design-research effort to develop a culturally-relevant educational experience that can engage high school dancers in statistics and data science. In partnership with a local high school and members of its step team, we explore quantitative analysis of both visual and acoustic data captured from student dance. We describe prototype visualizations and interactive applications for evaluating pose precision, tempo, and timbre. With educational goals in mind, we have constrained our design to using only interpretable features and simple, accessible algorithms.

References

  1. Dor Abrahamson and Arthur Bakker. 2016. Making sense of movement in embodied design for mathematics learning. Cognitive research: principles and implications 1, 1 (2016), 33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Brittany Aronson. 2016. The Theory and Practice of Culturally Relevant Education: A Synthesis of Research Across Content Areas. Review of Educational Research 86, 1 (2016), 163--206. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582066Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Dani Ben-Zvi, Katie Makar, and Joan Garfield (Eds.). 2018. International handbook of research in statistics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2010.495279Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ran Bernstein, Tal Shafir, Rachelle Tsachor, Karen Studd, and Assaf Schuster. 2015. Laban Movement Analysis Using Kinect. International Journal of Computer, Electrical, Automation, Control and Information Engineering (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sebastian Böck, Florian Krebs, and Markus Schedl. 2012. Evaluating the Online Capabilities Of Onset Detection Methods. In ISMIR. 49--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Sebastian Böck and Gerhard Widmer. 2013. Maximum Filter Vibrato Suppression for Onset Detection. In Proc. of the 16th Int. Conf. on Digital Audio Effects (DAFx). Maynooth, Ireland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Antonio Camurri, Gualtiero Volpe, Stefano Piana, Maurizio Mancini, Radoslaw Niewiadomski, Nicola Ferrari, and Corrado Canepa. 2016. The Dancer in the Eye: Towards a Multi-Layered Computational Framework of Qualities in Movement. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Movement and Computing (2016), 6:1--6:7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jacky C P Chan, Howard Leung, Jeff K T Tang, and Taku Komura. 2011. A virtual reality dance training system using motion capture technology. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 4, 2 (2011), 187--195. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2010.27Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Seyed Hossein Chavoshi, Bernard De Baets, Tijs Neutens, Guy De Tré, and Nico Van De Weghe. 2015. Exploring dance movement data using sequence alignment methods. PLoS ONE 10, 7 (2015), 1--25. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132452Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Thomas H. Davenport and D.J. Patil. 2012. Data scientist: The sexiest job of the 21st century. Harvard Business Review (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kayla DesPortes, Monet Spells, and Betsy DiSalvo. 2016. The MoveLab: Developing Congruence Between Students' Self-Concepts and Computing. Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education - SIGCSE '16 (2016), 267--272. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844586Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Helen M. Doerr, Robert Delmas, and Katie Makar. 2017. A modeling approach to the development of students' informal inferential reasoning1. Statistics Education Research Journal 16, 2 (2017), 86--115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Augusto dos Santos, Kalina Yacef, and Roberto Martinez-Maldonado. 2017. Forró Trainer: Automated Feedback for Partner Dance Learning. Adjunct Publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization - UMAP '17 (2017), 103--104. https://doi.org/10.1145/3099023.3099032Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Daniel C Edelson and Diana M Joseph. 2004. The interest-driven learning design framework: motivating learning through usefulness. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Learning sciences. International Society of the Learning Sciences, 166--173.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Daniel P.W. Ellis. 2007. Beat tracking by dynamic programming. Journal of New Music Research (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/09298210701653344Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Elizabeth C Fine. 1991. Stepping, saluting, cracking, and freaking: The cultural politics of African-American step shows. TDR 35, 2 (1991), 39--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Elizabeth Calvert Fine. 2003. Soulstepping: African American Step Shows. University of Illinois Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Joan Garfield. 2002. The challenge of developing statistical reasoning. Journal of Statistics Education 10, 3 (2002).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Norma González, Rosi Andrade, Marta Civil, and Luis Moll. 2004. Bridging Funds of Distributed Knowledge: Creating Zones of Practices in Mathematics., 115--132 pages. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327671espr0601-2{_}7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Perfecto Herrera, Alexandre Yeterian, and Fabien Gouyon. 2002. Automatic Classification of Drum Sounds: A Comparison of Feature Selection Methods and Classification Techniques. In International Conference on Music and Artificial Intelligence. Springer, 69--80. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45722-4{_}8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. G. Hidalgo, Z. Cao, T. Simon, S.-E. Wei, H.Joo, and Y. Sheikh. [n. d.]. OpenPose library.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Clifford Konold. 2007. Designing a Data Analysis Tool for Learners. In Thinking with data: The 33rd Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, Marsha Lovett and P Shah (Eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillside, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Sohaib Laraba and JoÃńlle Tilmanne. 2012. VideoâĂŘdriven stateâĂŘaware facial animation. Animation and Virtual Worlds (2012), 321--329. https://doi.org/10.1002/cavGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Victor R. Lee and Joel Drake. 2013. Quantified Recess: Design of an Activity for Elementary Students Involving Analyses of Their Own Movement Data. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children 2013 (2013), 273--276. https://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485822Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Richard Lehrer, Min Joung Kim, and Ryan Seth Jones. 2011. Developing conceptions of statistics by designing measures of distribution. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education 43, 5 (2011), 723--736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0347-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Yotam Mann. 2015. Interactive Music with Tone.js. In Proceedings of the 1st annual Web Audio Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Brian McFee, Matt McVicar, Colin Raffel, Dawen Liang, Oriol Nieto, Josh Moore, Dan Ellis, Douglas Repetto, Petr Viktorin, JoÃčo Felipe Santos, and Adrian Holovaty. 2015. librosa: v0.4.0. (6 2015). https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.18369Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Django Paris. 2012. Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher 41, 3 (2012), 93--97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Herbert J Rubin and Irene S Rubin. 2011. Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Takaaki Shiratori, A. Nakazawa, and K. Ikeuchi. 2004. Detecting Dance Motion Structure Using Motion. Proc. 10th Int. Conf. on Virtual Systems and Multimedia, VSMM 4 (2004), 1287--1296.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Jennifer Uharriet. 1996. From Gumboots and Greek Letters Preserving African American heritage through stepping. (1996).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Barbara Y White and John R Frederiksen. 1998. Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students. Cognition and Instruction 16, 1 (1998), 3--118. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1601{_}2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Margaret Wilson. 2002. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9, 4 (2002), 625--636.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. First Steps in Dance Data Science: Educational Design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MOCO '19: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Movement and Computing
      October 2019
      23 pages
      ISBN:9781450376549
      DOI:10.1145/3347122

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 October 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate50of110submissions,45%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader