skip to main content
10.1145/3347146.3359365acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Push-based Spatial Crowdsourcing for Enriching Semantic Tags in OpenStreetMap

Published: 05 November 2019 Publication History

Abstract

OpenStreetMap (OSM) is a popular community-driven mapping platform with voluntary contributions from (amateur) cartographers. However, it is a difficult process for the cartographer to identify the areas where she can best contribute to OSM. Furthermore, the current OSM spatial entities are missing many tags; for example, top three road network tags, Name, Source, and Surface, are available only for the 10% of the total road segments. Our paper aims to improve the quantity and quality of the road network tags by actively pushing the nearest road segments for the cartographer to be mapped. We propose a push-based spatial crowdsourcing method to achieve this objective, and validate it by focusing on road segments in OSM. Specifically, we formally define the batch-based maximum road segment task assignment problem and suggest methods based on heuristics like travel distance and road segment task grouping. Finally, our experimental evaluation verify the applicability of our assignment solutions by comparing the resulting number of assigned tasks. With regard to the number of assigned road segments, our junctions-based and road segment-based heuristic methods, outperform the baseline methods by five and two times, respectively.

References

[1]
C Chen, S.-F. Cheng, A Gunawan, A Misra, K Dasgupta, and D Chander. 2014. Traccs: A framework for trajectory-aware coordinated urban crowd-sourcing. In HCOMP. 30--40.
[2]
P Cheng, X Lian, L Chen, and C Shahabi. 2017. Prediction-based task assignment in spatial crowdsourcing. In ICDE. IEEE, 997--1008.
[3]
S.R.B Gummidi, X Xie, and T.B Pedersen. 2019. A Survey of Spatial Crowdsourcing. ACM TODS 44, 2 (2019), 8.
[4]
L Kazemi and C Shahabi. 2012. Geocrowd: enabling query answering with spatial crowdsourcing. In GIS. 189--198.
[5]
Jon Kleinberg and Eva Tardos. 2006. Algorithm design. Pearson Education India.
[6]
H To, C Shahabi, and L Kazemi. 2015. A server-assigned spatial crowdsourcing framework. TSAS 1, 1 (2015), 2.
[7]
L Tran, H To, L Fan, and C Shahabi. 2017. A Real-Time Framework for Task Assignment in Hyperlocal Spatial Crowdsourcing. TIST (2017), 37.
[8]
Y Wang, L Huang, T Gu, H Wei, K Xing, and J Zhang. 2014. Data-driven traffic flow analysis for vehicular communications. In INFOCOM. IEEE, 1977-1985.
[9]
X Xie, P Jin, M.L Yiu, J Du, M Yuan, and C.S Jensen. 2016. Enabling scalable geographic service sharing with weighted imprecise voronoi cells. TKDE 28, 2 (2016), 439--453.

Index Terms

  1. Push-based Spatial Crowdsourcing for Enriching Semantic Tags in OpenStreetMap

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGSPATIAL '19: Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
      November 2019
      648 pages
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 05 November 2019

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. OpenStreetMap
      2. Road Network
      3. Semantic Tags
      4. Spatial Crowdsourcing
      5. Task Assignment

      Qualifiers

      • Poster
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      SIGSPATIAL '19
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGSPATIAL '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 34 of 161 submissions, 21%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 257 of 1,238 submissions, 21%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 137
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 25 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media