skip to main content
10.1145/3347318.3355523acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Prediction of Future Shot Direction using Pose and Position of Tennis Player

Published:15 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we propose a method to predict the future shot direction in a tennis match using pose information and player position. As far as we know, there is no work that deals with such a predictive task, so there is no shot direction dataset as yet. Therefore, using a YouTube tennis match video, we construct an time of impact and shot direction dataset. To reduce annotation costs, we propose a method to automatically label the shot direction. Moreover, we propose a method to predict the future shot direction using the constructed dataset. The shot direction is predicted using LSTM(long short-time memory), from sequential pose information up to the time of impact and the player position. We employ OpenPose to extract the position of skeleton joints. In the experiment, we evaluate the accuracy of shot direction prediction and verify the effectiveness of the proposed method. Since there are no studies that predict future shot direction, we set four baseline methods to evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed method.

References

  1. YI Abdel-Aziz, HM Karara, and Michael Hauck. 2015. Direct linear transformation from comparator coordinates into object space coordinates in close-range photogrammetry. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing , Vol. 81, 2 (2015), 103--107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Andrew Blake and Michael Isard. 1997. The condensation algorithm-conditional density propagation and applications to visual tracking. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 361--367.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jiaxin Cai and Xin Tang. [n. d.]. RGB video based tennis action recognition using a deep weighted long short-term memory. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.00845 ([n. d.]).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Zixi Cai, Helmut Neher, Kanav Vats, David A Clausi, and John Zelek. 2019. Temporal hockey action recognition via pose and optical flows. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (5th International Workshop on Computer Vision in Sports (CVsports)). 0--0.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Zhe Cao, Tomas Simon, Shih-En Wei, and Yaser Sheikh. 2017. Realtime multi-person 2d pose estimation using part affinity fields. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2017). 1302--1310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Lluis Castrejon, Kaustav Kundu, Raquel Urtasun, and Sanja Fidler. 2017. Annotating object instances with a polygon-rnn. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2017). 5230--5238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Teofilo De Campos, Mark Barnard, Krystian Mikolajczyk, Josef Kittler, Fei Yan, William Christmas, and David Windridge. 2011. An evaluation of bags-of-words and spatio-temporal shapes for action recognition. In IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV2011). 344--351.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei-Fei. 2009. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2009). 248--255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Hossein Fani, Amin Mirlohi, Hawre Hosseini, and Rainer Herperst. 2018. Swim stroke analytic: Front crawl pulling pose classification. In 2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). 4068--4072.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Sofia Gourgari, Georgios Goudelis, Konstantinos Karpouzis, and Stefanos Kollias. 2013. Thetis: Three dimensional tennis shots a human action dataset. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. 676--681.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural computation , Vol. 9, 8 (1997), 1735--1780.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. [n. d.]. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. CoRR , Vol. abs/1412.6980 ([n. d.]).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ryunosuke Kurose, Masaki Hayashi, Takeo Ishii, and Yoshimitsu Aoki. 2018. Player pose analysis in tennis video based on pose estimation. In 2018 International Workshop on Advanced Image Technology (IWAIT 2018). 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Johannes Landlinger, Stefan Lindinger, Thomas Stöggl, Herbert Wagner, and Erich Müller. 2010. Key factors and timing patterns in the tennis forehand of different skill levels. Journal of sports science & medicine , Vol. 9, 4 (2010), 643.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Dollár, and C Lawrence Zitnick. 2014. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In European conference on computer vision (ECCV2014). 740--755.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Tomoyuki Mishina Masaki Takahashi, Toshiyuki Nakamura. 2014. A method of soccer ball tracking from several viewpoints using a machine learning algorithm. In The Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers. 5--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Vito Reno, Nicola Mosca, Roberto Marani, Massimiliano Nitti, Tiziana D'Orazio, and Ettore Stella. 2018. Convolutional neural networks-based ball detection in tennis games. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. 1758--1764.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. [n. d.]. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 ([n. d.]).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Michal Sipko and William Knottenbelt. 2015. Machine learning for the prediction of professional tennis matches. MEng computing-final year project, Imperial College London (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jialei Wang, Peilin Zhao, and Steven CH Hoi. [n. d.]. Exact soft confidence-weighted learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1206.4612 ([n. d.]).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Fei Yan, W Christmas, and Josef Kittler. 2005. A tennis ball tracking algorithm for automatic annotation of tennis match. In British machine vision conference (BMVC 2005), Vol. 2. 619--628.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Dani Yogatama, Phil Blunsom, Chris Dyer, Edward Grefenstette, and Wang Ling. [n. d.]. Learning to compose words into sentences with reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.09100 ([n. d.]).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Xiangzeng Zhou, Qiang Huang, Lei Xie, and Stephen Cox. 2013. A two layered data association approach for ball tracking. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP 2013) . 2317--2321.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Prediction of Future Shot Direction using Pose and Position of Tennis Player

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MMSports '19: Proceedings Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Multimedia Content Analysis in Sports
      October 2019
      120 pages
      ISBN:9781450369114
      DOI:10.1145/3347318

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 October 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate29of49submissions,59%

      Upcoming Conference

      MM '24
      MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
      October 28 - November 1, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader