skip to main content
10.1145/3349263.3351341acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Where we come from and where we are going: a review of automated driving studies

Published: 21 September 2019 Publication History

Abstract

During the last decade, research has conducted a large amount of studies that investigated driving automation from the Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) perspective. Due to the many possibilities for study design concerning investigated constructs, data collection and parameters, at present, the pool of findings is heterogeneous and nontransparent. This literature review applies a structured approach in reviewing scientific papers that investigated driving automation and allows a statement on the status quo of existing methodological approaches. Most studies focused on safety followed by trust and acceptance. Driving/Take-Over Request (TOR) performance also marked a significant portion, however many different parameters are investigated. First results identify gaps to be addressed in future studies and allow researchers to investigate known constructs with established methods.

References

[1]
Daniel Damböck and Klaus Bengler. 2012. Übernahmezeiten beim hochautomatisierten Fahren. In 5. Tagung Fahrerassistenz.
[2]
Fred D. Davis. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS quarterly 13, 3 (1989), 319.
[3]
Murat Dikmen and Catherine M Burns. 2016. Autonomous driving in the real world: Experiences with tesla autopilot and summon. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications. ACM, 225--228.
[4]
DIN-EN ISO. 2011. Ergonomie der Mensch-System-Interaktion - Teil 210: Prozess zur Gestaltung gebrauchstauglicher interaktiver Systeme. (2011).
[5]
Alexander Eriksson and Neville A Stanton. 2017. Takeover time in highly automated vehicles: noncritical transitions to and from manual control. Human factors 59, 4 (2017), 689--705.
[6]
Anna Feldhütter, Christoph Segler, and Klaus Bengler. 2017. Does Shifting Between Conditionally and Partially Automated Driving Lead to a Loss of Mode Awareness? (International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics). Los Angeles, CA, USA.
[7]
Yannick Forster, Sebastian Hergeth, Frederik Naujoks, Matthias Beggiato, Josef F. Krems, and Andreas Keinath. 2019. Learning to Use Automation: Behavioral Changes in Interaction with Automated Driving Systems. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 62 (2019), 599--614.
[8]
Yannick Forster, Sebastian Hergeth, Frederik Naujoks, and Josef F. Krems. 2018. How Usability can Save the Day: Methodological Considerations for Making Automated Driving a Success Story. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Birsen Donmez, Bruce N. Walker, and Klaus Fröhlich (Eds.).
[9]
Anna-Katharina Frison, Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Riener, and Clemens Schartmüller. 2017. Driving Hotzenplotz: A Hybrid Interface for Vehicle Control Aiming to Maximize Pleasure in Highway Driving. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. 236--244.
[10]
Christian Gold, Daniel Damböck, Lutz Lorenz, and Klaus Bengler. 2013. "Take over!" How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? (Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting), Vol. 1.
[11]
Sandra G Hart and Lowell E Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology. Vol. 52. Elsevier, 139--183.
[12]
Tove Helldin, Göran Falkman, Maria Riveiro, and Staffan Davidsson. 2013. Presenting system uncertainty in automotive UIs for supporting trust calibration in autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications. ACM, 210--217.
[13]
Sebastian Hergeth, Lutz Lorenz, Roman Vilimek, and Josef F. Krems. 2016. Keep your scanners peeled: Gaze behavior as a measure of automation trust during highly automated driving. Human factors 58, 3 (2016), 509--519.
[14]
Oliver Jarosch, Matthias Kuhnt, Svenja Paradies, and Klaus Bengler. 2017. It's Out of Our Hands Now! Effects of Non-Driving Related Tasks During Highly Automated Driving on Drivers' Fatigue (The 9th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design). Manchester Village, VT, USA.
[15]
Gwendolin Knappe, Andreas Keinath, and Cristina Meinecke. 2006. Empfehlungen für die Bestimmung der Spurhaltegüte im Kontext der Fahrsimulation. MMi-interaktiv 11 (2006), 3--13.
[16]
Jiin Lee, Naeun Kim, Chaerin Imm, Beomjun Kim, Kyongsu Yi, and Jinwoo Kim. 2016. A question of trust: An ethnographic study of automated cars on real roads. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM, 201--208.
[17]
Natasha Merat, A. Hamish Jamson, Frank C.H. Lai, Michael Daly, and Oliver M.J. Carsten. 2014. Transition to manual: Driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 27 (2014), 274--282.
[18]
Frederik Naujoks, Christoph Mai, and Alexandra Neukum. 2014. The effect of urgency of take-over requests during highly automated driving under distraction conditions. Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation 7, Part I (2014), 431.
[19]
Ingrid Pettersson, Florian Lachner, Anna-Katharina Frison, Andreas Riener, and Andreas Butz. A Bermuda Triangle? A Review of Method Application and Triangulation in User Experience Evaluation. In the 2018 CHI Conference, Regan Mandryk, Mark Hancock, Mark Perry, and Anna Cox (Eds.). 1--16.
[20]
SAE. 2018. Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-Road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems. (2018).
[21]
Philipp Wintersberger, Paul Green, and Andreas Riener. 2017. Am I driving or are you or are we both? A taxonomy for handover and handback in automated driving (The 9th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design). Manchester Village, VT, USA.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Reality Check: How Do Real-World Users Experience Current Automated Driving Systems?Adjunct Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3641308.3685016(16-20)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Reality Check: Insights from Experienced Users of Current Automated Driving Systems for an Updated AutoUI Research AgendaAdjunct Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3641308.3677401(249-252)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Changing Lanes Toward Open Science: Openness and Transparency in Automotive User ResearchProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3640792.3675730(94-105)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
AutomotiveUI '19: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings
September 2019
524 pages
ISBN:9781450369206
DOI:10.1145/3349263
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 September 2019

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. automated driving
  2. human-automation interaction
  3. literature review
  4. method development

Qualifiers

  • Work in progress

Conference

AutomotiveUI '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 248 of 566 submissions, 44%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 10 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Reality Check: How Do Real-World Users Experience Current Automated Driving Systems?Adjunct Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3641308.3685016(16-20)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Reality Check: Insights from Experienced Users of Current Automated Driving Systems for an Updated AutoUI Research AgendaAdjunct Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3641308.3677401(249-252)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Changing Lanes Toward Open Science: Openness and Transparency in Automotive User ResearchProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3640792.3675730(94-105)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2024
  • (2023)Location-Aware Virtual Reality for Situational Awareness On the RoadProceedings of the 2023 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction10.1145/3607822.3614530(1-12)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Exploring Driver Responses to Authoritative Control Interventions in Highly Automated DrivingProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3580585.3607159(145-155)Online publication date: 18-Sep-2023
  • (2022)Evaluating Automated Vehicle Human–Machine Interfaces and the Relationship Between Preference and Performance MeasuresUser Experience Design in the Era of Automated Driving10.1007/978-3-030-77726-5_8(179-205)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • (2022)The “DAUX Framework”: A Need-Centered Development Approach to Promote Positive User Experience in the Development of Driving AutomationUser Experience Design in the Era of Automated Driving10.1007/978-3-030-77726-5_10(237-271)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2022
  • (2021)The Driving Experience Lab: Simulating the Automotive Future in a Trailer13th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3473682.3481877(225-228)Online publication date: 9-Sep-2021
  • (2020)Where We Come from and Where We Are Going: A Systematic Review of Human Factors Research in Driving AutomationApplied Sciences10.3390/app1024891410:24(8914)Online publication date: 14-Dec-2020
  • (2020)Drivers’ Ability to Engage in a Non-Driving Related Task While in Automated Driving Mode in Real TrafficIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2020.30434288(221654-221668)Online publication date: 2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media