ABSTRACT
Humanitarian aid workers who try to provide aid to the most vulnerable populations in the Middle East or Africa are risking their own lives and safety to help others. The current lack of a collaborative real-time information system to predict threats prevents responders and local partners from developing a shared understanding of potentially threatening situations, causing increased response times and leading to inadequate protection. To solve this problem, this paper presents a threat detection and decision support system that combines knowledge and information from a network of responders with automated and modular threat detection. The system consists of three parts. It first collects textual information, ranging from social media, and online news reports to reports and text messages from a decentralized network of humanitarian staff. Second, the system uses deep neural network techniques to automatically detects a threat or incident and provide information including location, threat category, and casualties. Third, given the type of threat and the information extracted by the NER, a feedforward network proposes a mitigation plan based on humanitarian standard operating procedures. The classified information is rapidly redistributed to potentially affected humanitarian workers at any level. The system testing results show a high precision of 0.91 and 0.98 as well as an F-measure of 0.87 and 0.88 in detecting the threats and decision support respectively. We thus combine the collaborative intelligence of a decentralized network of aid workers with the power of deep neural networks.
- Nezih Altay and Melissa Labonte. 2014. Challenges in humanitarian information management and exchange: evidence from Haiti. Disasters 38, s1 (2014).Google Scholar
- Zahra Ashktorab, Christopher Brown, Manojit Nandi, and Aron Culotta. 2014. Tweedr: Mining twitter to inform disaster response. Proc. of ISCRAM (2014).Google Scholar
- Adam L Berger, Vincent J Della Pietra, and Stephen A Della Pietra. 1996. A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Computational linguistics 22, 1 (1996), 39–71.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michele Berlingerio, Francesco Calabrese, Giusy Di Lorenzo, Xiaowen Dong, Yiannis Gkoufas, and Dimitrios Mavroeidis. 2013. SaferCity: a system for detecting and analyzing incidents from social media. In Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on. IEEE.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tina Comes. 2016. Cognitive biases in humanitarian sensemaking and decision-making lessons from field research. In 2016 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA). IEEE, 56–62.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tina Comes, Olga Vybornova, and Bartel Van de Walle. 2015. Bringing structure to the disaster data typhoon: an analysis of decision-makers’ information needs in the response to Haiyan. In 2015 AAAI Spring Symposium Series.Google Scholar
- Tina Comes, Niek Wijngaards, and Bartel Van de Walle. 2015. Exploring the future: Runtime scenario selection for complex and time-bound decisions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 97 (2015), 29–46.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Muhammad Imran, Carlos Castillo, Fernando Diaz, and Sarah Vieweg. 2015. Processing social media messages in mass emergency: a survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 47, 4 (2015).Google ScholarDigital Library
- Muhammad Imran, Carlos Castillo, Ji Lucas, Patrick Meier, and Sarah Vieweg. 2014. Aidr: Artificial intelligence for disaster response. In Proceedings of the companion publication of the 23rd international conference on World wide web companion.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kirill Kireyev, Leysia Palen, and Kenneth Anderson. 2009. Applications of topics models to analysis of disaster-related twitter data. In NIPS Workshop on Applications for Topic Models: Text and Beyond, Vol. 1. Canada: Whistler.Google Scholar
- Mehdi Ben Lazreg and Morten Goodwin. 2018. Combining a Context Aware Neural Network with a Denoising Autoencoder for Measuring String Similarities. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.06414(2018).Google Scholar
- Aibek Musaev, De Wang, and Calton Pu. 2014. LITMUS: Landslide detection by integrating multiple sources. In 11th International Conference Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM).Google Scholar
- Jakob Rogstadius, Maja Vukovic, CA Teixeira, Vassilis Kostakos, Evangelos Karapanos, and Jim Alain Laredo. 2013. CrisisTracker: Crowdsourced social media curation for disaster awareness. IBM Journal of Research and Development 57, 5 (2013).Google ScholarDigital Library
- Takeshi Sakaki, Makoto Okazaki, and Yutaka Matsuo. 2010. Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Red Cross Societies 2013. World disaster report. Geneva: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (http://www. ifrc. org) (2013).Google Scholar
- Bartel Van de Walle, Bert Brugghemans, and Tina Comes. 2016. Improving situation awareness in crisis response teams: An experimental analysis of enriched information and centralized coordination. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 95 (2016), 66–79.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bartel Van de Walle and Tina Comes. 2015. On the nature of information management in complex and natural disasters. Procedia Engineering 107(2015), 403–411.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jie Yin, Andrew Lampert, Mark Cameron, Bella Robinson, and Robert Power. 2012. Using social media to enhance emergency situation awareness. IEEE Intelligent Systems 27, 6 (2012).Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Not a Target. A Deep Learning Approach for a Warning and Decision Support System to Improve Safety and Security of Humanitarian Aid Workers
Recommendations
Transportation security decision support system for emergency response: A training prototype
During emergencies, decision making is a challenging task requiring immediate and effective action from responders under the pressures of incomplete and erroneous information. Identification of appropriate resources and personnel, proper lines of ...
A decision support system for robust humanitarian facility location
Each year, more than 400 natural disasters hit the world. To be more responsive, humanitarians organize stocks of relief items. It is an issue to know the quantity of items to be stored and where they should be positioned. Many authors have tried to ...
A hybrid decision support system for managing humanitarian relief chains
Decisions regarding location, allocation and distribution of relief items are among the main concerns of the humanitarian relief chain (HRC) managers in response to no-notice large-scale disasters such as earthquakes. In this paper, a hybrid decision ...
Comments