Kiev Gama
ABSTRACT
New approaches that offer good learning experiences driven to computer science education have been applied in different places. One of the ways adopted is the application of dynamics in classrooms that challenge students to work in groups and make relations to situations of their lives. Besides, to improve content retention and students engagement, humor is one good element that should be applied in these dynamics. The "Peanut butter and jelly sandwich challenge" is an example that allows including the idea of challenging students using humor as a support to instructional content. This paper explains how that dynamic was applied to two students' groups. The first experience was offered in a mobile programming course that follows a boot camp style and involved a multidisciplinary group with students from three universities. The dynamic applied was used to present the relevance of algorithmic thinking. The second experience used the first case as motivation, adapting it to cover contents focused on test case writing applied to students of computer science. In both cases we present results gathered, such as learning impact for the students.
- Karen Anewalt. 2008. Making CS0 fun: an active learning approach using toys, games and Alice. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 23, 3 (2008), 98--105.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Ali Basiri, Niosha Behnam, Ruud de Rooij, Lorin Hochstein, Luke Kosewski, Justin Reynolds, and Casey Rosenthal. 2016. Chaos Engineering. IEEE Software 33, 3 (2016), 35--41.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dennis J Bouvier. 2003. Pilot study: living flowcharts in an introduction to programming course. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 35, 1 (2003), 293--295.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Code.Org. 2019. Code.Org. https://code.org Last accessed 15 May 2019.Google Scholar
- Software & Systems Engineering Committee et al. 2008. IEEE standard for software and system test documentation. Fredericksburg, VA, USA: IEEE Computer Society (2008).Google Scholar
- Lee Copeland. 2004. A practitioner's guide to software test design. Artech House.Google Scholar
- Cheryl L Coyle and Heather Vaughn. 2008. Making Peanut Butter and Jelly Sandwiches: Do Students from Different Disciplines Approach This Exercise Differently?. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 52. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 624--628.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Janet Davis and Samuel A Rebelsky. 2007. Food-first computer science: starting the first course right with PB&J. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 39, 1 (2007), 372--376.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stephen H Edwards and Zalia Shams. 2014. Do student programmers all tend to write the same software tests?. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Innovation & technology in computer science education. ACM, 171--176.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sigrid Eldh, Hans Hansson, and Sasikumar Punnekkat. 2011. Analysis of mistakes as a method to improve test case design. In 2011 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation. IEEE, 70--79.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vahid Garousi and Mika V Mäntylä. 2016. When and what to automate in software testing? A multi-vocal literature review. Information and Software Technology 76 (2016), 92--117.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Juan Pablo Hourcade, Olga I Garcia, and Keith B Perry. 2007. Learning observation skills by making peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. In CHI'07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1753--1758.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Apple Inc. 2019. Swift Playgrounds. https://www.apple.com/swift/playgrounds/ Last accessed 15 May 2019.Google Scholar
- Cem Kaner. 2003. What is a good test case. In Software Testing Analysis & Review Conference (STAR) East.Google Scholar
- Tarun Khanna, Ranjay Gulati, and Nitin Nohria. 1998. The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic management journal 19, 3 (1998), 193--210.Google Scholar
- Neelam Kher, Susan Molstad, and Roberta Donahue. 1999. Using humor in the college classroom to enhance teaching effectiveness in'dread courses'. College Student Journal 33, 3 (1999).Google Scholar
- Debra Korobkin. 1988. Humor in the classroom: Considerations and strategies. College teaching 36, 4 (1988), 154--158.Google Scholar
- Gary Lewandowski and Amy Morehead. 1998. Computer science through the eyes of dead monkeys: learning styles and interaction in CS I. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol. 30. ACM, 312--316.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Glenford J Myers, Corey Sandler, and Tom Badgett. 2011. The art of software testing. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rudolf Ramler and Klaus Wolfmaier. 2006. Economic perspectives in test automation: balancing automated and manual testing with opportunity cost. In Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Automation of software test. ACM, 85--91.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yolanda A Rankin and Jakita O Thomas. 2016. Leveraging food to achieve 100% student retention in an intro CS course. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 32, 2 (2016), 127--134.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Samuel A Rebelsky. 2005. The new science students in too much, too soon an abbreviated, accelerated, constructivist, collaborative, introductory experience in CS. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol. 37. ACM, 312--316.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Susan H Rodger. 2002. Introducing computer science through animation and virtual worlds. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol. 34. ACM, 186--190.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Melissa B Wanzer, Ann B Frymier, and Jeffrey Irwin. 2010. An explanation of the relationship between instructor humor and student learning: Instructional humor processing theory. Communication Education 59, 1 (2010), 1--18.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Experimenting with the Peanut Butter and Jelly Sandwich Challenge to Introduce Algorithmic Thinking and Test Case Writing
Recommendations
The Peanut Butter and Jelly Sandwich Challenge as an Approach to Improve Students Abilities in Test Case Writing
ITiCSE '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science EducationTest cases are a set of test inputs, execution conditions, and expected results developed for a particular objective, such as to exercise a particular program path or to verify compliance with a specific requirement. Test cases that are written by ...
Learning observation skills by making peanut butter and jelly sandwiches
CHI EA '07: CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn this report we describe our experience conducting a class activity where students learned and practiced observation skills. In the activity, students in small groups observed and were observed making peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. The groups ...
The challenge of promoting algorithmic thinking of both sciences- and humanities-oriented learners
The research results we present in this paper reveal that properly calibrated e-learning tools have potential to effectively promote the algorithmic thinking of both science-oriented and humanities-oriented students. After students had watched an ...
Comments