ABSTRACT
Mobile Health CrowdSensing (MHCS) is the use of sensor-based smart mobile devices to generate, collect, share and analyse real-time patient data from a population for improving health. The purpose of the paper is to report on a scoping review of research conducted on MHCS using a proposed classification framework. The framework has five categories of attributes (purpose; adoption and barriers; system attributes; software; and benefits and outcomes). Repositories searched were Medline/PubMed, Embase/Science Direct, PsycINFO, EBSCOHOST, IEEE, ACM Digital and accessible University library repositories from January 1998 to December 2018. Certain exclusion criteria were applied. 'Mobile crowd sensing' and 'mobile crowdsensing' keywords were separately used as search terms. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings revealed that MHCS applications in healthcare are scant. Most MHCS studies were from conference proceedings rather than traditional journals because of the fast-pace of technology-driven research. Healthcare research is costly and time-consuming thus there is a need to adopt MHCS as it can contribute towards low cost research due to the affordable devices used in generating, collecting and providing access to real-time data.
- MA Alsheikh, Y Jiao, D Niyato, P Wang, D Leong and Z Han (2017). The Accuracy-Privacy Trade-off of Mobile Crowdsensing. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(6), 132--139Google ScholarDigital Library
- N Archer, U Fevrier-Thomas, C Lokker, KA McKibbon and SE Straus (2011). Personal health records: a scoping review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18(4), 515--522.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H Arksey and L O'Malley (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19--32.Google Scholar
- R Armstrong, BJ Hall, J Doyle and E Waters (2011). 'Scoping the scope' of a Cochrane review. Journal of Public Health, 33(1), 147--150.Google ScholarCross Ref
- CM Banda (2018). A Crowdsensing Method for Water Resource Monitoring in Smart Communities. Master thesis, Nelson Mandela University: South Africa.Google Scholar
- P Bellavista, J De Benedetto, CR De Rolt, L Foschini and R Montanari (2017). LTE proximity discovery for supporting participatory mobile health communities. In Communications (ICC), 2017 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 1--6). IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D Ben-Zeev, SM Kaiser, CJ Brenner, M Begale, J Duffecy and DC Mohr (2013). Development and usability testing of FOCUS: A smartphone system for self-management of schizophrenia. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 36(4), 289--296.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G Cardone, A Corradi, L Foschini and R Ianniello (2016). Participact: A large-scale crowdsensing platform. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 4(1), 21--32. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S Chessa, A Corradi, L Foschini and M Girolami (2016). Empowering mobile crowdsensing through social and ad hoc networking. IEEE Communications Magazine, 54(7), 108--114. Google ScholarDigital Library
- SK Datta, RPF Da Costa, RC Bonnet and J Härri (2016). oneM2M architecture based IoT framework for mobile crowd sensing in smart cities. In: Networks and Communications (EuCNC), 2016 European Conference on (pp. 168--173). IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- ER Dorsey, J de Roulet, JP Thompson, JL Reminick, A Thai, Z White-Stellato, CA Beck, BP George and H Moses (2010). Funding of US biomedical research, 2003--2008. JAMA, 303(2), 137--143.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C Fiandrino, A Capponi, G Cacciatore, D Kliazovich, U Sorger, P Bouvry, B Kantarci, F Granelli and S Giordano (2017). CrowdSenSim: A simulation platform for mobile crowdsensing in realistic urban environments. IEEE Access, 5, 3490--3503.Google Scholar
- C Free, G Phillips, L Galli, L Watson, L Felix, P Edwards, V Patel and A Haines (2013). The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review. PLoS medicine, 10(1), e1001362.Google Scholar
- RK Ganti, F Ye and H Lei (2011). Mobile crowdsensing: current state and future challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(11), 32--39.Google Scholar
- C Gao, F Kong and J Tan (2009). Healthaware: Tackling obesity with health aware smart phone systems. In: Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), 2009 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 1549--1554). IEEE. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E Giannotta (2017). Conception and Realization of a Mobile Crowdsensing Application for Support and Empowerment of Diabetes Patients. Unpublished Master thesis: Ulm University.Google Scholar
- B Guo, Z Yu, X Zhou and D Zhang (2014). From participatory sensing to mobile crowd sensing. In: Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), 2014 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 593--598). IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N Haderer, R Rouvoy and L Seinturier (2013). A preliminary investigation of user incentives to leverage crowdsensing activities. In: Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), 2013 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 199--204). IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- JD Hatton, TM Schmidt and J Jelen (2012). Adoption of Electronic Health Care Records: Physician Heuristics and Hesitancy. Procedia Technology, 5, 706--715.Google ScholarCross Ref
- X Hu, TH Chu, HC Chan and VC Leung (2013). Vita: A crowdsensing-oriented mobile cyber-physical system. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 1(1), 148--165.Google Scholar
- PP Jayaraman, C Perera, D Georgakopoulos and A Zaslavsky (2013). Efficient opportunistic sensing using mobile collaborative platform mosden. In: Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (COLLABORATECOM), 9th IEEE International Conference on (pp. 1--10). IEEE.Google Scholar
- LA Kalogiros, K Lagouvardos, S Nikoletseas, N Papadopoulos and P Tzamalis (2018). Allergymap: A Hybrid mHealth Mobile Crowdsensing System for Allergic Diseases Epidemiology: a multidisciplinary case study. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops) (pp. 597--602). IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- SS Kanhere (2011). Participatory sensing: Crowdsourcing data from mobile smartphones in urban spaces. In: Mobile Data Management (MDM), 2011 12th IEEE International Conference on (Vol. 2, pp. 3--6). IEEE. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B Kantarci, KG Carr and CD Pearsall (2016). SONATA: Social network assisted trustworthiness assurance in smart city crowdsensing. International Journal of Distributed Systems and Technologies (IJDST), 7(1), 59--78. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P Ketikidis, T Dimitrovski, L Lazuras and PA Bath (2012). Acceptance of health information technology in health professionals: An application of the revised technology acceptance model. Health informatics journal, 18(2), 124--134.Google Scholar
- S Khan, MN Tahir and A Raza (2013). Usability issues for smartphone users with special needs-Autism. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Open Source Systems and Technologies (pp. 107--113).Google ScholarCross Ref
- M Kirwan, C Vandelanotte, A Fenning and MJ Duncan (2013). Diabetes self-management smartphone application for adults with type 1 diabetes: randomized controlled trial. Journal of medical Internet research, 15(11), e235.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J Liu, H Cao, Q Li, F Cai, X Du and M Guizani (2018). A Large-scale Concurrent Data Anonymous Batch Verification Scheme for Mobile Healthcare Crowd Sensing. IEEE Internet of Things Journal.Google Scholar
- H Ma, D Zhao and P Yuan (2014). Opportunities in mobile crowd sensing. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(8), 29--35.Google Scholar
- M Mehdi, G Mühlmeier, K Agrawal, R Pryss, M Reichert and FJ Hauck (2018). Referenceable mobile crowdsensing architecture: A healthcare use case. Procedia computer science, 134, 445--451.Google Scholar
- RB Messaoud, Z Rejiba and Y Ghamri-Doudane (2016). An energy-aware end-to-end crowdsensing platform: Sensarena. In: IEEE Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), 13th Annual IEEE conference on (pp. 2). IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- ZA Mohammed and GP Tejay (2017). Examining privacy concerns and ecommerce adoption in developing countries: The impact of culture in shaping individuals' perceptions toward technology. Computers & Security, 67, 254--265. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M Parker, C Stofberg, R De la Harpe, L Venter and G Wills (2006). Data quality: How the flow of data influences data quality in a small to medium medical practice. In Proceedings of Community informatics for developing countries: Understanding and organising for a participatory future information society, Cape Town, South Africa.Google Scholar
- T Probst, R Pryss, B Langguth, M Spiliopoulou, M Landgrebe, M Vesala, S Harrison, J Schobel, M Reichert, M Stach and W Schlee (2017). Outpatient Tinnitus Clinic, Self-Help Web Platform, or Mobile Application to Recruit Tinnitus Study Samples? Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 9, 113--113.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R Pryss, T Probst, W Schlee, J Schobel, B Langguth, P Neff, M Spiliopoulou and M Reichert (2018a). Prospective crowdsensing versus retrospective ratings of tinnitus variability and tinnitus-stress associations based on the TrackYourTinnitus mobile platform. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 1--12.Google Scholar
- R Pryss, T Probst, W Schlee, J Schobel, B Langguth, P Neff, M Spiliopoulou and M Reichert (2017a,). Mobile crowdsensing for the juxtaposition of realtime assessments and retrospective reporting for neuropsychiatric symptoms. In: Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), 2017 IEEE 30th International Symposium on (pp. 642--647). IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R Pryss, M Reichert, J Herrmann, B Langguth and W Schlee (2015). Mobile Crowd Sensing in Clinical and Psychological Trials-- A Case Study. In: Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), 2015 IEEE 28th International Symposium on (pp. 23--24). IEEE. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R Pryss, M Reichert, W Schlee, M Spiliopoulou, B Langguth and T Probst (2018b). Differences between android and IOS users of the trackyourtinnitus mobile crowdsensing mhealth platform. In: 2018 IEEE 31st International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS) (pp. 411--416). IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R Pryss, W Schlee, B Langguth and M Reichert (2017b). Mobile crowdsensing services for tinnitus assessment and patient feedback. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on AI & Mobile Services (AIMS) (pp. 22--29). IEEE. Google ScholarDigital Library
- MR Ra, B Liu, TF La Porta and R Govindan (2012). Medusa: A programming framework for crowd-sensing applications. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services (pp. 337--350). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M Rabbi, S Ali, T Choudhury and E Berke (2011). Passive and in-situ assessment of mental and physical well-being using mobile sensors. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Ubiquitous computing (pp. 385--394). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M Raento, A Oulasvirta and N Eagle (2009). Smartphones: An emerging tool for social scientists. Sociological methods & research, 37(3), 426--454.Google Scholar
- S Reddy, A Parker, J Hyman, J Burke, D Estrin and M Hansen (2007). Image browsing, processing, and clustering for participatory sensing: lessons from a DietSense prototype. In: Proceedings of the 4th workshop on Embedded networked sensors (pp. 13--17). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M Schickler, R Pryss, M Reichert, M Heinzelmann, J Schobel, B Langguth, T Probst and W Schlee (2016). Using wearables in the context of chronic disorders: Results of a pre-study. In: 2016 IEEE 29th international symposium on computer-based medical systems (CBMS) (pp. 68--69). IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- SR Shrivastava, PS Shrivastava and J Ramasamy (2013). Role of self-care in management of diabetes mellitus. Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders, 12(1), 14--19.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G Tejay, G Dhillon and AG Chin (2005). Data Quality Dimensions for IS Security: A Theoretical Exposition. 1st IFIP Joint Working Conference on Security Management, Integrity, and Internal Control in Information Systems (pp 21--39). Fairfax, Virginia.Google Scholar
- H Tembine (2017). CrowdSensing games. In: Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), 29th Chinese on (pp. 4660--4665). IEEE.Google ScholarCross Ref
- TO Tokosi (2016). Electronic patient record system in South Africa: information storage, retrieval and share amongst clinicians. Unpublished Doctoral thesis: University of the Western Cape.Google Scholar
- BW vom Berg, T Gäbelein, J Knies and K Uphoff (2018). Target Group Based Mobility Chains in Health Care Systems. In Advances and New Trends in Environmental Informatics (pp. 133--145). Springer, Cham.Google Scholar
- A Winterlich, I Stevenson, A Waldren and T Dawson (2016). Diabetes Digital Coach: Developing an infrastructure for e-health self-management tools. In: Developments in eSystems Engineering (DeSE), 9th International Conference on (pp. 68--73). IEEE.Google Scholar
- H Xiong, Y Huang, LE Barnes and MS Gerber (2016). Sensus: a cross-platform, general-purpose system for mobile crowdsensing in human-subject studies. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 415--426). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- A Classification Framework of Mobile Health CrowdSensing Research: A Scoping Review
Recommendations
Mobile health: beyond consumer apps
MobileHCI '14: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices & servicesThe explosion of apps for the medical and wellness sectors has been noted by many. Consumer apps, which provide innovative solutions for self management for a range of health problems have flooded the market, due to high consumer demand. More recently ...
A Mobile Crowdsensing Framework for Integrating Smartphone and IoT Devices to Cloud Computing Services
MobiQuitous 2017: Proceedings of the 14th EAI International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and ServicesThe proliferations of mobile crowdsensing (MCS) services using smartphones with various embedded sensors have enabled people to involve in public sensing activities for various applications. Nevertheless for more complex applications such as smart ...
Adopting incentive mechanisms for large-scale participation in mobile crowdsensing: from literature review to a conceptual framework
Mobile crowdsensing is a burgeoning concept that allows smart cities to leverage the sensing power and ubiquitous nature of mobile devices in order to capture and map phenomena of common interest. At the core of any successful mobile crowdsensing ...
Comments