skip to main content
10.1145/3351108.3351113acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Classification Framework of Mobile Health CrowdSensing Research: A Scoping Review

Authors Info & Claims
Published:17 September 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mobile Health CrowdSensing (MHCS) is the use of sensor-based smart mobile devices to generate, collect, share and analyse real-time patient data from a population for improving health. The purpose of the paper is to report on a scoping review of research conducted on MHCS using a proposed classification framework. The framework has five categories of attributes (purpose; adoption and barriers; system attributes; software; and benefits and outcomes). Repositories searched were Medline/PubMed, Embase/Science Direct, PsycINFO, EBSCOHOST, IEEE, ACM Digital and accessible University library repositories from January 1998 to December 2018. Certain exclusion criteria were applied. 'Mobile crowd sensing' and 'mobile crowdsensing' keywords were separately used as search terms. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings revealed that MHCS applications in healthcare are scant. Most MHCS studies were from conference proceedings rather than traditional journals because of the fast-pace of technology-driven research. Healthcare research is costly and time-consuming thus there is a need to adopt MHCS as it can contribute towards low cost research due to the affordable devices used in generating, collecting and providing access to real-time data.

References

  1. MA Alsheikh, Y Jiao, D Niyato, P Wang, D Leong and Z Han (2017). The Accuracy-Privacy Trade-off of Mobile Crowdsensing. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(6), 132--139Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. N Archer, U Fevrier-Thomas, C Lokker, KA McKibbon and SE Straus (2011). Personal health records: a scoping review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18(4), 515--522.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. H Arksey and L O'Malley (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. R Armstrong, BJ Hall, J Doyle and E Waters (2011). 'Scoping the scope' of a Cochrane review. Journal of Public Health, 33(1), 147--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. CM Banda (2018). A Crowdsensing Method for Water Resource Monitoring in Smart Communities. Master thesis, Nelson Mandela University: South Africa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. P Bellavista, J De Benedetto, CR De Rolt, L Foschini and R Montanari (2017). LTE proximity discovery for supporting participatory mobile health communities. In Communications (ICC), 2017 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 1--6). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. D Ben-Zeev, SM Kaiser, CJ Brenner, M Begale, J Duffecy and DC Mohr (2013). Development and usability testing of FOCUS: A smartphone system for self-management of schizophrenia. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 36(4), 289--296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. G Cardone, A Corradi, L Foschini and R Ianniello (2016). Participact: A large-scale crowdsensing platform. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 4(1), 21--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S Chessa, A Corradi, L Foschini and M Girolami (2016). Empowering mobile crowdsensing through social and ad hoc networking. IEEE Communications Magazine, 54(7), 108--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. SK Datta, RPF Da Costa, RC Bonnet and J Härri (2016). oneM2M architecture based IoT framework for mobile crowd sensing in smart cities. In: Networks and Communications (EuCNC), 2016 European Conference on (pp. 168--173). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. ER Dorsey, J de Roulet, JP Thompson, JL Reminick, A Thai, Z White-Stellato, CA Beck, BP George and H Moses (2010). Funding of US biomedical research, 2003--2008. JAMA, 303(2), 137--143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. C Fiandrino, A Capponi, G Cacciatore, D Kliazovich, U Sorger, P Bouvry, B Kantarci, F Granelli and S Giordano (2017). CrowdSenSim: A simulation platform for mobile crowdsensing in realistic urban environments. IEEE Access, 5, 3490--3503.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. C Free, G Phillips, L Galli, L Watson, L Felix, P Edwards, V Patel and A Haines (2013). The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review. PLoS medicine, 10(1), e1001362.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. RK Ganti, F Ye and H Lei (2011). Mobile crowdsensing: current state and future challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(11), 32--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. C Gao, F Kong and J Tan (2009). Healthaware: Tackling obesity with health aware smart phone systems. In: Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), 2009 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 1549--1554). IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. E Giannotta (2017). Conception and Realization of a Mobile Crowdsensing Application for Support and Empowerment of Diabetes Patients. Unpublished Master thesis: Ulm University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. B Guo, Z Yu, X Zhou and D Zhang (2014). From participatory sensing to mobile crowd sensing. In: Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), 2014 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 593--598). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. N Haderer, R Rouvoy and L Seinturier (2013). A preliminary investigation of user incentives to leverage crowdsensing activities. In: Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), 2013 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 199--204). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. JD Hatton, TM Schmidt and J Jelen (2012). Adoption of Electronic Health Care Records: Physician Heuristics and Hesitancy. Procedia Technology, 5, 706--715.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. X Hu, TH Chu, HC Chan and VC Leung (2013). Vita: A crowdsensing-oriented mobile cyber-physical system. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 1(1), 148--165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. PP Jayaraman, C Perera, D Georgakopoulos and A Zaslavsky (2013). Efficient opportunistic sensing using mobile collaborative platform mosden. In: Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (COLLABORATECOM), 9th IEEE International Conference on (pp. 1--10). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. LA Kalogiros, K Lagouvardos, S Nikoletseas, N Papadopoulos and P Tzamalis (2018). Allergymap: A Hybrid mHealth Mobile Crowdsensing System for Allergic Diseases Epidemiology: a multidisciplinary case study. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops) (pp. 597--602). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. SS Kanhere (2011). Participatory sensing: Crowdsourcing data from mobile smartphones in urban spaces. In: Mobile Data Management (MDM), 2011 12th IEEE International Conference on (Vol. 2, pp. 3--6). IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. B Kantarci, KG Carr and CD Pearsall (2016). SONATA: Social network assisted trustworthiness assurance in smart city crowdsensing. International Journal of Distributed Systems and Technologies (IJDST), 7(1), 59--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. P Ketikidis, T Dimitrovski, L Lazuras and PA Bath (2012). Acceptance of health information technology in health professionals: An application of the revised technology acceptance model. Health informatics journal, 18(2), 124--134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. S Khan, MN Tahir and A Raza (2013). Usability issues for smartphone users with special needs-Autism. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Open Source Systems and Technologies (pp. 107--113).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. M Kirwan, C Vandelanotte, A Fenning and MJ Duncan (2013). Diabetes self-management smartphone application for adults with type 1 diabetes: randomized controlled trial. Journal of medical Internet research, 15(11), e235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. J Liu, H Cao, Q Li, F Cai, X Du and M Guizani (2018). A Large-scale Concurrent Data Anonymous Batch Verification Scheme for Mobile Healthcare Crowd Sensing. IEEE Internet of Things Journal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. H Ma, D Zhao and P Yuan (2014). Opportunities in mobile crowd sensing. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(8), 29--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. M Mehdi, G Mühlmeier, K Agrawal, R Pryss, M Reichert and FJ Hauck (2018). Referenceable mobile crowdsensing architecture: A healthcare use case. Procedia computer science, 134, 445--451.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. RB Messaoud, Z Rejiba and Y Ghamri-Doudane (2016). An energy-aware end-to-end crowdsensing platform: Sensarena. In: IEEE Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), 13th Annual IEEE conference on (pp. 2). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. ZA Mohammed and GP Tejay (2017). Examining privacy concerns and ecommerce adoption in developing countries: The impact of culture in shaping individuals' perceptions toward technology. Computers & Security, 67, 254--265. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. M Parker, C Stofberg, R De la Harpe, L Venter and G Wills (2006). Data quality: How the flow of data influences data quality in a small to medium medical practice. In Proceedings of Community informatics for developing countries: Understanding and organising for a participatory future information society, Cape Town, South Africa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. T Probst, R Pryss, B Langguth, M Spiliopoulou, M Landgrebe, M Vesala, S Harrison, J Schobel, M Reichert, M Stach and W Schlee (2017). Outpatient Tinnitus Clinic, Self-Help Web Platform, or Mobile Application to Recruit Tinnitus Study Samples? Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 9, 113--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. R Pryss, T Probst, W Schlee, J Schobel, B Langguth, P Neff, M Spiliopoulou and M Reichert (2018a). Prospective crowdsensing versus retrospective ratings of tinnitus variability and tinnitus-stress associations based on the TrackYourTinnitus mobile platform. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. R Pryss, T Probst, W Schlee, J Schobel, B Langguth, P Neff, M Spiliopoulou and M Reichert (2017a,). Mobile crowdsensing for the juxtaposition of realtime assessments and retrospective reporting for neuropsychiatric symptoms. In: Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), 2017 IEEE 30th International Symposium on (pp. 642--647). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. R Pryss, M Reichert, J Herrmann, B Langguth and W Schlee (2015). Mobile Crowd Sensing in Clinical and Psychological Trials-- A Case Study. In: Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), 2015 IEEE 28th International Symposium on (pp. 23--24). IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. R Pryss, M Reichert, W Schlee, M Spiliopoulou, B Langguth and T Probst (2018b). Differences between android and IOS users of the trackyourtinnitus mobile crowdsensing mhealth platform. In: 2018 IEEE 31st International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS) (pp. 411--416). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. R Pryss, W Schlee, B Langguth and M Reichert (2017b). Mobile crowdsensing services for tinnitus assessment and patient feedback. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on AI & Mobile Services (AIMS) (pp. 22--29). IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. MR Ra, B Liu, TF La Porta and R Govindan (2012). Medusa: A programming framework for crowd-sensing applications. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services (pp. 337--350). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. M Rabbi, S Ali, T Choudhury and E Berke (2011). Passive and in-situ assessment of mental and physical well-being using mobile sensors. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Ubiquitous computing (pp. 385--394). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. M Raento, A Oulasvirta and N Eagle (2009). Smartphones: An emerging tool for social scientists. Sociological methods & research, 37(3), 426--454.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. S Reddy, A Parker, J Hyman, J Burke, D Estrin and M Hansen (2007). Image browsing, processing, and clustering for participatory sensing: lessons from a DietSense prototype. In: Proceedings of the 4th workshop on Embedded networked sensors (pp. 13--17). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. M Schickler, R Pryss, M Reichert, M Heinzelmann, J Schobel, B Langguth, T Probst and W Schlee (2016). Using wearables in the context of chronic disorders: Results of a pre-study. In: 2016 IEEE 29th international symposium on computer-based medical systems (CBMS) (pp. 68--69). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. SR Shrivastava, PS Shrivastava and J Ramasamy (2013). Role of self-care in management of diabetes mellitus. Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders, 12(1), 14--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. G Tejay, G Dhillon and AG Chin (2005). Data Quality Dimensions for IS Security: A Theoretical Exposition. 1st IFIP Joint Working Conference on Security Management, Integrity, and Internal Control in Information Systems (pp 21--39). Fairfax, Virginia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. H Tembine (2017). CrowdSensing games. In: Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), 29th Chinese on (pp. 4660--4665). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. TO Tokosi (2016). Electronic patient record system in South Africa: information storage, retrieval and share amongst clinicians. Unpublished Doctoral thesis: University of the Western Cape.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. BW vom Berg, T Gäbelein, J Knies and K Uphoff (2018). Target Group Based Mobility Chains in Health Care Systems. In Advances and New Trends in Environmental Informatics (pp. 133--145). Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. A Winterlich, I Stevenson, A Waldren and T Dawson (2016). Diabetes Digital Coach: Developing an infrastructure for e-health self-management tools. In: Developments in eSystems Engineering (DeSE), 9th International Conference on (pp. 68--73). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. H Xiong, Y Huang, LE Barnes and MS Gerber (2016). Sensus: a cross-platform, general-purpose system for mobile crowdsensing in human-subject studies. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 415--426). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Classification Framework of Mobile Health CrowdSensing Research: A Scoping Review

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SAICSIT '19: Proceedings of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists 2019
      September 2019
      352 pages
      ISBN:9781450372657
      DOI:10.1145/3351108

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 September 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate187of439submissions,43%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader