skip to main content
10.1145/3351108.3351122acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

From Digital Business Strategy to Digital Transformation - How: A Systematic Literature Review

Authors Info & Claims
Published:17 September 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Digital transformation is a top priority in most organizations. It is a complex task that tackles the changes digital technologies can bring about in organisations. As such, it requires clarity of purpose, which can be achieved through having a firm digital business strategy. However, few studies explain how the two processes of digital business strategizing and digital transformation interrelate. The aim of this study is to identify the core concepts that link digital business strategy to digital transformation so as to improve understanding of their dynamic interaction and outcomes. Through a systematic literature review, it was shown that the fundamental concepts in the domain of study are digital technologies, digital business strategy, digital transformation strategy, digital transformation, digital leadership, business models, digital innovation, digital transparency and digital maturity. The key link between digital business strategy and digital transformation is a digital transformation strategy. A model is developed which shows the interrelationship of all these concepts.

References

  1. Karpovsky, A. and Galliers, R. D. 2015. Aligning in Practice: From Current Cases to a New Agenda. Journal of Information Technology 30, 2 (2015), 136--160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Chen, D.Q., Mocker, M., Preston, D.S. and Teubner, A. 2010. Information systems strategy: reconceptualization, measurement, and implications. MIS Quarterly 34, 2 (2010), 233--238. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Gudergan., G and Mugge, P. 2017. The gap between practice and theory of digital transformation. in Proceeding Hawaii International Conference of System Sciences (2017), Hawaii, 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O.A., Pavlou, P.A. and Venkatraman, N. 2013.Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly 37, 2 (2013), 471--482. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Mithas, S. and Lucas Jr, H.C. 2010. What is Your Digital Business Strategy? IT Professional 12, 6 (2010), 4--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Matt, C., Hess, T. and Benlian, A. 2015. Digital Transformation Strategies Business & Information Systems Engineering 57, 5 (2015), 339--343.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Horlacher, A. and Hess, T. 2016. What does a chief digital officer do? Managerial tasks and roles of a new C-level position in the context of digital transformation. in Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2016), Hawaii, 5126--5135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mithas, S., Tafti, A. and Mitchell, W. 2013. How a Firm's Competitive Environment and Digital Strategic Posture Influence Digital Business Strategy. MIS Quarterly 37, 2 (2013), 511--536. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hess, T., Matt, C., Benlian, A. and Wiesböck, F. 2015. Options for Formulating a Digital Transformation Strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive 15, 2 (2015), 123--139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kane, G.C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A.N., Kiron, D. and Buckley, N. 2016. Aligning the organization for its digital future. MIT Sloan Management Review 57, 4 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Malar, D.A., Arvidsson, V. and Holmstrom, J. 2019. Digital Transformation in Banking: Exploring Value Co-Creation in Online Banking Services in India. Journal of Global Information Technology Management 22, 1 (2019), 7--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Singh, A. and Hess, T. 2017. How Chief Digital Officers Promote the Digital Transformation of their Companies. MIS Quarterly Executive 16, 1 (2017), 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Fink, A. 2014. Conducting Research Literature Reviews. London: SageGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Rowe, F. 2014. What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations. European Journal of Information Systems 23, 3 (2014), 241--255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Webster, J. and Watson, R. 2002. Guest Editorial: Analysing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly 26, 2 (2002), 13--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Templier, M. and Paré, G. 2015. A Framework for Guiding and Evaluating Literature Reviews. in Communications of the Association for Information Systems 37, 6 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Paré, G., Johnstone, D. and Kitsiou, S. 2016. Contextualizing the twin concepts of systematicity and transparency in information systems literature reviews. European Journal of Information Systems 25 (2016), 493--508.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Bandara, W., Furtmueller, E., Gorbacheva, E, Miskon, S. and Beekhuyzen, J. 2015. Achieving Rigor in Literature Reviews: Insights from Qualitative Data Analysis and Tool-Support. in Communications of the Association for Information Systems 39, 1 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Okoli, C. and Schabram, K. 2010. A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research,Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems 10, 26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Schryen, G. 2015. Writing Qualitative IS Literature Reviews---Guidelines for Synthesis, Interpretation, and Guidance of Research. in Communications of the Association for Information Systems 37, 12 (2015), 286--325.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Lowry, B., Moody, D., Gaskin, J., Galletta, F., Humpherys, L., Barlow, B. and Wilson, W. 2013. Evaluating Journal Quality and the Association for Information Systems Senior Scholars' Journal Basket via Bibliometric Measures: Do Expert Journal Assessments Add Value? MIS Quarterly 37, 4 (2013), 993--1012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Wolfswinkel, J., Furtmueller, E. and Wilderom, C. 2013. Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature. European Journal of Information Systems advance 22, 1 (2013), 45--55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Mikalef, P., Pappas, O., Krogstie, J. and Giannakos, M. 2018. Big data analytics capabilities: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Information Systems and e-Business Management 16, 3 (2018), 547--578. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Günther, W. A., Mehrizi, M. H. R., Huysman, M. and Feldberg, F. (2017). Debating big data: A literature review on realizing value from big data. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 26, 3 (2017), 191--209. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Geeling, S., Brown, I. and Weimann, P. Processes of Relating: Cultural Implications in Information Systems Development. in ICIS 2017 Proceedings, AIS (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Braun, V., Clarke, V. and Rance, N. 2015. How to use Thematic Analysis with Interview Data. in The Counselling and Psychotherapy Research Handbook, Andreas Vossler and Naomi Moller (Eds.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 183--197.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O. and Lyytinen, K. 2010. The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research 21, 4 (2010), 724--735. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Grover, V. and Kohli, R. 2013. Revealing Your Hand: Caveats in Implementing Digital Business Strategy. MIS Quarterly 37, 2 (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Fitzgerald, M., Kruschwitz, N., Bonnet, D. and Welch, M. 2013. Embracing Digital Technology: A New Strategic Imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review (2013), 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Chan, Y.E. and Reich, B.H. 2007. IT alignment: what have we learned? Journal of Information Technology 22, 4 (2007), 297--315.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Coltman, T., Tallon, P., Sharma, R. and Queiroz, M. 2015. Strategic IT alignment: Twenty-five years on. Journal of Information Technology 30, 2 (2015), 91--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Mithas, S., Agarwal, R. and Courtney, H. 2012. Digital Business Strategies and the Duality of IT. IT Professional 5 (2012), 2--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Sebastian, I.M., Ross, J.W., Beath, C., Mocker, M., Moloney, K.G. and Fonstad, N.O. 2017. How big old companies navigate digital transformation. MIS Quarterly Executive 16, 3 (2017), 197--213.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Woodard, C.J., Ramasubbu, N., Tschang, F.T. and Sambamurthy, V. 2013. Design Capital and Design Moves: The Logic of Digital Business Strategy. MIS Quarterly 37, 2 (2013), 537--564. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Drnevich, P.L. and Croson, D.C. 2013. Information Technology and Business-Level Strategy: Toward an Integrated Theoretical Perspective. MIS Quarterly 37, 2 (2013), 483--509. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Ross, J.W., Sebastian, I.M. and Beath, C.M. 2017. How to Develop a Great Digital Strategy. MIT Sloan Management Review 58, 2 (Winter 2017). Reprint #58204 http://mitsmr.com/2fAqNTkGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Kane, G.C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A.N., Kiron, D. and Buckley, N. 2017. Achieving Digital Maturity. MIT Sloan Management Review (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Westerman, G., Bonnet, D. and McAfee, A. 2015. Leading Digital: Turning Technology into Business Transformation. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Berman, S. 2015. Digital Transformation: Opportunities to Create New Business Models. Strategy & Leadership 40, 2 (2015), 16--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Arvidsson, V. and Holmström, J. 2018. Digitalization as a strategy practice: What is there to learn from strategy as practice research? in The routledge companion to management information systems, R. D. Galliers and M.-K. Stein (Eds.). London, UK: Routledge, 218--231.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Kane, G.C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A.N., Kiron, D. and Buckley, N. 2015. Strategy, Not Technology, Drives Digital Transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press (July 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Westerman, G.2018. Your Company Doesn't Need a Digital Strategy. MIT Sloan Management Review 59, 3 (2018), 14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Sia, S.K., Soh, C. and Weill, P. 2016. How DBS Bank Pursued a Digital Business Strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive 15, 2 (2016), 105--121.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Bennis, W. 2013. Leadership in a Digital World: Embracing Transparency and Adaptive Capacity. MIS Quarterly 37, 2 (2013), 3--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Chanias, S., Myers, M.D. and Hess, T. 2018. Digital transformation strategy making in pre-digital organizations:The case of a financial services. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 28, 1 (2018), 17--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Granados, N. F., Gupta, A. and Kauffman, R. J. 2010. Information Transparency in Business-to-Consumer Markets: Concepts, Framework, and Research Agenda. Journal of Information Systems Research 21, 2 (2010), 207--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Osterwalder, A. and Pigneur, Y. 2010. Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Keen, P. and Williams, R. 2015. Value Architectures for Digital Business: Beyond the Business Model. MIS Quarterly 37, 2 (2015), 643--647. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Barrett, M., Davidson, E., Prabhu, J. and Vargo, S.L. 2015.Service Innovation in the Digital Age: Key contributions and future directions. MIS Quarterly 39,1 (2015), 135--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A. and Song, M. 2015. Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World. MIS Quarterly 41, 1 (2015), 223--238. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Lusch, R. F. and Nambisan, S. 2015. Service innovation: A service-dominant perspective. MIS Quarterly 39, 1 (2015), 155--175. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Yoo, Y., Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K. and Majchrzak, A. 2012. Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World. Organization Science 23, 5 (2012), 1398--1408. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Zittrain, J. L. 2006. The generative Internet. Harvard Law Review 119, 7 (2006), 1974- 2040.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Granados, N. and Gupta, A. 2013. Transparency Strategy: Competing with Information in a Digital World. MIS Quarterly 37, 2 (2013), 637--641. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. New, S. 2010. The Transparent Supply Chain. Harvard Business Review, (2010), 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Markus, M.L. and Loebbecke, C. 2013. Commoditized Digital Processes and Business Community Platforms: New Opportunities and Challenges for Digital Business Strategies. MIS Quarterly 37, 2 (2013), 649--653. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. neulandGmbH. (2014). DT-Award. DOI: http://www.dt-award.de/2014/wpcontent/uploads/2014/09/DT-Report-2014.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Schumacher, A., Erol, S. and Sihn, W. 2016. A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Procedia CIRP 52, (2016), 161--166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Kubrick, K. 2013. Introducing the dStrategy Digital Maturity Model. DOI:http://www.digitalstrategyconference.com/blog/digital-strategy/introducing-dstrategy-digital-maturity-model/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K. and Sørensen, C. 2010. Research Commentary-Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda. Information Systems Research 21, 4 (2010), 748--759. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Porter, M.E. 2001. Strategy and the Internet. Harvard Business Review 79, 3 (2001), 62--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. From Digital Business Strategy to Digital Transformation - How: A Systematic Literature Review

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SAICSIT '19: Proceedings of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists 2019
      September 2019
      352 pages
      ISBN:9781450372657
      DOI:10.1145/3351108

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 September 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate187of439submissions,43%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader