Ichiro Umata
ABSTRACT
Mutual visual attention between the current and next speaker were analyzed from the viewpoints of grounding in communication and linguistic proficiency. Each utterance was categorized according to the grounding acts in the dialogue [21], and the gazing activities of the current and next speakers were compared between native (L1) and second language (L2) conversations. A correlation analysis showed that mutual visual attention was less prominent in utterances that ground the previous utterances without adding new information in L2, but not necessarily so in L1 conversations.
- Michael Argyle and Mark Cook. 1976. Gaze and mutual gaze. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Argyle, M., Lallijee, M. & Cook, M. (1968). The effects of visibility on interaction in a dyad, Human relations, 21, pp. 3-17.Google Scholar
- Auer, P. (2017). Gaze, addressee selection and turn-taking in three-party interaction. In: InLiSt - Interaction and Linguistic Structures, No. 60.Google Scholar
- Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Clark, H. H. & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication, In Resnik, L. B., Levine, J. M., & Teasley, S. D. (Eds.) Perspectives on socially shared cognition, (pp.127-149), Washington, DC: APA Books.Google Scholar
- Clark H. H., & Krych, M. A. (2004). Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding, Journal of memory and language, 50, 62-81.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Duncan, S. (1972). Some Signals and Rules for Taking Speaking Turns in Conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 23, pp. 283–292.Google ScholarCross Ref
- ELAN. http://www.lat-mpi.eu/tools/elanGoogle Scholar
- Holler, J., & Kendrick, K. H. (2015). Unaddressed participants’ gaze in multi-person interaction: optimizing recipiency. Frontiers in psychology 6, 98.Google Scholar
- Ijuin, K., Horiuchi, Y., Umata, I., & Yamamoto, S. (2015) Eye gaze analyses in L1 and L2 conversations: difference in interaction structures, Král, P., & [11]Matouŝec, V. (Eds.) Proc. of TSD 2015, pp. 114-121, LNAI 9302.Google Scholar
- Ijuin, K., Umata, I., Kato, T., & Yamamoto, S. (2018). Difference in eye gaze for floor apportionment in native- and second-language conversations. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 42, pp. 113–128.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ishii, R., Otsuka, K., Kumano, S., Matsuda, M., & Yamato, J. (2013). Predicting next speaker and timing from gaze transition patterns in multi-party meetings. Proc. of ICMI '13, pp. 79-86.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ishii, R., Otsuka, K., Kumano, S., & Yamato, J. (2016). Prediction of Who Will Be the Next Speaker and When Using Gaze Behavior in Multiparty Meetings. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 6, 1, 4.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jokinen, K., Furukawa, H., Nishida, M., & Yamamoto, S. (2013). Gaze and turn-taking behavior in casual conversational interactions. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 3, 2, 12.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kendon, A. (1967). Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction, Acta Psychologica, 26, 22-63.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kendrick, K. H. & Holler, J. (2017). Gaze direction signals response preference in conversation. Research on Lan. and Soc. Interaction 50, 12–32.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kleinke, C. L. (1986). Gaze and eye contact: a research review, Psychological Bulletin, 100, 78-100.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rossano, F. (2013). Gaze in conversation. The handbook of conversation analysis. Stivers, T. Sidnell, J. (Ed.). Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp. 308–329.Google Scholar
- Rossano, F., Brown, P., & Levinson., S. C. (2009). Gaze, questioning, and culture. J. Sidnell (Ed.) Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives, [21]Cambridge University Press, pp. 187–249.Google Scholar
- Stivers, T. & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language & Social Interaction 43, 3–31.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Traum, D. (1994). A computational theory of grounding in natural language conversation. PhD thesis, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
- Umata, I., Yamamoto, S., Ijuin, K. & Nishida, M. (2013). Effects of language proficiency on eye-gaze in second language conversations: toward supporting second language collaboration, Proc. of ICMI2013, pp. 413-419.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Umata, I., Ijuin, K., Kato, T., and & Yamamoto, S. (2018). Floor Apportionment and Mutual Gazes in Native and Second-Language Conversation. Proc. of ICMI '18, pp. 334-341.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yamamoto, S., Taguchi, K., Ijuin, K., Umata, I., & Nishida, M. (2015). Multimodal corpus of multiparty conversations in L1 and L2 languages and findings obtained from it, LRE Journal, 49, 857-882.Google Scholar
- Floor Apportionment Function of Speaker's Gaze in Grounding Acts
Recommendations
Floor Apportionment and Mutual Gazes in Native and Second-Language Conversation
ICMI '18: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal InteractionQuantitative analysis of gazes between a speaker and listeners was conducted from the viewpoint of mutual activities in floor apportionment, with the assumption that mutual gaze plays an important role in coordinating speech interaction. We conducted ...
Effects of language proficiency on eye-gaze in second language conversations: toward supporting second language collaboration
ICMI '13: Proceedings of the 15th ACM on International conference on multimodal interactionThe importance of conversation in second languages during international collaboration continues to increase, as does the risk of miscommunication caused by the differences in the linguistic proficiency of participants. This study provides a basis for ...
Looking for Laughs: Gaze Interaction with Laughter Pragmatics and Coordination
ICMI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Multimodal InteractionLaughter and gaze have an important role in managing and coordi-nating social interactions. In the current work, using a multimodal corpus of dyadic taste-testing interactions, we explore whether laughs performing different pragmatic functions are ...
Comments