skip to main content
10.1145/3351556.3351571acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Female Students' Attitude Towards Studying Informatics and Expectations for Future Career - Balkan Case

Published:26 September 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents the results of research on female students at three different faculties of informatics: Novi Sad in Serbia, Plovdiv in Bulgaria and Tirana in Albania. The idea of this paper is to analyze and compare female students' attitudes towards studying informatics (Computer Science - CS or Information Communication Technologies -- ICT and their expectations for future career. Therefore, we have collected female students' opinions, experiences, attitudes, and perspectives, on current studies, employment opportunities and expectations of future professional careers. Reliable statistical tests were used for a detailed analysis of student responses. The obtained results indicate that the opinions of female students vary, depending on the place where they study.

References

  1. Savic M, Ivanovic M, Radovanovic M, Dimic Surla B: (2018), Gender-Based Analysis of Intra-Institutional Research Productivity and Collaboration.Fundam. Inform. 162(4): 237--258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Putnik Z, Stajner-Papuga I, Ivanovic M, Budimac Z, Zdravkova K: (2017), Gender-related correlations of computer science students. Computers in Human Behavior 69: 91--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cole JR., 1979, Fair Science: Women in the Scientific Community. The Free Press, New York, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kovieriene, A., (2010), The link between technical knowledge of the youth and their technical abilities: The role of gender. Informatics in Education 9 (1), 81--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Cohoon, J.M., (2002), Recruiting and retaining women in undergraduate computing majors. SIGCSE Bulletin 34 (2), 48--52 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Beyer, S., K.Rynes, J.Perrault, K.Hay, and S.Haller. 2003. Gender Differences in Computer Science Students. SIGCSE Bulletin. pp. 49--53. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gander JP. (1999), Faculty gender effects on academic research and teaching. Research in Higher Education, 40(2):171--184Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kafai Y.B: Proceedings of the Third Conference on GenderIT, GenderIT 2015, Philadelphia, PA, USA, April 24, 2015. ACM 2015, ISBN 978-1-4503-3596-6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Marsden N, Wulf V, Rode J.A, Weibert A:Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender & IT, GenderIT (2018), Heilbronn, Germany, May 14-15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Kobayashi K, Toda T, Nakamura S: (2007), Intra-gender statistical singing voice conversion with direct waveform modification using log-spectral differential. Speech Communication 99: 211--220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Abramo G, D'Angelo CA, Murgia G. Gender differences in research collaboration. Journal of Informetrics, (2013), 7(4):811--822.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Konig CJ, Fell CB, Kellnhofer L, Schui G. Are there gender differences among researchers from industrial/organizational psychology? Scientometrics, (2015). 105(3):1931--1952.2014. 98(1):703--723. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Abramo G, D'Angelo CA, Caprasecca A. Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system. Scientometrics, (2009). 79(3):517--539.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Fong, C. J., Yoo, J. H., Jones, S. J., Torres, L. G., & Decker, M. L., (2009).Trends in female authorships, editorial board memberships, and editorships in educational psychology journals from 2003 to 2008. Educational Psychology Review, 21(3), 267--277Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. https://www.ibm.com/analytics/spss-statistics-softwareGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. van Arensbergen P, van der Weijden I, van den Besselaar P. Gender differences in scientific productivity: A persisting phenomenon? Scientometrics, (2012). 93(3):857--868.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sotudeh H, Khoshian N. Gender differences in science: The case of scientific productivity in Nano Science & Technology during 2005-2007. Scientometrics, 2014. 98(1):457--472. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Female Students' Attitude Towards Studying Informatics and Expectations for Future Career - Balkan Case

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        BCI'19: Proceedings of the 9th Balkan Conference on Informatics
        September 2019
        225 pages

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 September 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        BCI'19 Paper Acceptance Rate24of73submissions,33%Overall Acceptance Rate97of250submissions,39%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader