skip to main content
10.1145/3351995.3352044acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschitalyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

NutritionAvatar: designing a future-self avatar for promotion of balanced, low-sodium diet intention: framework design and user study

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 September 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Excessive salt intake is increasingly seen as global health threat. As contemporary education campaigns and current mHealth solutions only reach health literate users, an often unaffected minority, there exists demand for more inclusive solutions. Avatar-based health interventions have been shown effective in such a context, but have not been tested for promoting low-sodium dieting specifically. Therefore, we designed, implemented and tested a novel smartphone-mediated and future-self avatar-based sodium reduction intervention (N = 28). Because most consumers remain unaware of the relationship between sodium intake and high blood pressure, the system was also tailored to support users in gaining risk awareness and intention for low-sodium dieting. Results indicate that participants significantly increase outcome expectancy, risk awareness and intention towards balanced, low-sodium dieting. The majority of users identify themselves with the future-self avatar and confirm the system's usefulness, ease of use, enjoyment.

References

  1. Ahn, S.J. et al. 2014. Using virtual doppelgängers to increase personal relevance of health risk communication. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (2014), 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahn, S.J. (Grace) et al. 2015. Using Virtual Pets to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in Children: A Technology-Assisted Social Cognitive Theory Approach. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 19, 2 (2015), cyber.2015.0224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Beer-Borst, S. et al. 2015. Measuring the effectiveness of salt intake intervention . Can a sodium and potassium specific Food Record Checklist complement or replace 24-hour and spot-urine collections? ICDAM9 2015 (poster) (2015), 3012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Behm-Morawitz, E. 2013. Mirrored selves: The influence of self-presence in a virtual world on health, appearance, and well-being. Computers in Human Behavior. 29, 1 (2013), 119--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Belim, V. et al. 2014. Beyond gamification: sociometric technologies that encourage reflection before behavior change. Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology - ACE '14. November 2014 (2014), 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bentley, B. 2006. A review of methods to measure dietary sodium intake. The Journal of cardiovascular nursing. 21, 1 (2006), 63--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bickmore, T. et al. 2005. Establishing the computer-patient working alliance in automated health behavior change interventions. Patient Education and Counseling. 59, 1 (2005), 21--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Bickmore, T.W. et al. 2013. Automated interventions for multiple health behaviors using conversational agents. Patient Education and Counseling. 92, 2 (2013), 142--148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Birk, M. V. et al. 2016. Fostering Intrinsic Motivation through Avatar Identification in Digital Games. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16 (2016), 2982--2995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Blackburne, T. et al. 2016. A Serious Game to Increase Healthy Food Consumption in Overweight or Obese Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Serious Games. 4, 2 (2016), e10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Bobowski, N. et al. 2015. A longitudinal comparison of two salt reduction strategies: Acceptability of a low sodium food depends on the consumer. Food Quality and Preference. 40, PB (Mar. 2015), 270--278.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, I.J. et al. 2013. Estimating 24-hour urinary sodium excretion from casual urinary sodium concentrations in western populations. American Journal of Epidemiology. 177, 11 (2013), 1180--1192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Carrasco, R. 2017. Designing Virtual Avatars to Empower Social Participation among Older Adults. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA '17. (2017), 259--262. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Carter, M.C. et al. 2013. Development of "My Meal Mate" - A smartphone intervention for weight loss. Nutrition Bulletin. 38, (2013), 80--84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. ChanLin, L.-J. et al. 2003. Web-based instruction in learning nutrition. Journal of Instructional Psychology. 30, 1 (2003), 12--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Chappuis, A. et al. 2011. Studie zum Salzkonsum der Schweizer Bevölkerung. Service de Néphrologie et Institut Universitaire de Médecine Sociale et Préventive Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland. (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Chappuis, A. et al. 2011. Swiss Survey on Salt Intake: Main Results. Service de N'ephrologie et Institut Universitaire de M'edecine Sociale et Pr'eventive Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Suisse. (2011), 1--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Cheong, C. et al. 2013. Quick Quiz: A Gamified Approach for Enhancing Learning. PACIS 2013 Proceedings. (2013), 1--14. DOI:https://doi.org/pacis2013/206.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Cobb, L.K. et al. 2012. Strategies to reduce dietary sodium intake. Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Connolly, T.M. et al. 2012. A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education. 59, 2 (2012), 661--686. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Day, N.E. et al. 2001. Epidemiological assessment of diet: a comparison of a 7-day diary with a food frequency questionnaire using urinary markers of nitrogen, potassium and sodium. International journal of epidemiology. 30, 2 (2001), 309--317.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Dötsch-Klerk, M. et al. 2015. Reducing salt in food; setting product-specific criteria aiming at a salt intake of 5g per day. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 69, 10 (2015), 799--804.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Eyles, H. et al. 2014. Using mobile technology to support lower-salt food choices for people with cardiovascular disease: Protocol for the SaltSwitch randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 14, 1 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Fogg, B.J. 2003. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change what We Think and Do. CHI 2003 Tutorial. (2003), 283.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Fox, J. et al. 2009. Virtual Experiences, Physical Behaviors: The Effect of Presence on Imitation of an Eating Avatar. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 18, 4 (2009), 294--303. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Fox, J. and Bailenson, J.N. 2010. The Use of Doppelgängers to promote health behavior changes. CyberTherapy & Rehabilitation. 3, 2 (2010), 16--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Fuchs, K.L. et al. 2016. Swiss FoodQuiz: Inducing Nutritional Knowledge via a Visual Learning based Serious Game. ECIS 2016 Proceedings (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Godinho, C.A. et al. 2013. Formative research on HAPA model determinants for fruit and vegetable intake: Target beliefs for audiences at different stages of change. Health Education Research. 28, 6 (2013), 1014--1028.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Gregor, S. and Hevner, A.R. 2013. Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact. MIS Quarterly. 37, 2 (2013), 337--355. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Gunn, J.P. et al. 2013. Sodium reduction is a public health priority: Reflections on the institute of medicine's report, sodium intake in populations: Assessment of evidence. American Journal of Hypertension.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Hajjar, I. and Kotchen, T.A. 2003. Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988--2000. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association. 290, 2 (2003), 199--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Hamari, J. and Koivisto, J. 2013. Social motivations to use gamification: an empirical study of gamifying exercise. Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems SOCIAL. JUNE (2013), 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. van der Heijden, H. 2004. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly. 28, 4 (2004), 695--704. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Hekler, E.B. et al. 2011. A case study of BSUED: Behavioral Science-informed User Experience Design. Proceedings of CHI, Vancouver, Canada. (2011), 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Hekler, E.B. et al. 2011. A case study of BSUED : Behavioral Science-informed User Experience Design. Proc. CHI 2011 (Vancouver, Canada, 2011), 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Hekler, E.B. et al. 2013. Mind the Theoretical Gap: Interpreting, Using, and Developing Behavioral Theory in HCI Research. Proc. CHI 2013. (2013), 3307--3316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Hekler, E.B. et al. 2013. Mind the Theoretical Gap: Interpreting, Using, and Developing Behavioral Theory in HCI Research. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '13 (2013), 3307--3316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Henney, J.E. et al. 2010. Strategies to Reduce Sodium Intake in the United States.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Hershfield, H.E. et al. 2011. Increasing saving behavior through age-progressed renderings of the future self. Journal of Marketing Research. 48, SPL (2011), S23--S37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Hershfield, H.E. et al. 2011. Increasing Saving Behavior Through Age-Progressed Renderings of the Future Self. Journal of Marketing Research. 48, SPL (Nov. 2011), 23--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Hswen, Y. et al. 2013. Virtual avatars, gaming, and social media: Designing a mobile health app to help children choose healthier food options. Journal of Mobile Technology in Medicine. 2, 2 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Hyde, J. et al. 2015. Using an Interactive Avatar's Facial Expressiveness to Increase Persuasiveness and Socialness. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15 (2015), 1719--1728. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Jiwa, M. et al. 2015. Preliminary findings of how visual demonstrations of changes to physical appearance may enhance weight loss attempts. European Journal of Public Health. 25, 2 (2015), 283--285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Jiwa, M. et al. 2015. Preliminary findings of how visual demonstrations of changes to physical appearance may enhance weight loss attempts. European Journal of Public Health. 25, 2 (2015), 283--285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Kim, Y. and Sundar, S.S. 2012. Visualizing ideal self vs. actual self through avatars: Impact on preventive health outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior. 28, 4 (2012), 1356--1364. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Klenow, S. et al. 2016. Sodium intake in Germany estimated from sodium excretion measured in spot urine samples. BMC Nutrition. 2, 1 (2016), 36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Kramer, J. and Kowatsch, T. 2017. Using Feedback to Promote Physical Activity: The Role of the Feedback Sign. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 19, 6 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Kriglstein, S. and Wallner, G. 2013. A Study on the Use of Adaptive Avatars for Player Lists in Games for Children. International Conference on Making Sense of Converging Media (2013), 254--257. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Kushner, R.F. 1995. Barriers to providing nutrition counseling by physicians: a survey of primary care practitioners. Preventive medicine. 24, 6 (1995), 546--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Lister, C. et al. 2014. Just a Fad? Gamification in Health and Fitness Apps. JMIR Serious Games. 2, 2 (2014), e9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Mateo, G.F. et al. 2015. Mobile phone apps to promote weight loss and increase physical activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Mcarthur, V. 2017. The UX of Avatar Customization. ACM Proceedings (Denver, CO, USA, 2017). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. McLean, R.M. 2014. Measuring population sodium intake: A review of methods. Nutrients.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Miller, C.K. et al. 2016. Impact of a Worksite Diabetes Prevention Intervention on Diet Quality and Social Cognitive Influences of Health Behavior: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. 48, 3 (2016), 160--169.e1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Mummah, S.A. et al. 2016. Mobile Technology for Vegetable Consumption: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study in Overweight Adults. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 4, 2 (2016), e51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Murray, T. et al. 2013. A glanceable mobile avatar for behavior change. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Wireless Health - WH '13 (2013), 1--2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Myers, A. et al. 2016. Im2Calories: Towards an automated mobile vision food diary. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (2016), 1233--1241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. O'Flaherty, M. et al. 2016. Exploring potential mortality reductions in 9 European countries by improving diet and lifestyle: A modelling approach. International Journal of Cardiology. 207, (2016), 286--291.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Payaprom, Y. et al. 2011. Using the Health Action Process Approach and Implementation Intentions to Increase Flu Vaccine Uptake in High Risk Thai Individuals: A Controlled Before-After Trial. Health Psychology. 30, 4 (2011), 492--500.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Payne, H.E. et al. 2015. Behavioral functionality of mobile apps in health interventions: a systematic review of the literature. JMIR mHealth & uHealth. 3, 1 (2015), e20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Peffers, K. et al. 2008. A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems. 24, 3 (2008), 45--77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Peng, W. 2009. Design and evaluation of a computer game to promote a healthy diet for young adults. Health Communication. 24, 2 (2009), 115--127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Renner, B. and Schwarzer, R. 2005. The motivation to eat a healthy diet: How intenders and nonintenders differ in terms of risk perception, outcome expectancies, self-efficacy, and nutrition behavior. Polish Psychological Bulletin. 36, 1 (2005), 7--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. De Reuver, M. et al. 2015. Collective action for mobile payment platforms: A case study on collaboration issues between banks and telecom operators. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. 14, 5 (2015), 331--344. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Schwarzer, R. 2008. Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Applied Psychology. 57, 1 (2008), 1--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Song, H. et al. 2013. Anti-smoking educational game using avatars as visualized possible selves. Computers in Human Behavior. 29, 5 (2013), 2029--2036.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Strazzullo, P. et al. 2012. Population based strategy for dietary salt intake reduction: Italian initiatives in the European framework. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Strazzullo, P. et al. 2009. Salt intake, stroke, and cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 339, (2009), b4567.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Strom, B.L. 2013. Sodium Reduction in Populations. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 6055, Dr Ix (2013), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Tate, D.F. et al. 2001. Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program. JAMA, Journal of the American Medical Association. 285, (2001), 1172--1177.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Timon, C.M. et al. 2017. The development, validation, and user evaluation of foodbook24: A web-based dietary assessment tool developed for the irish adult population. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 19, 5 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Trinquart, L. et al. 2016. Why do we think we know what we know? A metaknowledge analysis of the salt controversy. International Journal of Epidemiology. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Turner-McGrievy, G. and Tate, D. 2011. Tweets, Apps, and Pods: Results of the 6-month Mobile Pounds Off Digitally (Mobile POD) randomized weight-loss intervention among adults. Journal of medical Internet research. 13, 4 (2011), e120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Wattanasoontorn, V. et al. 2014. Serious Games for e-Health Care. Simulations, Serious Games and Their Applications. 127--146.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. WHO 2014. Reducing salt intake in populations : report of a WHO forum and technical meeting, 5--7 October 2006, Paris, France. WHO Library. 1 (2014), 1--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. WHO 2012. WHO | Sodium intake for adults and children. WHO Library. ISBN 978 92 4 150483 6 (2012), 56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Williamson, D.A. et al. 2006. Two-year internet-based randomized controlled trial for weight loss in African-American girls. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.). 14, 7 (2006), 1231--1243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. World Salt Awareness Week: What Is a Safe Amount of Sodium? Why Are People Eating So Much Salt? 2015. https://www.cdc.gov/features/sodium/index.html. Accessed: 2017-09-17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Zhang, L. et al. 2015. A pilot study to validate a standardized one-week salt estimation method evaluating salt intake and its sources for family members in China. Nutrients. 7, 2 (2015), 751--763.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. NutritionAvatar: designing a future-self avatar for promotion of balanced, low-sodium diet intention: framework design and user study

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            CHItaly '19: Proceedings of the 13th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter: Designing the next interaction
            September 2019
            197 pages
            ISBN:9781450371902
            DOI:10.1145/3351995

            Copyright © 2019 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 23 September 2019

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            CHItaly '19 Paper Acceptance Rate23of47submissions,49%Overall Acceptance Rate109of242submissions,45%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader