skip to main content
10.1145/3352593.3352608acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesairConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A comparative study of robots in laparoscopic surgeries

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 January 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Robots have been used in industry for several decades. Their use in medicine is relatively more recent, starting from the late 1980s. Today, robotic surgical systems are used in urology, gynecology, cardiology, general surgery, and other medical specialties. Robot systems such as Da Vinci and ZEUS have helped accelerate and expand the boundaries of minimally invasive surgery. This has led to more complex yet safer procedures (compared to conventional laparoscopy) through better visualization, improved dexterity, and hand tremor filtering. These systems also provide improved hand-eye coordination and ergonomics resulting in reduced physical stress to the surgeons.

This paper is emphasized on providing a review of the different robotic surgical systems. A detailed comparison of the most commonly used systems, as well as their applications and cost implications, are discussed in the paper.

References

  1. "Surgeries and Lectures." [Online]. Available: https://www.lapguru.com/lapguru.php. [Accessed: 11-Oct-2018].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. R. Lanfranco, A. E. Castellanos, J. P. Desai, and W. C. Meyers, "Robotic Surgery: A Current Perspective," Ann. Surg., vol. 239, no. 1, pp. 14--21, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A. Cuschieri, "Laparoscopic surgery: Current status, issues and future developments," Surgeon, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 125--138, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. F. Graur, R. Harangus, and C. Ghenea, "Chapter 2 Robotic Surgery: Evolution, Current State and Future," 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. N. G. Hockstein, C. G. Gourin, R. A. Faust, and D. J. Terris, "A history of robots: From science fiction to surgical robotics," J. Robot. Surg., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 113--118, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. G. T. Sung and I. S. Gill, "Robotic laparoscopic surgery: A comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus systems," Urology, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 893--898, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. F. Pugin, P. Bucher, and P. Morel, "History of robotic surgery: From AESOP® and ZEUS® to da Vinci®," J. Visc. Surg., vol. 148, no. 5, pp. e3--e8, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. B. M. Kraft, C. Jäger, K. Kraft, B. J. Leibl, and R. Bittner, "The AESOP robot system in laparoscopic surgery: Increased risk or advantage for surgeon and patient?," Surg. Endosc. Other Interv. Tech., vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1216--1223, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. S. Deshpande, "Innovation in Robotic Surgery: The Indian Scenario," J. Minim. Access Surg., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 106, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. J. M. Gilbert, "The EndoAssistTM robotic camera holder as an aid to the introduction of laparoscopic colorectal surgery," Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl., vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 389--393, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. A. Bihlmaier, Learning Dynamic Spatial Relations. 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Mack, et al., "Use of the Voice-Controlled and Computer-Assisted Surgical System Zeus for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting.," pp. 11--16, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Eto and S. Naito, "Robotic Surgery Assisted by the ZEUS System," Recent Adv. Endourol., vol. 6, pp. 39--48, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. G. A. Fontanelli, F. Ficuciello, L. Villani, and B. Siciliano, "Modelling and identification of the da Vinci Research Kit robotic arms," IEEE Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst., vol. 2017--Septe, pp. 1464--1469, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. L. W. Sun, F. Van Meer, Y. Bailly, and C. K. Yeung, "Design and development of a da Vinci surgical system simulator," Proc. 2007 IEEE Int. Conf. Mechatronics Autom. ICMA 2007, pp. 1050--1055, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S. Winata, "Wireless Teleoperation Control Interface of Articulated Forceps for Minimally Wireless Teleoperation Control Interface of Articulated Forceps for Minimally Invasive Surgery," no. July, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. A. Brodie and S. T. Urology, "The future of robotic surgery."Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. "ROBOTICS, AUTOMATION & CONTROL." [Online]. Available: https://www.medicaldesignbriefs.com/component/content/article/mdb/stories/insider/33662?m=1575. [Accessed: 21-Jan-2019].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. B. S. Peters, P. R. Armijo, C. Krause, S. A. Choudhury, and D. Oleynikov, "Review of emerging surgical robotic technology," Surg. Endosc., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1636--1655, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. T. Overview, "Early Acute In-vivo Experience in Gynecology Oncology Applications with the SPORT Surgical System Technology," pp. 3--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    AIR '19: Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Advances in Robotics
    July 2019
    423 pages
    ISBN:9781450366502
    DOI:10.1145/3352593

    Copyright © 2019 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 January 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    AIR '19 Paper Acceptance Rate69of140submissions,49%Overall Acceptance Rate69of140submissions,49%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader