skip to main content
10.1145/3356250.3361964acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Vehicular mobility modeling based on heterogeneous sensor networks: poster abstract

Published:10 November 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Urban mobility especially vehicular mobility is important for many real-world applications. A lot of work has been done based on data from mobile sensor networks and stationary sensor networks, where each of them has its only weakness in spatiotemporal coverage and penetration rates. In this paper, we aim to coordinate the strength of heterogeneous sensor networks to achieve mobility modeling. Specifically, we design a mobility prediction system called Mohen to predict the destination of all the vehicles after they leave the coverage of stationary sensors with (i) only small portion vehicles with mobile sensors (i.e., GPS devices); (ii) historical data from stationary sensors (i.e., toll stations). The key novelty of Mohen is that we utilize the complementary features from heterogeneous sensor networks that mobile sensor networks provide better spatiotemporal coverage whereas stationary sensor networks capture vehicles with high penetration rates. We implement and evaluate Mohen in Guangdong Province, China by two real-world datasets, an electric toll collection (ETC) data set of 2 million vehicles, and an insurance-based vehicular tracking system of 114 thousand vehicles and show the accuracy of 75%.

References

  1. Raghu Ganti, Mudhakar Srivatsa, Anand Ranganathan, and Jiawei Han. 2013. Inferring Human Mobility Patterns from Taxicab Location Traces. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 459--468. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Marta C Gonzalez, Cesar A Hidalgo, and Albert-Laszlo Barabasi. 2008. Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature 453, 7196 (2008), 779--782.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ryo Imai, Kota Tsubouchi, Tatsuya Konishi, and Masamichi Shimosaka. 2018. Early Destination Prediction with Spatio-temporal User Behavior Patterns. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 4 (2018), 142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Anastasios Noulas, Salvatore Scellato, Renaud Lambiotte, Massimiliano Pontil, and Cecilia Mascolo. 2012. A tale of many cities: universal patterns in human urban mobility. PloS one 7, 5 (2012), e37027.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Yu Yang, Fan Zhang, and Desheng Zhang. 2018. SharedEdge: GPS-Free Fine-Grained Travel Time Estimation in State-Level Highway Systems. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 1 (2018), 48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Nicholas Jing Yuan, Yingzi Wang, Fuzheng Zhang, Xing Xie, and Guangzhong Sun. 2013. Reconstructing individual mobility from smart card transactions: A space alignment approach. In Data Mining (ICDM), 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on. IEEE, 877--886.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SenSys '19: Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
    November 2019
    472 pages
    ISBN:9781450369503
    DOI:10.1145/3356250

    Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 10 November 2019

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • poster

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate174of867submissions,20%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader