skip to main content
10.1145/3356422.3356430acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvinciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

VIStory: Interactive Storyboard for Exploring Visual Information in Scientific Publications

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 September 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many visual analytics have been developed for examining scientific publications comprising wealthy data such as authors and citations. The studies provide unprecedented insights on a variety of applications, e.g., literature review and collaboration analysis. However, visual information (i.e., figures) that are widely employed for storytelling and methods description are often neglected. We present VIStory, an interactive storyboard for exploring visual information in scientific publications. We harvest the data using an automatic figure extraction method, resulting in a large corpora of figures. Each figure contains various attributes such as dominant color and width/height ratio, together with faceted metadata of the publication including venues, authors, and keywords. To depict these information, we develop an intuitive interface consisting of three components: 1) Faceted View enables efficient query by publication metadata, benefiting from a nested table structure, 2) Storyboard View arranges paper rings -- a well-designed glyph for depicting figure attributes, in a themeriver layout to reveal temporal trends, and 3) Endgame View presents a highlighted figure together with the publication metadata. The system is especially useful for scientific publications containing substantial visual information, such as the visualization publications. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach using two case studies conducted on past ten-year IEEE VIS publications in 2009 - 2018.

References

  1. M. A. Borkin, Z. Bylinskii, N. W. Kim, C. M. Bainbridge, C. S. Yeh, D. Borkin, H. Pfister, and A. Oliva. 2016. Beyond Memorability: Visualization Recognition and Recall. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 1 (2016), 519--528. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467732Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. A. Borkin, A. A. Vo, Z. Bylinskii, P. Isola, S. Sunkavalli, A. Oliva, and H. Pfister. 2013. What Makes a Visualization Memorable? IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 12 (2013), 2306--2315. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG. 2013.234Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Chen, D. Ebert, H. Hagen, R. S. Laramee, R. van Liere, K. L. Ma, W. Ribarsky, G. Scheuermann, and D. Silver. 2009. Data, Information, and Knowledge in Visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 29, 1 (2009), 12--19. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2009.6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. J.K. Chou and C. K. Yang. 2011. PaperVis: Literature Review Made Easy. Computer Graphics Forum 30, 3 (2011), 721-730. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2011.01921.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. P. van der Corput and J. J. van Wijk. 2016. ICLIC: Interactive categorization of large image collections. In Proceedings of IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis). 152--159. https://doi.org/10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2016.7465263Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Danilo M. Eler, Marcel Y. Nakazaki, Fernando V. Paulovich, Davi P. Santos, Gabriel F. Andery, Maria Cristina F. Oliveira, João Batista Neto, and Rosane Minghim. 2009. Visual analysis of image collections. The Visual Computer 25, 10 (2009), 923-937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-009-0368-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Federico, F. Heimerl, S. Koch, and S. Miksch. 2017. A Survey on Visual Approaches for Analyzing Scientific Literature and Patents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 9 (2017), 2179--2198. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2610422Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Susan Havre, Beth Hetzler, and Lucy Nowell. 2000. ThemeRiver: Visualizing theme changes over time. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization. 115--123. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.2000.885098Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. I. T. Hawryszkiewycz. 1984. Database analysis and design. Science Research Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Paul Heckbert. 1982. Color Image Quantization for Frame Buffer Display. SIG GRAPH Comput. Graph. 16, 3 (1982), 297--307. https://doi.org/10.1145/965145.801294Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. F. Heimerl, Q. Han, S. Koch, and T. Ertl. 2016. CiteRivers: Visual Analytics of Citation Patterns. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 1 (2016), 190--199. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467621Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. P. Isenberg, F. Heimerl, S. Koch, T. Isenberg, P. Xu, C. D. Stolper, M. Sedlmair, J. Chen, T. Möller, and J. Stasko. 2017. Vispubdata.org: A Metadata Collection About IEEE Visualization (VIS) Publications. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 9 (2017), 2199--2206. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2615308Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. P. Isenberg, T. Isenberg, M. Sedlmair, J. Chen, and T. Möller. 2017. Visualization as Seen through its Research Paper Keywords. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1 (2017), 771--780. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598827Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. H. Jänicke and M. Chen. 2010. A Salience-based Quality Metric for Visualization. Computer Graphics Forum 29, 3 (2010), 1183-1192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2009.01667.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. P. Joia, D. Coimbra, J. A. Cuminato, F. V. Paulovich, and L. G. Nonato. 2011. Local Affine Multidimensional Projection. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 12 (2011), 2563--2571. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.220Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Daniel Keim, Gennady Andrienko, Jean-Daniel Fekete, Carsten Görg, Jörn Kohlhammer, and Guy Melançon. 2008. Visual Analytics: Definition, Process, and Challenges. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4950. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 154--175.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. K. Kucher and A. Kerren. 2015. Text visualization techniques: Taxonomy, visual survey, and community insights. In Proceedings of IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis). 117--121. https://doi.org/10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2015.7156366Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. S. Latif and F. Beck. 2018. VIS Author Profiles: Interactive Descriptions of Publication Records Combining Text and Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2018), 1--1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865022Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Y. Liang, X. Wang, S. Zhang, S. Hu, and S. Liu. 2018. PhotoRecomposer: Interactive Photo Recomposition by Cropping. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 24, 10 (2018), 2728--2742. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2764895Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J. Marino and A. Kaufman. 2016. Planar Visualization of Treelike Structures. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 1 (2016), 906--915. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467413Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. L. E. Matzen, M. J. Haass, K. M. Divis, Z. Wang, and A. T. Wilson. 2018. Data Visualization Saliency Model: A Tool for Evaluating Abstract Data Visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 24, 1 (2018), 563--573. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2743939Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. William Plant and Gerald Schaefer. 2011. Visualisation and Browsing of Image Databases. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 3-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19551-8_1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. J. F. Rodrigues, A. J. M. Traina, M. C. F. de Oliveira, and C. Traina. 2006. Reviewing Data Visualization: an Analytical Taxonomical Study. In Proceedings of Tenth International Conference on Information Visualisation. 713--720. https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2006.94Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. H.J. Schulz. 2011. Treevis.net: A Tree Visualization Reference. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 31, 6 (2011), 11--15. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2011.103Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Qiaomu Shen, Wei Zeng, Yu Ye, Stefan Mueller Arisona, Simon Schubiger, Remo Burkhard, and Huamin Qu. 2018. StreetVizor: Visual Exploration of Human-Scale Urban Forms Based on Street Views. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 24, 1 (2018), 1004 - 1013. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2744159Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. B Shneiderman. 1996. The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages. IEEE, 336 - 343. https://doi.org/10.1109/VL.1996.545307Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. H. Strobelt, D. Oelke, C. Rohrdantz, A. Stoffel, D. A. Keim, and O. Deussen. 2009. Document Cards: A Top Trumps Visualization for Documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 15, 6 (2009), 1145--1152. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2009.139Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. L. Tan, Y. Song, S. Liu, and L. Xie. 2012. ImageHive: Interactive Content-Aware Image Summarization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 32, 1 (2012), 46--55. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2011.89Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Paul van der Corput and Jarke J. van Wijk. 2017. Comparing Personal Image Collections with PICTuReVis. Computer Graphics Forum 36, 3 (2017), 295--304. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13188Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Yanhong Wu, Naveen Pitipornvivat, Jian Zhao, Sixiao Yang, Guowei Huang, and Huamin Qu. 2015. egoSlider: Visual Analysis of Egocentric Network Evolution. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 1 (2015), 260 - 269. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2468151Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. X. Xie, X. Cai, J. Zhou, N. Cao, and Y. Wu. 2018. A Semantic-based Method for Visualizing Large Image Collections. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2018), 1--1. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2835485Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. J. Yang, J. Fan, D. Hubball, Y. Gao, H. Luo, W. Ribarsky, and M. Ward. 2006. Semantic Image Browser: Bridging Information Visualization with Automated Intelligent Image Analysis. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium On Visual Analytics Science And Technology. 191--198. https://doi.org/10.1109/VAST.2006.261425Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Ka-Ping Yee, Kirsten Swearingen, Kevin Li, and Marti Hearst. 2003. Faceted metadata for image search and browsing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 642681, 401--408. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642681Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. VIStory: Interactive Storyboard for Exploring Visual Information in Scientific Publications

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      VINCI '19: Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Visual Information Communication and Interaction
      September 2019
      201 pages
      ISBN:9781450376266
      DOI:10.1145/3356422

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 September 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate71of193submissions,37%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader