Deogenes P. da Silva
Roberto Pereira
ABSTRACT
Inspired by the Open Software development model, Open Design is based on information and methodology applied to the design process, prioritizing free and open access and participation. In order to characterize Open Design in interactive computing systems and to identify the state of the art in this area, this paper presents a systematic mapping. Based on 12 selected papers, the main results indicate: (a) the absence of a general characterization encompassing the structure, process and tools; (b) a consensus on using Open Design because of its possible benefits; (c) lack of stakeholder involvement in research; and (d) lack of evaluation of research results. Data obtained from the mapping suggest Open Design is at a conceptual and exploratory stage where investigations are mostly conceptual and propositions of technical solutions are rare. Finally, the paper proposes a characterization for Open Design and suggests a research agenda for the area.
- Tanja Aitamurto, Dónal Holland, and Sofia Hussain. 2013. Three layers of openness in design: Examining the open paradigm in design research. In DS 75-1: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED13), Design for Harmonies, Vol. 1:Design Processes, Seoul, Korea, 19-22.08. 2013. 179--190.Google Scholar
- Paula M Bach, Robert DeLine, and John M Carroll. 2009. Designers wanted: participation and the user experience in open source software development. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 985--994.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Omar Badreddin, Wahab Hamou-Lhadj, Vahdat Abdelzad, Rahad Khandoker, and Maged Elassar. 2018. Collaborative Software Design and Modeling in Open Source Systems. In International Conference on System Analysis and Modeling. Springer, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 219--228.Google Scholar
- Yochai Benkler. 2002. Coase's Penguin, or, Linux and "The Nature of the Firm". The Yale Law Journal 112, 3 (2002), 369--446. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1562247Google ScholarCross Ref
- Étienne Boisseau, Jean-François Omhover, and Carole Bouchard. 2018. Open-design: A state of the art review. Design Science 4 (2018), e3.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jérémy Bonvoisin, Jean-François Boujut, et al. 2015. Open design platforms for open source product development: current state and requirements. In DS 80-8 Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15) Vol 8: Innovation and Creativity, Milan, Italy, 27-30.07. 15. 011--020.Google Scholar
- Colin Clark, Dana Ayotte, Antranig Basman, and Jutta Treviranus. 2016. About Us, with Us: The Fluid Project's Inclusive Design Tools. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Methods, Techniques, and Best Practices, Margherita Antona and Constantine Stephanidis (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 172--182.Google Scholar
- José Valderlei da Silva, Roberto Pereira, Elaine CS Hayashi, and M Cecília C Baranauskas. 2018. Design Practices and the SAwD Tool: Towards the Opendesign Concept. In International Conference on Informatics and Semiotics in Organisations. Springer, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 208--217.Google Scholar
- Natalie Ebenreuter. 2009. Working towards an open source design approach for the development of collaborative design projects. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/7. ACM, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 285--288.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nancy Hoffart. 2000. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Nephrology Nursing Journal 27, 2 (2000), 248--248.Google Scholar
- Barbara Kitchenham and Stuart Charters. 2007. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report.Google Scholar
- Michael D Koch, Irem Y Tumer, et al. 2009. Towards Open Design: The Emergent Face of Engineering---A Position Paper. In DS 58-3: Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 3, Design Organization and Management, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 24.-27.08. 2009. 97--108.Google Scholar
- Gerd Kortuem and Jacky Bourgeois. 2016. The internet of things for the open sharing economy. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct (UbiComp '16). ACM, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 666--669. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan Heidi Feng, and Harry Hochheiser. 2017. Research methods in human-computer interaction. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
- S.S. Levine and M.J. Prietula. 2012. Open source, open innovation, open communities: What drives the performance of "open"? Academy of Management 2012 Annual Meeting, AOM 2012 (2012), 515--520. cited By 0. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Roberto Pereira, M Cecília C Baranauskas, and Sergio Roberto P da Silva. 2013. Social software and educational technology: informal, formal and technical values. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 16, 1 (2013), 4--14.Google Scholar
- Gustavo Pinto, Igor Steinmacher, Luiz Felipe Dias, and Marco Gerosa. 2018. On the challenges of open-sourcing proprietary software projects. Empirical Software Engineering 23, 6 (2018), 3221--3247.Google ScholarDigital Library
- F Queiroz, R Spitz, G Allen, J Carver, SCT Choi, T Crick, MR Crusoe, and S Gesing. 2016. Collaborative gamification design for scientific software. In Workshop on Sustainable Software for Science: Practice and Experiences.Google Scholar
- Eric Raymond. 1999. The cathedral and the bazaar. Knowledge, Technology & Policy 12, 3 (1999), 23--49.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sonali K Shah. 2006. Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management science 52, 7 (2006), 1000--1014.Google Scholar
- Ronald K. Stamper. 2000. Information Systems as a Social Science. Springer US, Boston, MA, 1--51. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ryan Vallance, Sepehr Kiani, and Samir Nayfeh. 2001. Open design of manufacturing equipment. In Proceedings of the CHIRP 1st International Conference on Agile, Reconfigurable Manufacturing. CiteseerX, 33--43.Google Scholar
- Shuo Zhang and Yingzi Li. 2018. Modeling and Simulation Study of Two-Phase Collaborative Behaviors Oriented to Open Source Design Process. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2018 (2018), 15.Google Scholar
- Xiao-ye Zhou and M. M. Tseng. 2013. From Open Source Software and Open Innovation to Open Manufacturing. In International Asia Conference on Industrial Engineering and Management Innovation (IEMI2012) Proceedings. Springer, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 13--21.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Open design: a systematic mapping
Recommendations
The single-vendor commercial open course business model
Single-vendor commercial open source software projects are open source software projects that are owned by a single firm that derives a direct and significant revenue stream from the software. Single-vendor commercial open source at first glance ...
Open source software licenses: Strong-copyleft, non-copyleft, or somewhere in between?
Studies on open source software (OSS) have shown that the license under which an OSS is released has an impact on the success or failure of the software. In this paper, we model the relationship between an OSS developer's utility, the effort that goes ...
From proprietary to open source-Growing an open source ecosystem
In today's business and software arena, Free/Libre/Open Source Software has emerged as a promising platform for software ecosystems. Following this trend, more and more companies are releasing their proprietary software as open source, forming a ...
Comments