skip to main content
10.1145/3357155.3358471acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A systematic literature review on user centered design and participatory design with older people

Published:22 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

User-centered design (UCD) and participatory design (PD) are framework for developing applications suitable for the users' characteristics. However, UCD/PD provide little guidance on how to involve older people in the development process. We performed a Systematic Literature Review to know better how these processes are conducted with the participation of elderly people. We selected 51 papers published at ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore and Science Direct from 2013 to 2018, and extracted information about how and why UCD/PD has been used with the elderly, which were the used methods, what activities were performed with the elderly and also suggestions for future work. The main contributions of this work are to provide researchers with an understanding of the application of UCD and PD with older people and to show the need to improve traditional design methods in order to create suitable applications for them.

References

  1. Malek Alaoui, Karine Lan Hing Ting, and Myriam Lewkowicz. 2014. The Urge for Empirically-informed Design of Social-Oriented AAL Applications - The Example of 2 AAL Projects. Procedia Computer Science 27 (2014), 379 -- 388. 5th Int. Conf. on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion, DSAI 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. R. Baranyi, S. Rainer, S. Schlossarek, N. Lederer, and T. Grechenig. 2016. Visual Health Reminder: A Reminder for Medication Intake and Measuring Blood Pressure to Support Elderly People. In 2016 IEEE Int. Conf. on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI). 432--438.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Friederike Boll and Philipp Brune. 2015. User Interfaces with a Touch of Grey? - Towards a Specific UI Design for People in the Transition Age. Procedia Computer Science 63 (2015), 511 -- 516. The 6th Int. Conf. on Emerging Ubiquitous Systems and Pervasive Networks (EUSPN 2015)/ The 5th Int. Conf. on Current and Future Trends of Information and Communication Technologies in Healthcare (ICTH-2015)/ Affiliated Workshops.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Claus Bossen, Lars Rune Christensen, Erik Grönvall, and Lasse Steenbock Vestergaard. 2013. CareCoor: Augmenting the coordination of cooperative home care work. Int. Journal of Medical Informatics 82, 5 (2013), e189 -- e199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Federico Botella, Fernando Borras, and Jose Joaquin Mira. 2013. Safer Virtual Pillbox: Assuring Medication Adherence to Elderly Patients. In Proc. 3rd ACM MobiHoc Workshop on Pervasive Wireless Healthcare (MobileHealth '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 37 -- 42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Brasil. 2003. Lei No 10.741, de 1° de Outubro de 2003. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/2003/L10.741.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Marion Buchenau and Jane Fulton Suri. 2000. Experience Prototyping. In Proc. 3rd Conf. on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (DIS '00). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 424--433.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Derya Ozcelik Buskermolen and Jacques Terken. 2012. Co-constructing Stories: A Participatory Design Technique to Elicit In-depth User Feedback and Suggestions About Design Concepts. In Proc. 12th Participatory Design Conf.: Exploratory Papers, Workshop Descriptions, Industry Cases - Volume 2 (PDC '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 33--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Michela Cozza, Linda Tonolli, and Vincenzo D'Andrea. 2016. Subversive Participatory Design: Reflections on a Case Study. In Proc. 14th Participatory Design Conf.: Short Papers, Interactive Exhibitions, Workshops - Volume 2 (PDC '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 53--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. L. G. Dalgaard, E. Grönvall, and N. Verdezoto. 2013. MediFrame: A Tablet Application to Plan, Inform, Remind and Sustain Older Adults' Medication Intake. In 2013 IEEE Int. Conf. on Healthcare Informatics. 36--45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jennifer L. Davidson and Carlos Jensen. 2013. Participatory Design with Older Adults: An Analysis of Creativity in the Design of Mobile Healthcare Applications. In Proc. 9th ACM Conf. on Creativity & Cognition (C&C '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 114--123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jennifer L. Davidson and Carlos Jensen. 2013. What Health Topics Older Adults Want to Track: A Participatory Design Study. In Proc. 15th Int. ACM SIGACCESS Conf. on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 26, 8 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kadian Davis, Loe Feijs, Jun Hu, Lucio Marcenaro, and Carlo Regazzoni. 2016. Improving Awareness and Social Connectedness Through the Social Hue: Insights and Perspectives. In Proc. Int. Symposium on Interactive Technology and Ageing Populations (ITAP '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 12--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lucile Dupuy, Charles Consel, and Hélène Sauzéon. 2016. Self determination-based design to achieve acceptance of assisted living technologies for older adults. Computers in Human Behavior 65 (2016), 508 -- 521.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Mahzar Eisapour, Shi Cao, Laura Domenicucci, and Jennifer Boger. 2018. Participatory Design of a Virtual Reality Exercise for People with Mild Cognitive Impairment. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, CS15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Maria Angela Ferrario, Will Simm, Peter Newman, Stephen Forshaw, and Jon Whittle. 2014. Software Engineering for 'Social Good': Integrating Action Research, Participatory Design, and Agile Development. In Companion Proc. 36th Int. Conf. Software Engineering. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 520--523.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Flávio Ferreira, Nuno Almeida, Ana Filipa Rosa, André Oliveira, José Casimiro, Samuel Silva, and António Teixeira. 2014. Elderly Centered Design for Interaction - The Case of the S4S Medication Assistant. Procedia Computer Science 27 (2014), 398 -- 408. 5th Int. Conf. on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion, DSAI 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Asbjørn Følstad. 2008. Living labs for innovation and development of information and communication technology: a literature review. Electronic Journal of Organizational Virtualness 10 (2008), 100--131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Philip J. Guo. 2017. Older Adults Learning Computer Programming: Motivations, Frustrations, and Design Opportunities. In Proc. 2017 CHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7070--7083.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Mark Guzdial. 2015. Learner-centered design of computing education: Research on computing for everyone. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 8, 6 (2015), 1--165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Lilit Hakobyan, Jo Lumsden, Rachel Shaw, and Dympna O'Sullivan. 2016. A Longitudinal Evaluation of the Acceptability and Impact of a Diet Diary App for Older Adults with Age-related Macular Degeneration. In Proc. 18th Int. Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 124--134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Christina N Harrington, Lauren Wilcox, Kay Connelly, Wendy Rogers, and Jon Sanford. 2018. Designing Health and Fitness Apps with Older Adults: Examining the Value of Experience-Based Co-Design. In Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. ACM, 15--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Gillian R. Hayes. 2011. The Relationship of Action Research to Human-computer Interaction. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 18, 3, Article 15 (Aug. 2011), 20 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Dominik Hornung, Claudia Müller, Irina Shklovski, Timo Jakobi, and Volker Wulf. 2017. Navigating Relationships and Boundaries: Concerns Around ICT-uptake for Elderly People. In Proc. 2017 CHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7057--7069.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Iolanda Iacono and Patrizia Marti. 2014. Engaging Older People with Participatory Design. In Proc. 8th Nordic Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (NordiCHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 859--864.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. EN ISO. 2010. 9241--210: Human-centered design for interactive systems. Deutsches Institut für Normung (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. G. Jia, J. Zhou, P. Yang, C. Lin, X. Cao, H. Hu, and G. Ning. 2013. Integration of user centered design in the development of health monitoring system for elderly. In 2013 35th Annual Int. Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). 1748--1751.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Marije Kanis, Saskia Robben, Judith Hagen, Anne Bimmerman, Natasja Wagelaar, and Ben Krose. 2013. Sensor Monitoring in the Home: Giving Voice to Elderly People. Proc. ICTs for improving Patients Rehabilitation Research Techniques (2013), 2--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Anne Marie Kanstrup, Sergi Rotger-Griful, Ariane Laplante-Lévesque, and Annette Cleveland Nielsen. 2017. Designing Connections for Hearing Rehabilitation: Exploring Future Client Journeys with Elderly Hearing Aid Users, Relatives and Healthcare Providers. In Proc. 2017 Conf. on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1153--1163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Barbara Kitchenham, O Pearl Brereton, David Budgen, Mark Turner, John Bailey, and Stephen Linkman. 2009. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering-a systematic literature review. Information and software technology 51, 1 (2009), 7--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Tero Kivimäki, Petra Kölndorfer, Antti-Matti Vainio, Harri Pensas, Timo Vuorela, Markus Garschall, and Jukka Vanhala. 2013. User Interface for Social Networking Application for the Elderly. In Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 23, 8 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Wiesław Kopeć, Radosław Nielek, and Adam Wierzbicki. 2018. Guidelines Towards Better Participation of Older Adults in Software Development Processes using a new SPIRAL Method and Participatory Approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.10177 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Wieslaw Kopeć, Kinga Skorupska, Anna Jaskulska, Katarzyna Abramczuk, Radoslaw Nielek, and Adam Wierzbicki. 2017. LivingLab PJAIT: Towards Better Urban Participation of Seniors. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Web Intelligence (WI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1085--1092.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Hee Rin Lee, Selma Šabanović, Wan-Ling Chang, Shinichi Nagata, Jennifer Piatt, Casey Bennett, and David Hakken. 2017. Steps Toward Participatory Design of Social Robots: Mutual Learning with Older Adults with Depression. In Proc. 2017 ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 244--253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Cynthia LeRouge, Jiao Ma, Sweta Sneha, and Kristin Tolle. 2013. User profiles and personas in the design and development of consumer health technologies. Int. Journal of Medical Informatics 82, 11 (2013), e251 -- e268.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Gitte Lindgaard, Richard Dillon, Patricia Trbovich, Rachel White, Gary Fernandes, Sonny Lundahl, and Anu Pinnamaneni. 2006. User Needs Analysis and requirements engineering: Theory and practice. Interacting with Computers 18, 1 (2006), 47--70.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Aqueasha Martin-Hammond, Sravani Vemireddy, and Kartik Rao. 2018. Engaging Older Adults in the Participatory Design of Intelligent Health Search Tools. In Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. ACM, 280--284.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Aqueasha M. Martin-Hammond, Tamirat Abegaz, and Juan E. Gilbert. 2015. Designing an over-the-counter consumer decision-making tool for older adults. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 57 (2015), 113 -- 123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Siddharth Mehrotra, Vivian Genaro Motti, Helena Frijns, Tugce Akkoc, Sena Büşra Yengeç, Oguz Calik, Marieke M. M. Peeters, and Mark A. Neerincx. 2016. Embodied Conversational Interfaces for the Elderly User. In Proc. 8th Indian Conf. on Human Computer Interaction (IHCI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 90--95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Josias Melo, Sandra Souza Rodrigues, Guilherme A. Martins, Humberto Lidio Antonelli, Renata P. M. Fortes, and Paula Costa Castro. 2016. An Analysis of Application Usage for Notes and Reminders by Older persons-ElderNote Case Study. In Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion (DSAI 2016). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 339--345.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Claudia Müller, Dominik Hornung, Theodor Hamm, and Volker Wulf. 2015. Practice-based Design of a Neighborhood Portal: Focusing on Elderly Tenants in a City Quarter Living Lab. In Proc. 33rd Annual ACM Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2295--2304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Luã Marcelo Muriana and Heiko Hornung. 2016. Who Are You?: Getting to Know and Understanding Older Adults with Dementia in Participatory Design at a Nursing Home. In Proc. 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computer Systems (IHC '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 16, 10 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Luã Marcelo Muriana and Heiko Horst Hornung. 2017. Including Older Adults into the Design Process: Challenges and Lessons Learned. In Proceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Jakob Nielsen. 1994. Usability Inspection Methods. In Conf. Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '94). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 413--414.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Janni Nielsen and Mads Bødker. 2009. Collaborating with Users: Cultural and (I)Literacy Challenges. In Proc. 21st Annual Conf. of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/7 (OZCHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 325--328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Donald A Norman and Stephen W Draper. 1986. User centered system design; new perspectives on human-computer interaction. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Oscar Peña, Deysi Ortega, Edgar Barreras, Mara Balestrini, and Mónica Tentori. 2014. Integration of Physical and Digital Media to Allow Older Adults Collectively Share Narratives During Reading Groups. In Proc. 5th Mexican Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction (MexIHC '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 53, 4 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Natasha Randall, Selma Šabanović, and Wynnie Chang. 2018. Engaging Older Adults with Depression as Co-Designers of Assistive In-Home Robots. In Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. ACM, 304--309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Claudia B. Rebola and Brian Jones. 2013. Sympathetic Devices: Designing Technologies for Older Adults. In Proc. 31st ACM Int. Conf. on Design of Communication (SIGDOC '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 151--156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Valeria Righi, Sergio Sayago, and Josep Blat. 2017. When we talk about older people in HCI, who are we talking about? Towards a in the design of technologies for a growing ageing population. Int. Journal of Human-Computer Studies 108 (2017), 15 -- 31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Mariane M. T. Santos, Humberto Lidio Antonelli, Sandra Souza Rodrigues, Caroline L. de O. Silva, Renata P. M. Fortes, and Paula Costa Castro. 2016. Personalizing Health-related ICT Interface and Application: Older Adults and Elderly Caregivers Preferences. In Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion (DSAI 2016). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 331--338.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Alberto Signoretti, Ana I. Martins, Nuno Almeida, Diogo Vieira, Ana Filipa Rosa, Carlos M.M. Costa, and António Texeira. 2015. Trip 4 All: A Gamified App to Provide a New Way to Elderly People to Travel. Procedia Computer Science 67 (2015), 301 -- 311. Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Jonas Sorgalla, Peter Schabsky, Sabine Sachweh, Miriam Grates, and Elisabeth Heite. 2017. Improving Representativeness in Participatory Design Processes with Elderly. In Proc. 2017 CHI Conf. Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2107--2114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Martin Stein, Johanna Meurer, Alexander Boden, and Volker Wulf. 2017. Mobility in Later Life: Appropriation of an Integrated Transportation Platform. In Proc. 2017 CHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5716--5729.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Hanna Strömberg, Valtteri Pirttilä, and Veikko Ikonen. 2004. Interactive scenarios---building ubiquitous computing concepts in the spirit of participatory design. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 8 (2004), 200--207.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Özge Subasi. 2013. Designing a Travel Companion for Mature Age. In Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 63, 4 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Karine Lan Hing Ting and Myriam Lewkowicz. 2015. From Prototype Testing to Field Trials: The Implication of Senior Users in the Evaluation of a Social Application. Procedia Computer Science 67 (2015), 273 -- 282. Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Tiffany Tong and Mark Chignell. 2013. Designing Game-based Cognitive Assessments for Elderly Adults. In Proc. First Int. Conf. on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications (Gamification '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 127--130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Tiffany Tong and Mark Chignell. 2014. Developing a Serious Game for Cognitive Assessment: Choosing Settings and Measuring Performance. In Proc. Second Int. Symposium of Chinese CHI (Chinese CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 70--79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Stephen Uzor and Lynne Baillie. 2018. Exploring the Communication of Progress in Home-based Falls Rehabilitation using Exergame Technologies. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 4 (2018), 167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. A. Veloso and L. Costa. 2015. Social network games in an ageing society: Co-designing online games with adults aged 50 and over. In 2015 10th Iberian Conf. on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Joël Vogt and Andreas Meier. 2010. An Adaptive User Interface Framework for eHealth Services based on UIML. In Proc. 23th BLED Conf. 20--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Torben Volkmann, Michael Sengpiel, and Nicole Jochems. 2016. Historytelling: A Website for the Elderly A Human-Centered Design Approach. In Proc. 9th Nordic Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 100, 6 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. P. Wargnier, E. Phuong, K. Marivan, S. Benveniste, F. Bloch, S. Reingewirtz, G. Kemoun, and A. S. Rigaud. 2016. Virtual Promenade: A new serious game for the rehabilitation of older adults with Post-fall Syndrome. In 2016 IEEE Int. Conf. on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH). 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Christopher R. Wilkinson and Antonella De Angeli. 2014. Applying user centred and participatory design approaches to commercial product development. Design Studies 35, 6 (2014), 614 -- 631.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Richard J. Wirth, Chien Wen Yuan, Benjamin V. Hanrahan, John M. Carroll, Mary Beth Rosson, and Jomara Bindá. 2016. Exploring Interactive Surface Designs for Eliciting Social Activity from Elderly Adults. In Proc. 2016 ACM Int. Conf. on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (ISS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 403--408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Jiajie Zhang. 2005. Human-centered computing in health information systems Part 1: Analysis and design.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A systematic literature review on user centered design and participatory design with older people

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IHC '19: Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      October 2019
      679 pages
      ISBN:9781450369718
      DOI:10.1145/3357155

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 October 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      IHC '19 Paper Acceptance Rate56of165submissions,34%Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader