skip to main content
10.1145/3357155.3360474acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

AccessibiLint: a tool for early accessibility verification for android native applications

Published:22 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Smartphones are a powerful tool to help visually impaired people in accessing relevant services such as education, transportation and leisure through applications. Yet, despite the growing number of mobile accessibility studies, compared to website-related studies, there are still few established and well-established techniques and guidelines. As a result, development tools for building accessibility in mobile applications are scarce. They are based primarily on operating systems recommendations and guidelines, such as those provided by Google and Apple and many are useful only after the development effort has been spent. This paper presents AccessibiLint, a tool for static code verification of accessibility rules for Android native applications. AccessibiLint was developed as an extension of Android Lint tool base on a set of guidelines for visually impairment accessibility for native Android applications.

References

  1. Android developer. Test your app's accessibility. Retrieved May 29, 2019 from https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/ui/accessibility/testingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Android developer: Improve your code with Lint. Retrieved May 29, 2019 from https://developer.android.com/studio/write/lint?hl=pt-brGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. V. Balaji and K. S. Kuppusamy. 2017. Accessibility analysis of e-governance oriented mobile applications. 2016 International Conference on Accessibility to Digital World, ICADW 2016 - Proceedings, IEEE, 141--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Ana Baptista, José Martins, Ramiro Goncalves, Frederico Branco, and Tania Rocha. 2016. Web accessibility challenges and perspectives: A systematic literature review. 2016 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), IEEE, 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. BBC. 2017. British Broadcasting Corporation: Mobile Accessibility Guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.co.uk/guidelines/futuremedia/accessibility/mobileGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Marcelo M. Eler. 2018. Automated Accessibility Testing of Mobile Apps. IEEE 11th International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST). IEEE, 2018. p. 116--126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Felipe T. Gomes. 2018. SRS - um simulador visual de leitor de tela para desenvolvedores web. Master's thesis. University of São Paulo (USP), São Carlos, Brazil.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Mihály Héder. 2017. From NASA to EU: The evolution of the TRL scale in Public Sector Innovation. Innovation Journal 22, 2: 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Venkata N. Inukollu, Divya D. Keshamoni, Taeghyun Kang, and Manikanta Inukollu. 2014. Factors Influncing Quality of Mobile Apps: Role of Mobile App Development Life Cycle. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications (IJSEA) 5, 5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. J. Bern Jordan and Gregg C. Vanderheiden. 2013. Modality-independent interaction framework for cross-disability accessibility. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8023, PART 1: 218--227. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Guilherme A. de A. Martins. 2016. Usabilidade das interações táteis em dispositivos móveis por pessoas idosas. Master's thesis. University of São Paulo (USP), São Carlos, Brazil.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Arthur F. B. A. de Oliveira and Lucia V. L. Filgueiras. 2018. Developer assistance tools for creating native mobile applications accessible to visually impaired people: a systematic review. In Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2018. p. 16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Neha Patil, Dhananjay Bhole, and Prasanna Shete. 2017. Enhanced UI Automator Viewer with improved Android accessibility evaluation features. International Conference on Automatic Control and Dynamic Optimization Techniques, ICACDOT 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Leandro C. Serra, Lucas P. Carvalho, Lucas P. Ferreira, Jorge B. S. Vaz, and André P. Freire. 2015. Accessibility Evaluation of E-Government Mobile Applications in Brazil. Procedia Computer Science, Elsevier, 348--357. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Clauirton Siebra, Tatiana B. Gouveia, Jefte Macedo, et al. 2017. Toward accessibility with usability. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication - IMCOM '17, ACM Press, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. World Wide Web Consortium. 2018. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) (June 2018). Retrieved May 29, 2019 from https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. AccessibiLint: a tool for early accessibility verification for android native applications

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        IHC '19: Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        October 2019
        679 pages
        ISBN:9781450369718
        DOI:10.1145/3357155

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 October 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        IHC '19 Paper Acceptance Rate56of165submissions,34%Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader