skip to main content
10.1145/3357236.3395434acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Honorable Mention

Exploring Potential Scenarios and Design Implications Through a Camera-like Physical Odor Capture Prototype

Published:03 July 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recently, researchers have become increasingly interested in finding new input methods for olfactory interfaces. Physical odor capture is a potential solution to this issue and, in order to make it more accessible for users, we designed a portable and fast smell capture prototype based on headspace technology and inspired by point-and-shoot cameras. We conducted a two-week diary study with 13 participants, in which they were allowed to freely use the prototype for odor capture activities. Through diary and interview feedback, we summarized factors such as the motivations of capturing, the collected odor types, and perceptual effects of odor replay. We found that the capture activities can positively affect user emotions, memory, or perception. User preferences on device parameters were also gathered to guide further design iterations. Physical odor capture has many potential applications in daily-life and other implications resulting from the study have been proposed for further research.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

disfp2227.mp4

mp4

18.2 MB

References

  1. Judith Amores and Pattie Maes. 2017. Essence: Olfactory Interfaces for Unconscious Influence of Moodand Cognitive Performance. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 28--34. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Judith Amores, Pattie Maes, and Joe Paradiso. 2015. Binary: detecting the state of organic trash to prevent insalubrity. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive andUbiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, 313--316.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Yossiri Ariyakul and Takamichi Nakamoto. 2013. Improvement of odor blender using electroosmotic pumps and SAW atomizer for low-volatile scents. IEEE Sensors Journal 13, 12 (2013), 4918--4923.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. K. Hüsnü Can Başer and Temel Özek. 2012. Chapter 22- Analysis of Essential Oils and Fragrances by Gas Chromatography. In Gas Chromatography, Colin F.Poole (Ed.). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 519--527 .DOI: http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385540-4.00022-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Cecilia Bembibre and Matija Strli?c. 2017. Smell of heritage: a framework for the identification, analysis andarchival of historic odours. Heritage Science 5, 1 (2017), 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Joel Brandt, Noah Weiss, and Scott R Klemmer. 2007. txt 4 l8r: lowering the burden for diary studies under mobile conditions. In CHI'07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 2303--2308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Stephen Brewster, David McGookin, and Christopher Miller. 2006. Olfoto: designing a smell-basedinteraction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems. ACM, 653--662.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Arnie Cann and Debra A Ross. 1989. Olfactory stimulias context cues in human memory. American Journal of Psychology 102, 1 (1989), 91--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Liran Carmel and David Harel. 2007. Mix-to-mimicodor synthesis for electronic noses. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 125, 2 (2007), 635--643.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Yongsoon Choi, Adrian David Cheok, Xavier Roman,The Anh Nguyen, Kenichi Sugimoto, and Veronica Halupka. 2011a. Sound Perfume: Designing a Wearable Sound and Fragrance Media for Face-to-Face Interpersonal Interaction. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article Article 4, 8 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2071423.2071428Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Yongsoon Choi, Adrian David Cheok, Xavier Roman, Kenichi Sugimoto, Veronica Halupka, and others. 2011b.Sound perfume: designing a wearable sound and fragrance media for face-to-face interpersonal interaction. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology. ACM, 4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Chi Tai Dang, Andreas Seiderer, and Elisabeth André.2018. Theodor: A Step Towards Smart Home Applications with Electronic Noses. In Proceedings of the 5th international Workshop on Sensor-based Activity Recognition and Interaction. ACM, 11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Fabrizio Davide, Martin Holmberg, and Ingemar Lundström. 2001. 12 Virtual olfactory interfaces: electronic noses and olfactory displays. Communications Through Virtual Technology: Idnetity Community and Technology in the Internet Age, edited by G. Riva and F. Davide, IOS Press, Amsterdam(2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Digi International Inc. 2019. XBee Zigbee Through-Hole (PCB Antenna). (2019).https://www.digi.com/products/models/xb24cz7pit-004 [Online; accessed 21-August-2019].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Huong Q Dinh, Neff Walker, Larry F Hodges, Chang Song, and Akira Kobayashi. 1999. Evaluating the importance of multi-sensory input on memory and the sense of presence in virtual environments. In Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (Cat. No.99CB36316). IEEE, 222--228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. David Dobbelstein, Steffen Herrdum, and Enrico Rukzio. 2017. in Scent: A wearable olfactory display asan amplification for mobile notifications. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, 130--137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Bernadette Emsenhuber. 2011. Scent marketing:Making olfactory advertising pervasive. In Pervasiveadvertising. Springer, 343--360.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Karl-Georg Fahlbusch, Franz-Josef Hammerschmidt,Johannes Panten, Wilhelm Pickenhagen, Dietmar Schatkowski, Kurt Bauer, Dorothea Garbe, and Horst Surburg. 2003. Flavors and fragrances. Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry(2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Biyi Fang, Qiumin Xu, Taiwoo Park, and Mi Zhang.2016. Air Sense: an intelligent home-based sensing system for indoor air quality analytics. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International joint conference onpervasive and ubiquitous computing. ACM, 109--119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Gheorghita Ghinea and Oluwakemi Ademoye. 2012.The sweet smell of success: Enhancing multimediaapplications with olfaction. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM)8, 1 (2012), 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Andres Gongora, David Chaves, Alberto Jaenal, Javier Gonzalez Monroy, and Javier González Jiménez. 2018. Toward the Generation of Smell Maps: Matching Electro-Chemical Sensor Information with Human Odor Perception.. In APPIS. 134--145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Daniel Harley, Alexander Verni, Mackenzie Willis,Ashley Ng, Lucas Bozzo, and Ali Mazalek. 2018. Sensory vr: Smelling, touching, and eating virtualreality. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM, 386--397.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Keisuke Hasegawa, Liwei Qiu, and Hiroyuki Shinoda.2017. Interactive midair odor control viaultra sound-driven air flow. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2017Emerging Technologies. ACM, 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Hede Tech Co.,Ltd. 2019. Aluminium-foil (Multi-Layer)Gas Sampling Bags. (2019). http://www.hedetech.net/supplier-117199-aluminium-foil-multi-layer-/gas-sampling-bags[Online; accessed 21-August-2019].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Rachel S Herz and Trygg Engen. 1996. Odor memory: Review and analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 3,3 (1996), 300--313.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Thomas P. Hettinger. 2011. Olfaction is a chemical sense, not a spectral sense. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 31 (2011), E349--E349. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103992108Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Sen H Hirano, Jed R Brubaker, Donald J Patterson, and Gillian R Hayes. 2013. Detecting cooking state with gas sensors during dry cooking. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing. ACM, 411--414.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sen H Hirano, Gillian R Hayes, and Khai N Truong.2015. uSmell: exploring the potential for gas sensors to classify odors in ubicomp applications relative to air flowand distance. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 19, 1(2015), 189--202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Carmen W Huie. 2002. A review of modern sample-preparation techniques for the extraction and analysis of medicinal plants. Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry 373, 1--2 (2002), 23--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Joseph Jofish Kaye. 2004. Making Scents: aromatic output for HCI. interactions 11, 1 (2004), 48--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Paul E Keller, Richard T Kouzes, Lars J Kangas, and Sherif Hashem. 1995. Transmission of Olfactory Information. Interactive technology and the new paradigm for healthcare 18 (1995), 168.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Pooya Khaloo, Brandon Oubre, Jeremy Yang, Tauhidur Rahman, and Sunghoon Ivan Lee. 2019. NOSE: ANovel Odor Sensing Engine for Ambient Monitoring of the Frying Cooking Method in Kitchen Environments. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 3, 2 (2019), 49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Sunyoung Kim and Eric Paulos. 2010. In Air: sharing indoor air quality measurements and visualizations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1861--1870.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Mei-Kei Lai. 2018. The Art of Digital Scent-People, Space and Time. Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts 10, 1 (2018), 2--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Anne Liu. Smells for Space: Olfactory Time capsule for Earthly Memories.https://www.media.mit.edu/projects/memories-of-earth/overview/. (????). Accessed April 22,2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Elle Luo and Katia Vega. 2018. Scentery: a calming multisensory environment by mixing virtual reality,sound, and scent. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct. 158--165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Emanuela Maggioni, Robert Cobden, Dmitrijs Dmitrenko, and Marianna Obrist. 2018. Smell-O-Message: integration of olfactory notifications into a messaging application to improve users' performance. In Proceedings of the 2018 on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction.ACM, 45--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Manisha Mohan. 2017. Technological interventions to detect, communicate and prevent sexual assault. Ph. D. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Niall Murray, Brian Lee, Yuansong Qiao, and Gabriel-Miro Muntean. 2016. Olfaction-enhanced multimedia: A survey of application domains, displays, and research challenges. ACM Computing Surveys(CSUR)48, 4 (2016), 56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Takamichi Nakamoto. 2016. Olfactory Display and Odor Recorder. John Wiley Sons, Ltd, Chapter 7, 247--314.DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118768495.ch7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Takamichi Nakamoto, Shigeki Otaguro, Masashi Kinoshita, Masahiko Nagahama, Keita Ohinishi, and Taro Ishida. 2008. Cooking up an interactive olfactory game display. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 28, 1 (2008), 75--78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Takuji Narumi, Shinya Nishizaka, Takashi Kajinami, Tomohiro Tanikawa, and Michitaka Hirose. 2011. Augmented reality flavors: gustatory display based onedible marker and cross-modal interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 93--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Marianna Obrist, Alexandre N Tuch, and Kasper Hornbaek. 2014a. Opportunities for odor: experiences with smell and implications for technology. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2843--2852.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Marianna Obrist, Alexandre N. Tuch, and Kasper Hornbaek. 2014b. Opportunities for Odor: Experiences with Smell and Implications for Technology. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2843--2852. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Nimesha Ranasinghe, Pravar Jain, Nguyen Thi Ngoc Tram, Koon Chuan Raymond Koh, David Tolley, Shienny Karwita, Lin Lien-Ya, Yan Liangkun, Kala Shamaiah, Chow Eason Wai Tung, and others. 2018.Season traveller: Multisensory narration for enhancing the virtual reality experience. In Proceedings of the 2018CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 577.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Hesham HA Rassem, Abdurahman H Nour, and Rosli MYunus. 2016. Techniques for extraction of essential oils from plants: a review. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 10, 16 (2016), 117--127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Sparkfun. 2019. Pro Micro - 3.3V/8MHz. (2019).https://www.sparkfun.com/products/12587[Online; accessed 21-August-2019].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Agata Spietelun, Michaŀ Pilarczyk, Adam Kloskowski,and Jacek Namieśnik. 2010. Current trends in solid-phase micro extraction (SPME) fibre coatings. Chemical Society Reviews 39, 11 (2010), 4524--4537.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Sayumi Sugimoto, Daisuke Noguchi, Yuichi Bannnai,and Kenichi Okada. 2010. Ink jet olfactory display enabling instantaneous switches of scents. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM international conference on Multimedia. ACM, 301--310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Doménique Van Gennip, Elise Van Den Hoven, and Panos Markopoulos. 2015. Things that make us reminisce: Everyday memory cues as opportunities for interaction design. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3443--3452.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. O Wainwright. 2013. Scentography: the camera that records your favourite smells. The Guardian 28 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Lian Wang, Hong He, Changbin Zhang, Li Sun, Sijin Liu, and Shaoxin Wang. 2016. Antimicrobial activity of silver loaded MnO2 nano materials with different crystal phases against Escherichia coli. Journal of Environmental Sciences 41 (2016), 112--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Johan Willander and Maria Larsson. 2006. Smell your way back to childhood: Autobiographical odor memory. Psychonomic bulletin & review13, 2 (2006), 240--244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Donald A Wilson, Richard J Stevenson, and Richard J Stevenson. 2006. Learning to smell: olfactory perception from neurobiology to behavior. JHU Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Yasuyuki Yanagida. 2012. A survey of olfactory displays: Making and delivering scents. In SENSORS, 2012 IEEE. IEEE, 1--4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Exploring Potential Scenarios and Design Implications Through a Camera-like Physical Odor Capture Prototype

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          DIS '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference
          July 2020
          2264 pages
          ISBN:9781450369749
          DOI:10.1145/3357236

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 3 July 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

          Upcoming Conference

          DIS '24
          Designing Interactive Systems Conference
          July 1 - 5, 2024
          IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader