skip to main content
10.1145/3357236.3395470acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Design for Change With and for Children: How to Design Digital StoryTelling Tool to Raise Stereotypes Awareness

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 July 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Gender stereotyping in child development and education is a known issue but as yet little attention has been given to the design for change, or at least attenuate, stereotypical thinking. In our research we explored how Digital StoryTelling (DST) could support children in their awareness of negative gender stereotypes. Following a participatory design-inspired approach we involved 43 participants; children and adults (teachers and experts in the domain), in three workshops with the purpose of exploring this design space. Here, we describe this full process and its outcomes: nine concepts to guide the design of a DST tool. The workflow and toolbox used during the process are instances of an approach that could be replicated in other contexts and/or to challenge other types of stereotypes. The main contribution of our research is towards the design for change with and for children. We hope that our work will inspire members of our community to address these issues.

References

  1. M. S. Turner J. C. Hogg M. A. Oakes P. J. Reicher S. D. & Wetherell. 1987. Rediscovering the social group: Basil Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.20448309.1987.tb00799.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Olaiya E Aina and Petronella A Cameron. 2011. Why does gender matter? Counteracting stereotypes with young children. Dimensions of Early Childhood 39, 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Cooper Alan. 1999. The inmates are running the asylum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Houman Alborzi, Allison Druin, Jaime Montemayor, Lisa Sherman, Gustav Taxn, Jack Best, Joe Hammer, Alex Kruskal, Abby Lal, and Thomas Plaisant Schwenn. 2000. Designing Story Rooms: interactive storytelling spaces for children.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A Angeli and Sheryl Brahnam. 2006. Sex Stereotypes and Conversational Agents. In AVI 2006 Gender and Interaction: Real and Virtual Women in a Male World Workshop paper, 1--4. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a300/47f9bf4b858e51 62dbba82d0c9d76740766e.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Alissa Nicole Antle. 2006. Child-Personas: Fact or Fiction? In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '06), 22--30. https://doi.org/10.1145/1142405.1142411Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Michal Armoni and Judith Gal-Ezer. 2014. Early computing education: why? what? when? who? ACM Inroads 5, 4: 54--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Khaled Bachour, Frédéric Kaplan, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2008. Reflect: An interactive table for regulating face-to-face collaborative learning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 5192 LNCS: 39--48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87605-2_5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lori Baker-Sperry and Liz Grauerholz. 2003. The pervasiveness and persistence of the feminine beauty ideal in children's fairy tales. Gender and Society 17, 5: 711--726. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243203255605Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI?: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 1301--1310. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A R Barrett and J S Edwards. 1995. Knowledge elicitation and knowledge representation in a large domain with multiple experts. Expert Systems with Applications 8, 1: 169--176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. David N. Beede, Tiffany A. Julian, David Langdon, George McKittrick, Beethika Khan, and Mark E. Doms. 2011. Women in STEM: A Gender Gap to Innovation. Ssrn. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1964782Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Tessa Berg, Alexander Sharpe, and Emma Aitkin. 2018. Females in computing: Understanding stereotypes through collaborative picturing.computers and Education 126: 105--114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Marina Umaschi Bers and Justine Cassell. 1998. Interactive storytelling systems for children: using technology to explore language and identity. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 9: 183--215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Susan Birrell and Mary G. McDonald. 2012. Break Points: Narrative Interruption in the Life of Billie Jean King. Journal of Sport and Social Issues 36, 4: 343-- 360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723512442203Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Elizabeth Bonsignore. 2011. Sharing stories ?in the wild": a mobile storytelling case study. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, 917--922. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979516Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Philipp Brauner, Martina Ziefle, Ulrik Schroeder, Thiemo Leonhardt, Nadine Bergner, and Birgit Ziegler. 2018. Gender influences on school students' mental models of computer science: a quantitative rich picture analysis with sixth graders. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender & IT, 113--122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Jerome Bruner. 1991. The Narrative Construction of Reality. https://doi.org/10.1086/448619Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Diana Burgess and Eugene Borgida. 1999. Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and Prescriptive Gender Stereotyping in Sex Discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 5, 3: 665--692. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.5.3.665Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Margaret Burnett, Simone Stumpf, Jamie Macbeth, Stephann Makri, Laura Beckwith, Irwin Kwan, Anicia Peters, and William Jernigan. 2016. GenderMag: A method for evaluating software's gender inclusiveness. Interacting with Computers 28, 6: 760--787.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Kay Bussey and Albert Bandura. 2004. Social cognitive theory of gender development and functioning. The psychology of gender: 92--119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Justine Cassell. 1998. Storytelling as a nexus of change in the relationship between gender and technology: A feminist approach to software design. From Barbie to mortal kombat: Gender and computer games: 298--326.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Justine Cassell and Henry Jenkins. 2000. From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: gender and computer games. MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Madoda Cekico. 2013. Gender Stereotypes in selected fairytales: Implications for teaching reading in the foundation phase in south africa. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology 4, 3: 201--206. https://doi.org/10.1080/09766634.2013.11885597Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Andrei Cimpian, Yan Mu, and Lucy C. Erickson. 2012. Who Is Good at This Game? Linking an Activity to a Social Category Undermines Children's Achievement. Psychological Science 23, 5: 533--541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611429803Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. D. J Cuff, B. M., Brown, S. J., Taylor, L., & Howat. 2016. Empathy: a review of the concept. Emotion Review 8, 2: 144--153.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Daniel Christian Wahl. 2017. Meta-Design for whole systems health. Retrieved April 16, 2020 from https://medium.com/age-of-awareness/design-forwhole-systems-health-e700f1f030c6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Françoise Decortis and Antonio Rizzo. 2002. New active tools for supporting narrative structures. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 6, 5--6: 416--429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007790200046Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Allison Druin. 1999. Cooperative inquiry: developing new technologies for children with children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 592--599.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. A. Durndell and K. Thomson. 1997. Gender and computing: A decade of change? Computers and Education 28, 1: 1--9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S03601315(96)00034-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Susan K Egan and David G Perry. 2001. Gender identity: a multidimensional analysis with implications for psychosocial adjustment. Developmental psychology 37, 4: 451.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Ingbert R Floyd, M Cameron Jones, and Michael B Twidale. 2008. Resolving incommensurable debates: a preliminary identification of persona kinds, attributes, and characteristics. Artifact 2, 1: 12--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Willem Fontijn and Philip Mendels. 2005. StoryToy the interactive storytelling toy. In Second International Workshop on Gaming Applications in Pervasive Computing Environments at Pervasive.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Alexandra Funke and Katharina Geldreich. 2017. Gender differences in scratch programs of primary school children. In Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Primary and Secondary Computing Education, 57--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Nicole Gardner-Neblett and John Sideris. 2018. Different Tales: The Role of Gender in the Oral Narrative--Reading Link Among African American Children. Child development 89, 4: 1328--1342.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Angela M Gooden and Mark A Gooden. 2001. Gender Representation in Notable Children's Picture Books: 1995--1999. Sex Roles 45, 1: 89--101. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013064418674Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Jonathan Grudin and John Pruitt. 2002. Personas, participatory design and product development: An infrastructure for engagement. In Proc. PDC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Mona Leigh Guha, Allison Druin, and Jerry Alan Fails. 2013. Cooperative Inquiry revisited: Reflections of the past and guidelines for the future of intergenerational co-design. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 1, 1: 14--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Geert Hofstede. 2011. Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online readings in psychology and culture 2, 1: 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Dennis Hummel, Sinja Herbertz, and Alexander Mädche. 2018. Biological Sex vs. Psychological Gender-Roles in Online Channel Choices: Evidence from Two Studies in the Financial Services Industry. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender & IT (GenderIT '18), 199--208. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196839.3196870Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Scott G Isaksen. 1987. Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics. Bearly Limited.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Helvi Itenge-Wheeler, Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, Alessandro Soro, and Margot Brereton. 2018. Child designers creating personas to diversify design perspectives and concepts for their own technology enhanced library. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 381--388.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Ole Sejer Iversen, Rachel Charlotte Smith, and Christian Dindler. 2017. Child as protagonist: Expanding the role of children in participatory design. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 27--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Matthew L Jockers and Gabi Kirilloff. 2016. Understanding Gender and Character Agency in the 19th Century Novel. Journal of Cultural Analytics: 1--11. https://doi.org/10.22148/16.010Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Caitlin Kelleher, Randy Pausch, and Sara Kiesler. 2007. Storytelling alice motivates middle school girls to learn computer programming. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '07: 1455. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240844Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Monica Landoni, Elisa Rubegni, and Emma Nicol. 2018. A comparative study into how pupils can play different roles in co-design activities. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Lynn S Liben, Rebecca S Bigler, Diane N Ruble, Carol Lynn Martin, and Kimberly K Powlishta. 2002. The developmental course of gender differentiation: Conceptualizing, measuring, and evaluating constructs and pathways. Blackwell Boston.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Y-C Liu, Amaresh Chakrabarti, and T Bligh. 2003. Towards an "ideal'approach for concept generation. Design Studies 24, 4: 341--355.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Bonnie Thompson Long, Tony Hall, Michael Hogan, Owen Harney, Theodoros Doukoulos, and Chita Murray. 2017. Using a Collective Intelligence Scenario-Based Design approach to develop a collaboration ecosystem supporting the authorship of pedagogically valuable e-books for children. Journal of Literacy and Technology 18, 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Patricia Louie. 2012. Not so Happily Ever After? The Grimm Truth about Gender Representations in Fairytales. UBC Women's and Gender Studies Undergraduate Journal 4, 1: 74--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Diane M Mackie, David L Hamilton, Joshua Susskind, and Francine Rosselli. 1996. Social psychological foundations of stereotype formation. Stereotypes and stereotyping: 41--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Carol Lynn Martin, Richard A. Fabes, Laura Hanish, Stacie Leonard, and Lisa M. Dinella. 2011. Experienced and Expected Similarity to Same-Gender Peers: Moving Toward a Comprehensive Model of Gender Segregation. Sex Roles 65, 5: 421--434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0029-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Carol Lynn Martin and Diane Ruble. 2004. Children's search for gender cues: Cognitive perspectives on gender development. Current directions in psychological science 13, 2: 67--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. M. A. Messner. 2000. Barbie Girl versus Sea Monster: Children Constructing Gender. Gender & Society 14, 6: 765--784. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124300014006004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Jenna Lee Moore. 2008. The Impact Of Participation In School Choirs On The Construction Of Gender Identity?: An Autobiographical Narrative Jenna Lee Moore Westminster Choir College of Rider University. GEMS -- Gender, Education, Music & Society 4, 2008. Retrieved from www.queensu.ca/music/links/gems/moore5.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. May M Narahara. 1998. Gender Stereotypes in Children's Picture Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Ageliki Nicolopoulou. 2014. The elementary forms of narrative coherence in young children's storytelling. Narrative Inquiry 18, 2: 299--325. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.18.2.07nicGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Lene Nielsen. 2013. Personas-user focused design. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. A.S North and J.M Noyes. 2002. Gender influences on children's computer attitudes and cognitions.computers in Human Behavior 18, 2: 135--150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00043-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Johanna Okerlund, Madison Dunaway, Celine Latulipe, David Wilson, and Eric Paulos. 2018. Statement Making: A Maker Fashion Show Foregrounding Feminism, Gender, and Transdisciplinarity. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 187--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Alex F Osborn. 1957. Applied Imagination, revised edition. Scribner, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Louise G Phillips. 2010. Young Children's active citizenship: storytelling, stories and social actions.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Mark Rice, Yian Ling Cheong, Jamie Ng, Puay Hoe Chua, and Yin-Leng Theng. 2012. Co-creating games through intergenerational design workshops. In Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference, 368--377.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Bernard R. Robin. 2008. Digital storytelling: A powerful technology tool for the 21st century classroom. Theory into Practice 47, 3: 220--228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802153916Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Jennifer A Rode and E Shenan Poole. 2018. Putting the gender back in digital housekeeping.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Mary Beth Rosson and John M Carroll. 2009. Scenariobased design. In Human-computer interaction. CRC Press, 161--180.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Elisa Rubegni and Monica Landoni. 2014. Fiabot?! Design and Evaluation of a Mobile Storytelling Application for Schools. In Idc 2014, 165--174. https://doi.org/10.1145/2593968.2593979Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Elisa Rubegni and Monica Landoni. 2018. How to design a digital storytelling authoring tool for developing pre-reading and pre-writing skills. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 395.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Elisa Rubegni, Monica Landoni, Antonella De Angeli, and Letizia Jaccheri. 2019. Detecting Gender Stereotypes in Children Digital StoryTelling. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '19), 386--393. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311927.3323156Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Andy Russell. 2010. ToonTastic: a global storytelling network for kids, by kids. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction, 271--274. https://doi.org/10.1145/1709886.1709942Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Kimiko Ryokai and Justine Cassell. 1999. StoryMat: a play space for collaborative storytelling. In CHI'99 extended abstracts on Human factors in ?, 272--273. https://doi.org/10.1145/632716.632883Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Douglas Schuler and Aki Namioka. 1993. Participatory design: Principles and practices. CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Sindre B Skaraas, Javier Gomez, and Letizia Jaccheri. 2018. Tappetina's empathy game: a playground of storytelling and emotional understanding. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 509--512.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Cyd Skinner. 2013. Gender and language in best-selling children's picture books: Who gets to speak? Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&d b=psyh&AN=2013-99240-205&site=ehost-liveGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Rabea Sonnenschein, André Loske, and Peter Buxmann. 2016. Gender Differences in Mobile Users' IT Security Appraisals and Protective Actions: Findings from a Mixed-Method Study.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Katta Spiel, Os Keyes, and Pιnar Barlas. 2019. Patching gender: non-binary utopias in HCI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Bernadette Spieler. 2018. Reinforcing Gender Equality by Analysing Female Teenagers' Performances in Coding Activities: A Lesson Learned. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender & IT (GenderIT '18), 209--219. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196839.3196871Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Cristina Sylla, Vítor Martins, Gabriela Sá, Ana Paula Caruso, Bruno Amaro, Douglas Menegazzi, and Francisco Sylla. 2019. Mobeybou-A Digital Manipulative for Multicultural Narrative Creation. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, VS15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Jennifer Tsan, Kristy Elizabeth Boyer, and Collin F Lynch. 2016. How early does the CS gender gap emerge?: a study of collaborative problem solving in 5th grade computer science. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM technical symposium on computing science education, 388--393.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Marina Umaschi and Justine Cassell. 1997. Storytelling Systems: Constructing the Innerface of the Interface. Second International Conference on Cognitive Technology - Humanizing the Information Age: 98--108. https://doi.org/10.1109/CT.1997.617688Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Susan D. Witt. 1997. Parental influence on children's socialization to gender roles. Adolescence 32, 126: 253.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Korlan Zhumabekova, Altynay Ismailova, Daniyar Kushkinbayev, and Anara Sandygulova. 2018. Exploring the Effects of Robot Gender on Child-Robot Interaction. In Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 287--288.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Design for Change With and for Children: How to Design Digital StoryTelling Tool to Raise Stereotypes Awareness

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            DIS '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference
            July 2020
            2264 pages
            ISBN:9781450369749
            DOI:10.1145/3357236

            Copyright © 2020 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 3 July 2020

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

            Upcoming Conference

            DIS '24
            Designing Interactive Systems Conference
            July 1 - 5, 2024
            IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader