skip to main content
10.1145/3357384.3357857acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

LuPe: A System for Personalized and Transparent Data-driven Decisions

Published: 03 November 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Machine learning models are commonly used for decision support even though they are far from perfect, e.g., due to bias introduced by imperfect training data or wrong feature selection. While efforts are made and should continue to be put into developing better models, we will likely continue to rely on imperfect models in many applications. In these settings, how could we at least use the "best" model for an individual or a group of users and transparently communicate the risks and weaknesses that apply?
We demonstrate LuPe, a system that addresses these questions. LuPe allows to optimize the choice of the applied model for subgroups of the population or individuals, thereby personalizing the model choice to best fit users' profiles, which improves fairness. LuPe further captures data to explain the choices made and the results of the model. We showcase how such data enable users to understand the system performance they can expect. This transparency helps users in making informed decisions or providing informed consent when such systems are used. Our demonstration will focus on several real-world applications showcasing the behavior of LuPe, including credit scoring and income prediction.

References

[1]
Toon Calders and Sicco Verwer. 2010. Three naive Bayes approaches for discrimination-free classification. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, Vol. 21, 2 (2010), 277--292.
[2]
C. Dwork, N. Immorlica, A. T. Kalai, and M. Leiserson. 2018. Decoupled Classifiers for Group-Fair and Efficient Machine Learning. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, Vol. 81. 119--133.
[3]
T. Gebru, J. Morgenstern, B. Vecchione, J.W. Vaughan, H. Wallach, H. Daumeé III, and K. Crawford. 2018. Datasheets for Datasets. In Workshop on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency in Machine Learning.
[4]
M. Herschel, R. Diestelk"a mper, and H. Ben Lahmar. 2017. A survey on provenance: What for? What form? What from? The VLDB Journal, Vol. 26, 6 (2017), 881--906.
[5]
S. Lowry and G. Macpherson. 1988. A blot on the profession. British medical journal (Clinical research ed.), Vol. 296, 6623 (1988), 657--658.
[6]
M. Mitchell, S. Wu, A. Zaldivar, P. Barnes, L. Vasserman, B. Hutchinson, E. Spitzer, I.D. Raji, and T. Gebru. 2019. Model Cards for Model Reporting. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 220--229.
[7]
M. Tú lio Ribeiro, S. Singh, and C. Guestrin. 2016. "Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. In International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 1135--1144.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Applications of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Finance—a systematic review of Finance, Information Systems, and Computer Science literatureManagement Review Quarterly10.1007/s11301-023-00320-074:2(867-907)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2023
  • (2021)Subgroup Invariant Perturbation for Unbiased Pre-Trained Model PredictionFrontiers in Big Data10.3389/fdata.2020.5902963Online publication date: 18-Feb-2021
  • (2020)A System Framework for Personalized and Transparent Data-Driven DecisionsAdvanced Information Systems Engineering10.1007/978-3-030-49435-3_10(153-168)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2020

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CIKM '19: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
November 2019
3373 pages
ISBN:9781450369763
DOI:10.1145/3357384
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 November 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CIKM '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

CIKM '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 202 of 1,031 submissions, 20%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

Upcoming Conference

CIKM '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Applications of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Finance—a systematic review of Finance, Information Systems, and Computer Science literatureManagement Review Quarterly10.1007/s11301-023-00320-074:2(867-907)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2023
  • (2021)Subgroup Invariant Perturbation for Unbiased Pre-Trained Model PredictionFrontiers in Big Data10.3389/fdata.2020.5902963Online publication date: 18-Feb-2021
  • (2020)A System Framework for Personalized and Transparent Data-Driven DecisionsAdvanced Information Systems Engineering10.1007/978-3-030-49435-3_10(153-168)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media