skip to main content
10.1145/3357384.3358088acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Real-time Edge Repartitioning for Dynamic Graph

Published:03 November 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

To improve the performance of large graph computing, graph partitioning has become a mandatory step in distributed graph computing frameworks. Some existing frameworks partition edges of an input graph in a streaming way. As the scale of real-world graphs grows dynamically, they need to limit the increasing communication cost and time cost in graph computing by reducing vertex replicas(each vertex can be replicated to multiple partitions). In this paper, we propose a real-time edge repartitioning algorithm for dynamic graph, which reduces the vertex replicas by reassigning edges near the new edge. We find that some edges are migrated just after being assigned, which leads to unnecessary migrations. To reduce migration cost, according to the replicas distribution of neighbors of two vertices connected by the new edge, we assign the new edge to the partition where it is most likely to be located after repartitioning. Our evaluation shows that it improves the performance of graph computing by only a small amount of migration.

References

  1. Florian Bourse, Marc Lelarge, and Milan Vojnovic. 2014. Balanced graph edge partition. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 1456--1465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Joseph E Gonzalez, Yucheng Low, Haijie Gu, Danny Bickson, and Carlos Guestrin. 2012. Powergraph: Distributed graph-parallel computation on natural graphs. In Presented as part of the 10th $$USENIX$$ Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation ($$OSDI$$ 12). 17--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Dinesh Kumar, Arun Raj, and Janakiram Dharanipragada. 2017. GraphSteal: Dynamic Re-Partitioning for Efficient Graph Processing in Heterogeneous Clusters. In 2017 IEEE 10th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD). IEEE, 439--446.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jure Leskovec and Andrej Krevl. 2014. Stanford Large Network Dataset Collection. http://snap.stanford.edu/data .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Yucheng Low, Danny Bickson, Joseph Gonzalez, Carlos Guestrin, Aapo Kyrola, and Joseph M Hellerstein. 2012. Distributed GraphLab: a framework for machine learning and data mining in the cloud. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment , Vol. 5, 8 (2012), 716--727.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Grzegorz Malewicz, Matthew H Austern, Aart JC Bik, James C Dehnert, Ilan Horn, Naty Leiser, and Grzegorz Czajkowski. 2010. Pregel: a system for large-scale graph processing. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data. ACM, 135--146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Christian Mayer, Muhammad Adnan Tariq, Ruben Mayer, and Kurt Rothermel. 2018. Graph: Traffic-aware graph processing. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems , Vol. 29, 6 (2018), 1289--1302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Fabio Petroni, Leonardo Querzoni, Khuzaima Daudjee, Shahin Kamali, and Giorgio Iacoboni. 2015. Hdrf: Stream-based partitioning for power-law graphs. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 243--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Real-time Edge Repartitioning for Dynamic Graph

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '19: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
      November 2019
      3373 pages
      ISBN:9781450369763
      DOI:10.1145/3357384

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 November 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      CIKM '19 Paper Acceptance Rate202of1,031submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader