skip to main content
10.1145/3357384.3358152acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Geometric Estimation of Specificity within Embedding Spaces

Published:03 November 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Specificity is the level of detail at which a given term is represented. Existing approaches to estimating term specificity are primarily dependent on corpus-level frequency statistics. In this work, we explore how neural embeddings can be used to define corpus-independent specificity metrics. Particularly, we propose to measure term specificity based on the distribution of terms in the neighborhood of the given term in the embedding space. The intuition is that a term that is surrounded by other terms in the embedding space is more likely to be specific while a term surrounded by less closely related terms is more likely to be generic. On this basis, we leverage geometric properties between embedded terms to define three groups of metrics: (1) neighborhood-based, (2) graph-based and (3) cluster-based metrics. Moreover, we employ learning-to-rank techniques to estimate term specificity in a supervised approach by employing the three proposed groups of metrics. We curate and publicly share a test collection of term specificity measurements defined based on Wikipedia's category hierarchy. We report on our experiments through metric performance comparison, ablation study and comparison against the state-of-the-art baselines.

References

  1. Ben He and Iadh Ounis. 2004. Inferring Query Performance Using Pre-retrieval Predictors.. In String Processing and Information Retrieval, 11th International Conference, SPIRE 2004, Padova, Italy, October 5--8, 2004, Proceedings. 43--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Karen Spärck Jones. 2004. A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. Journal of Documentation 60, 5 (2004), 493--502.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. P. Kapanipathi, P. Jain, C. Venkatramani, and A. P. Sheth. 2014. User Interests Identification on Twitter Using a Hierarchical Knowledge Base. In ESWC. 99--113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Y. Li, R. Zheng, T. Tian, Z. Hu, R. Iyer, and K. P. Sycara. 2016. Joint Embedding of Hierarchical Categories and Entities for Concept Categorization and Dataless Classification. In COLING. 2678--2688.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhaskar Mitra and Nick Craswell. 2018. An Introduction to Neural Information Retrieval. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 13, 1 (2018), 1--126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. H. Zamani, W. B. Croft, and J. S. Culpepper. 2018. Neural Query Performance Prediction using Weak Supervision from Multiple Signals. In SIGIR. 105--114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Geometric Estimation of Specificity within Embedding Spaces

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CIKM '19: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
            November 2019
            3373 pages
            ISBN:9781450369763
            DOI:10.1145/3357384

            Copyright © 2019 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 3 November 2019

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • short-paper

            Acceptance Rates

            CIKM '19 Paper Acceptance Rate202of1,031submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

            Upcoming Conference

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader